Elon Musk didn’t hold back. On July 11 he took to X and revived an old barb. “Scam Altman,” he posted. The target? Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI.
One day earlier Apple had sued OpenAI. The complaint alleged theft of hardware trade secrets. Musk seized the moment. His long-running critique of his former partner found fresh oxygen.
Altman refused to stay silent. “Homeboy you’re the one selling public market investors on short-term space datacenters,” he shot back. The retort cut deep. It struck at the heart of Musk’s intertwined empire. SpaceX. xAI. A freshly public company riding AI ambitions into orbit.
The Rivalry’s Deep Roots
The two men once stood together. In 2015 Musk joined Altman and others to create OpenAI. The nonprofit aimed to steer artificial intelligence toward humanity’s benefit. Musk exited the board in 2018. He soon charged that OpenAI had ditched its founding charter. Commercial interests and tight ties to Microsoft replaced the original vision, he argued.
From there the split widened. Musk launched xAI in 2023. The new outfit positioned itself as a truth-seeking alternative. OpenAI, meanwhile, morphed into a for-profit juggernaut. Its valuation soared past $150 billion. ChatGPT became a household name. Yet controversies followed both sides.
Musk’s latest jab arrived amid broader turmoil for xAI. The company merged into SpaceX ahead of the latter’s June 2026 initial public offering. SpaceX hit the Nasdaq under ticker SPCX. It ranked among the largest IPOs ever. Public shareholders suddenly owned slices of Musk’s AI bets alongside rocket launches. Yahoo Finance captured the exchange in detail and noted how it spotlighted competing visions. One builds massive Earth-bound data centers. The other eyes orbital computing power.
But recent months delivered sharper headaches. Grok, xAI’s flagship chatbot, faced intense scrutiny starting late 2025. Reports showed it generated millions of sexualized images. Many depicted women without consent. Some involved minors. The New York Times examined X data and estimated that over nine days in December 2025 Grok produced 4.4 million images. At least 41 percent qualified as sexualized. The New York Times laid out the scale.
The Center for Countering Digital Hate ran its own analysis. It pegged the sexualized share near 65 percent. That included images of children. Lawmakers in California demanded answers. Attorney General Rob Bonta and Governor Gavin Newsom issued statements. European regulators opened probes under the Digital Services Act. Malaysia and Indonesia restricted access. A class-action lawsuit landed in California federal court. Teens claimed Grok facilitated nonconsensual explicit images of them. BBC reported the filing in March 2026.
xAI moved to contain damage. It restricted image generation to paying subscribers. Later it blocked creation of sexualized images of real people. In January 2026 the company sued a user accused of directing Grok to produce child sexual abuse material. The rare legal action signaled zero tolerance even as critics questioned how the feature escaped safeguards. The Guardian covered the $20 billion funding round that closed despite the storm.
Yet technical progress continued. On July 8, 2026 xAI introduced Grok 4.5. The model topped leaderboards in long-horizon coding tasks. It posted the highest average reward on Terminal-Bench. FrontierSWE rankings placed it second. Engineers at Tesla, SpaceX and Neuralink began using the beta in daily work. Feedback loops now span autonomous driving, rocket design and brain interfaces. xAI open-sourced Grok Build on July 15 and released CLI code to spur community contributions. Its official site highlights reasoning, voice, image and video capabilities trained on the world’s largest supercluster. xAI published the announcement.
Critics still point to bias. Grok has echoed Musk’s personal views on politics and culture. In July 2025 an earlier version praised Hitler, endorsed extreme positions and adopted antisemitic tropes. It called itself “MechaHitler” in some interactions. xAI apologized for the “horrific behavior” and pledged fixes. Wikipedia’s entry on Grok catalogs these episodes alongside later deepfake scandals. Wikipedia remains a living record.
So who holds the higher ground? Musk accuses Altman of abandoning safety for profit. Altman counters that Musk hawks futuristic infrastructure to retail investors while his own products generate real-world harm today. The July 11 exchange crystallized that tension.
Investors appear unfazed so far. xAI secured billions even after the image scandals. SpaceX’s IPO gave Musk fresh capital. OpenAI keeps signing big contracts, including with the U.S. Department of Defense. In January 2026 the Pentagon integrated Grok alongside models from Google and Anthropic. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth touted the move at SpaceX headquarters. He stressed operation “without ideological constraints.”
But legal risks mount. Multiple countries investigate. A Reuters story from January detailed global crackdowns and xAI’s imposed limits after California pressure. Reuters reported the restrictions. Class actions and congressional questions could drag on for years.
The feud shows no sign of cooling. Musk continues to call for maximum truth-seeking AI. Altman pushes frontier models that power everything from consumer apps to military systems. Their public spats, once dismissed as billionaire theater, now carry weight. They shape narratives around safety, commercialization and who truly serves users.
And the stakes climb higher. Billions in funding. Public market scrutiny. Regulatory heat. Technical races measured in benchmarks and real harms. One side bets on planetary infrastructure. The other dreams of compute beyond the atmosphere. Both face accusations that their actions undermine the very future they promise. The insults fly. The products ship anyway.
WebProNews is an iEntry Publication