Justice Department Objects To Google Books Settlement
DOJ cites antitrust concerns in several areas3 comments Friday, February 5, 2010
The amended Google Books settlement agreement (ASA) has not impressed the U.S. Department of Justice. A statement the organization issued late yesterday praised the idea of making rare books widely available, but also maintained that there are a number of problems with the proposed deal.
The DOJ said, "Under the ASA as proposed, Google would remain the only competitor in the digital marketplace with the rights to distribute and otherwise exploit a vast array of works in multiple formats. Google also would have the exclusive ability to exploit unclaimed works (including so-called 'orphan works') without risk of liability. The ASA's pricing mechanisms, though in some respects much improved, also continue to raise antitrust concerns."
As a result, the DOJ doesn't want the current deal to go forward. The organization concluded, "At this time, in the view of the United States, the public interest would best be served by direction from the Court encouraging the continuation of settlement discussions between the parties and, if the Court so chooses, guidance as to those aspects of the ASA that need to be addressed."
So it looks like Google will have to go back to the figurative drawing board again. Enough groups have objected to the amended settlement agreement to make the situation almost comical, and with the DOJ on their side, it's hard to imagine Judge Denny Chin won't acknowledge their concerns.
Judge Chin, representing the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, should get the chance to voice his opinion at a hearing on February 18th.
Related Articles:
> Stanford Endorses Google Books Settlement
> Google Bows To Chinese Authors On Book Scanning
> Three More Groups Rally Against Google Books Settlement
Publish A Comment
-
The Role of Information Architecture in SEO
When you think about SEO, information architecture is not always one... -
What Mobile Trends Are Telling Us
A recent Nielsen report reveals some interesting information... -
Bad Reputation? Google Says Change Your Name
In a recent interview with the Wall Street Journal, Google CEO Eric... -
Transitioning to the Cloud
The second annual Mimecast Cloud Adoption Survey conducted by...
Submit Your Article




























I think it's about time a
I think it's about time a judge somewhere delivered a serious wake up call to those digital vampires at google.
They would soon be up in arms and running for the courts if someone decided to redistribute some of their copyrighted software without their permission wouldn't they?
I have been thinking recently, does google even have a right to index anything they haven't been specifically invited to (i.e url submitted to them by the owner)? One could say that googlebot is tantamount to a digital poacher everytime it visits a site that hasn't been specifically submitted to them for the purposes of indexing given that website owners have no control over who links to their sites and many folk out there will tell you that google regularly ignores robots.txt files and noindex tags.