U.N. Considering Global Internet Tax for U.S.-Based Websites

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:

U.N. Considering Global Internet Tax for U.S.-Based Websites
[ Search]

Should some of the largest online content providers have to pay up in order to continue to reach the global market? The United Nations thinks so, according to some leaked documents obtained by WCITLeaks.org, and such a tax will be up for debate this December when the agency’s International Telecommunications Union convenes for the World Conference on International Telecommunications in Dubai.

The tax would have adverse effects on companies such as Google, Apple, and Facebook that have thrived off of their access to the rest of the world. Levying a tax on these companies so that they can continue to maintain a presence throughout the world has raised concern among industry observers about how the ITU’s internet tax would diminish the communication outlets around the world and hamper the openness of the internet, leaving developing countries in isolation.

On page 36, Section CWG/54/6.14 of the draft of the document dated June 6, 2012, the proposed regulation states, “Countries are free to levy fiscal taxes on international telecommunication services in accordance with their national laws.” Later, in CWG/54/6/6.16, the document continues:

National authorities are free to impose taxes on all telecommunications traffic, whether incoming or outgoing. However, such taxes should be reasonable and the proceeds should be directed where possible at the development of the industry. Regarding double taxation, Member States are encouraged to cooperate within the framework of bilateral, juridical double taxation treaties under which taxation arrangements are pre-determined by the terms of the treaty so as to protect against the risk of double taxation and avoidance or evasion of tax liability.

The two policy analysts behind WCITLeaks spoke to CNET about the dangers of the ITU’s proposed tax, suggesting that the attempt to tax U.S.-based internet companies is likely born of greedy ambitions but carries with it the collateral threat to free speech.

Eli Dourado, a research fellow who founded WCITLeaks along with Jerry Brito, told CNET this afternoon that the documents show that Internet taxes represent “an attractive revenue stream for many governments, but it probably is not in the interest of their people, since it would increase global isolation.”

Dourado hopes to continue posting internal ITU documents, and is asking for more submissions. “We hope that shedding some light on them will help people understand what’s at stake,” he says.

The tax proposal comes by way of the European Telecommunications Network Operators Association, a lobbyist group that represents several companies throughout different countries that would love to see a the tax proposal ratified.

Last week, Vint Cerf, one of the architects of the internet, testified before the U.S. Congress about his growing concern about the U.N.’s ambitions to regulate the internet and the organization’s vulnerability to the influences of countries that aren’t so much in favor of having an open internet, like China, Russia, India, and others. Deciding to tax companies that have championed the free exchange of information on the internet would be a covert yet decisive victory for those interests that wish to undermine web’s openness.

U.N. Considering Global Internet Tax for U.S.-Based Websites
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • http://www.cowcam.com Sam Critchley

    Er, hello? The headline says “U.N. Considering Global Internet Tax for U.S.-Based Websites”, but nowhere does it say that the UN or the ITU are considering any kind of tax, merely that countries are free to tax according to their own national regulations. At no point does it say anything about U.S.-based websites either.

  • Brian C

    If this occurs – then the countries that go into this program need to (and most likely will) be boycotted by users across the world. And if the US adopts this concept for the Internet – then I personally am going back to a dial-up BBS system. There is no way that I will take part in a centralized government agent taking control over the data flow and profiteering – its just another way to mandate taxes on economies which are in peril. We already have an economic crisis – this will most certainly drop the bomb. But there is absolutely no way that I am going to use the internet if it is regulated by any government – this would infringe against both civil and constitutional freedoms which I am not about to give up.

  • http://www.r-evolution-tv.com/ Henri H

    It may not say that they will impose taxes on US based websites but you know what will happen with this. it will just open the gates to impose more rules, regulations taking away more freedoms and rights AND freedom of speech on the net will be one step further away! This is not a good sign! anything that “regulates” the stream of information will be used against us, mark my words! We have lost more rights since 9/11 then we gained in the 100 years before that!

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom