Facebook Sued for $1.00 After Labeling David Fagin a Spammer

Facebook Suggests Friends, Penalizes for Sending Requests

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:

Facebook Sued for $1.00 After Labeling David Fagin a Spammer
[ Social Media]

After being blocked by Facebook from sending friend requests, David Fagin has decided to sue the company for…a dollar.

It sounds silly, but Fagin, actually brings up some fairly interesting points. He even went so far as to issue a press release. It begins:

There aren’t too many words that exist in Webster’s New Millennium Dictionary that conjure up more offensive and sleazy images than that of a “spammer.” It’s pretty much the equivalent of an online pickpocket or con artist.

Nonetheless, the first time David Fagin saw he was being blocked from sending friend requests on Facebook, as well as being labeled a spammer, he didn’t think much of it. Then, when it happened again, and he was informed that he was in danger of having his account deleted, he tried to resolve it by reaching out to Facebook’s support department – only to discover they don’t have one.

He also put out an opinion piece for AOL News, where he included the above screenshot of messages he received from the social network. “When Facebook labels you a spammer, the first thing you must do before you’re allowed to use the site again is go through a humiliating ‘checklist’ of boxes, in which you’re forced to admit you’ve been a bad boy and promise not to do it again,” he writes. “I, like many others, have no life, and sometimes spend hours a day on Facebook. So tell me, what is the point of a feature that hits you with dozens of friend suggestions every hour, then clamps down on you and treats you like a registered sex offender when you take them up on it? Isn’t what they’re doing, for all intents and purposes, entrapment?”

I’m no lawyer but getting rejected from the site and unjustly being labeled a spammer would almost seem a bit libelous. Nobody wants to do business with a spammer.

“Some might say ‘What’s the big deal? It’s just a stupid social networking site,” he says. But, when you’re talking about arguably the biggest online presence the world has ever seen, one that’s currently worth more than Microsoft, and there’s no way to reach a live human being, that might be something for the FTC and/or congress to at least think about.”

The worth more than Microsoft thing has been questioned, but that’s not to say he doesn’t have a valid point. Facebook is becoming more and more a directory of where to find a person or a business online. It’s huge and growing. “Half the world now uses Facebook as a primary means of communication,” Fagin writes. “With the other half surely to follow by next Tuesday. So, If you don’t think being threatened with banishment from Facebook is a big deal, try to imagine what it would be like to live in the ’70s and be accused of making phony phone calls and banned from using AT&T.”

He says (despite the link to let the company know in the message at the top) he was unable to reach a human about the issue. Some of these big Internet companies are notorious for the difficulty involved with getting them to hear complaints, even when said complaints are completely valid. Certainly plenty of people have had similar issues with Google, but Facebook’s whole existence is based on communication and friendships. It couldn’t hurt to be a little more open on the support side of things.

It’s not like they can’t afford a team to handle support in an adequate fashion. WebProNews and parent company iEntry aren’t anywhere near the size of a Facebook or a Google, but we do have millions of subscribers, and our modestly sized team (compared to these giants) is able to respond to any emails they get with support-related issues.

“It’s not just the support issue, either,” Fagin said. “Facebook is actively contradicting their own policies. On one hand, they tell you not to ‘friend’ anyone you don’t already know. On the other, the site constantly bombards you with names of people that Facebook themselves suggests you should ‘friend’, as you already have multiple friends in common. This also runs in direct contradiction with the spammer label. If everyone on the site is only supposed to be friends with people they know, then everyone is a spammer. As, no one knows two thousand six hundred and eighty-eight people, personally. Not even Donald Trump. Not to mention, Facebook wants you to connect with as many people as possible. That’s how they get their advertisers salivating; by everyone ‘sharing’ and ‘liking’ their favorite things. Only being connected to thirty-six people doesn’t really do much for the folks at Coke or Starbucks. But a thousand connections, who can all spider off to another thousand, now that’s viral marketing at its finest.”

Clearly, Fagin’s whole suit is simply to make a point – hence the $1.00 amount. The story’s probably already picked up enough coverage in the press for that point to have been heard. Whether or not it will have an impact remains to be seen. Facebook certainly has plenty of more pressing legal matters to attend to:

Facebook Sued for $1.00 After Labeling David Fagin a Spammer
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • http://www.google.com Jack

    I am so glad someone finally has the balls to say something about the abusive nature of Facebook.. FB has become a bully online and it seems like they can do anything they want in every part of the world without any consequence. this is a letter i wrote to facebook a while back, but they never answered me:

    “Dear Facebook

    I thought you cared about my privacy. why are you selling my phone number, personal address and other personal information to third parties? I can’t believe you lately.. Will you ever Let me See Who’s Viewed my Profile? Will Facebook ever offer a feature like LinkedIn’s, where you can see who has viewed your profile? why don’t you want me to be able to keep track of who views my profile? why FB? I thought we were friends. Why do you allow groups to add me without permission?? and the groups seem to always spam my email account once I am in the group, not cool FB, not cool at all!! who is the spammer now! Why do you allow others to tag me on pictures I dont want? why can’t I opt-out of such service? I get tagged to all sort of inappropriate images or images that I dont want to be associated with.. why do you allow this FB?? Why FB?? Why did you change on me? why did you change the profiles?? Why didn’t you give me the option to go back to the classic format?? do you want me to be social? Do you want me to make Friends? then why do you block me from adding the friends you suggested yourself?? Am I too social to be social? Or are you too good for me to be in your system? I look forward to your reply.”

  • David

    I have contacted David Fagin requesting that he consider seeking class-action status for this lawsuit, because I believe there are thousands of legitimate FB users–including me–who are being subjected to this arbitrary and infuriating abuse by Zuckerberg & Co. I’m amazed by the sheer audacity of “Facelessbook” when they practically order you to “add as friend” all these people who you already know, and then when you do it, they block you and accuse you of being a spammer and of violating their rules! This is a Catch-22 situation.

    I cannot fathom the business model upon which this empire is built where innocent users follow the directions the company gives them and then are accused of unethical if not illegal acts for doing so! Worse yet, they invite users who feel they’ve been unjustly accused to submit explanations but it seems that no one inside the company reads these appeals for help. In any other industry the Better Business Bureau would be on their case in a minute. Is this just a glimpse of a future world where a small number of mega-corporations control key aspects of our economic and social lives yet deprive us of any rights to seek redress for legitimate grievances?

    I would love nothing more than to “vote with my feet” and abandon Facelessbook altogether–if only there were an alternative service to join that has similar features and user base. Zuckerberg is fast becoming the Rockefeller of the 21st century. Accountable to no one, he has become too big to fail…

    This has become an example of where the ‘free market’ doesn’t work and governmental regulation has to step in. Facelessbook is becoming an arrogant monopoly that the Justice Department should be investigating for its anticompetitive practices.

  • Angry

    I think if everyone participated in suing facebook it would make more sense, after all there are a lot of people that are called spammer by facebook, and this is called insulting.
    I think making friends is one of the main human rights and facebook is depriving many people form their certain right.
    an Online petition might be a good point to start.

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom