SOPA Blackout Set For January 18th: Here’s All The Info

    January 17, 2012
    Josh Wolford
    Comments are off for this post.

Over the weekend, the Stop Online Piracy Act was dealt a major blow as the legislation was delayed until “outstanding concerns” have been addressed. SOPA will not move forward in the House as the official vote was been cancelled and the bill has been yanked from the floor. Representative and SOPA opponent Darrell Issa cheered this as a win for the internet community – but he warned that SOPA’s Senate cousin PIPA is still a major concern.

He’s right, and SOPA is still a concern as well. While it has been delayed, SOPA is not dead (just ask SOPA author Lamar Smith). It is entirely possible that SOPA could resurrect once a “consensus is reached.” SOPA must be destroyed while vulnerable.

And presumably, that’s why many sites will still participate in a scheduled blackout on Wednesday, January 18th to protest the legislation.

Update: 12:00 AM January 18 – View Live Protests:
Boing Boing

Do you support sites like Wikipedia going dark in protest of SOPA and PIPA? Or do you feel that it’s the wrong move? Let us know in the comments.

Here are some of the bigger sites that will officially go dark on the 18th:

  • reddit
  • Wikipedia
  • Mozilla
  • Failblog, rest of the Cheezburger Network
  • Boing Boing
  • WordPress
  • MoveOn.org
  • TwitPic
  • Minecraft.net
  • Riot Games
  • Epic Games
  • 38 Studios
  • Red 5 Studios
  • Google will be changing their homepage
  • Imgur
  • Tor Project
  • Miro
  • iSchool at Syracuse University
  • Oreilly.com
  • Good Old Games
  • Free Press
  • Mojang
  • XDA Developers
  • Destructoid
  • Good.is

Smaller sites can get in on the protest as well. A site, sopastrike.com, has been set up by the Fight for the Future non-profit. It allows anyone with a website to join the strike. The site’s list of all registered blackout participants contains hundreds of small websites.

If you want to participate in the blackout, you can use the Simple Stop SOPA WordPress plugin. It will blackout your site and show the following message in white:

This site has been blocked in protest of the SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect IP Act) two bills which will allow the government to censor the internet. Find out more at americancensorship.org or the video below. This website will return at 8pm.

It will also show this video about SOPA and PIPA. If you haven’t already seen it, it’s a nice video that explains the dangers of the legislation:

If you want a little more control on your blackout, you can try this other WordPress plugin.

Googler Pierre Far made a timely Google+ post Monday evening, coyly referencing the fact that sometimes webmasters feel the need to take their site offline for a day because of “server maintenance or as political protest.” He mentions this action as the most important one to take if you plan on having your site go dark for a day:

1. The most important point: Webmasters should return a 503 HTTP header for all the URLs participating in the blackout (parts of a site or the whole site). This helps in two ways:

a. It tells us it’s not the “real” content on the site and won’t be indexed.

b. Because of (a), even if we see the same content (e.g. the “site offline” message) on all the URLs, it won’t cause duplicate content issues.

2. Googlebot’s crawling rate will drop when it sees a spike in 503 headers. This is unavoidable but as long as the blackout is only a transient event, it shouldn’t cause any long-term problems and the crawl rate will recover fairly quickly to the pre-blackout rate. How fast depends on the site and it should be on the order of a few days.

You can see the entire list of tips here.

If you don’t own a site and want to spread the word of the blackout via social media, you can use the hashtag #sopastrike or #stopsopa all day. BlackoutSopa.org also allows for you to change your Twitter pic to one of three images – either a smaller “Stop SOPA” banner under your pic, a total “STOP SOPA” image or a simple blackout.

There is still a day until the SOPA blackout, which means the window is closing for other big-name sites to join in. Having Reddit and Wikipedia down is going to be a huge deal, and it would only get bigger if other social sites joined the blackout party.

But it appears that not everybody is joining the party. In response to Radar correspondent Alex Howard asking him if he had the “cojones” to join Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia in the blackout, Twitter CEO Dick Costolo had this to say:

@digiphile @jayrosen_nyu that’s just silly. Closing a global business in reaction to single-issue national politics is foolish. 17 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto

He elaborated:

@digiphile Not shutting down a service doesn’t equal not taking the proper stance on an issue. We’ve been very clear about our stance 17 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto

Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales agrees that Twitter should not go dark in protest –

@dickc Can you confirm your support for Wikipedia’s protest? I agree with you that twitter should not go dark. 14 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto

He makes a distinction – that Twitter needs to be used to organize the protests. It’s a no-brainer that shutting down giant social media sites like Twitter and Facebook would severely hamper the ability to communicate about the protest. But if the purpose of the blackout is awareness, to send out a warning message, then nothing would be as jolting as seeing a site like Twitter go dark for an entire day.

Not all SOPA opponents feel that a blackout it a good way to tackle the unpopular legislation. As PandoDaily’s Paul Carr writes,

Arguing that a one-day closure reminds everyone of the importance of net freedom is like burning down one church to underscore the importance of the First Amendment for all of the others. Even if the shut-down did send an effective message, it’s still not Wikipedia’s call to make. If you ask the entire world for money to stay live, then you owe the entire world the courtesy of staying live, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

He also stresses that Wikipedia should stay neutral on policy issues, as they are dedicated to staying impartial in every other facet of the site. Jimmy Wales has responded to this concern as well:

@andrewsmatt Articles must remain neutral. The community need not, not when the future of the Internet is at stake. 13 hours ago via web · powered by @socialditto

So the English version of Wikipedia will be inaccessible for the purposes of article retrieval from 5am GMT to 5pm GMT on Wednesday. All visitors will see an open letter asking that they contact their representatives about SOPA/PIPA. Wales told the Telegraph:

“The general sentiment seemed to be that US law, as it impacts the internet, can affect everyone.”

Do you think that Wikipedia has a duty to stay neutral on the SOPA/PIPA issue? Or do they have a duty to take a stance because the legislation threatens the internet as a whole? Let us know in the comments.

Although SOPA was dealt a crushing blow this weekend, do you think that the demonstration is necessary to show people the real cost of internet censorship, so maybe legislation like SOPA won’t get this far in the future? Or do you think that blacking out a popular site for an entire day is too much, or even counterproductive? Do you think that it will work in swaying any SOPA supporters? Let us know in the comments.

  • http://www.jacksononthemoon.com Sharon J

    Not sure if it will help the cause, but what it will do is make many people aware of the dangers of a bill like this, people who have not been paying attention. So the spin off will be good, I think. I wonder if GoDaddy is considering it or (gasp) Google?

    • pj

      go daddy is one of the few who support sopa. go daddy.com has been strongly boycotted as a result

      • Jonas

        Thats BS. As a customer of Godaddy i opened a case with support asking them to disable any autorenewal i had enabled at the end of my contracts as a protest against their first stand on SOPA. As more customers teamed up against it, godaddy changed their standpoint from positive, to semi-agreeing, to reject it until something commonly agreed could be made up. The only people fighting Godaddy now is people who wants to gain some of their customer-base.

        • TZ

          So that’s not BS, that’s information which is not up to date.

          Why are you so agressive when you had exactly the same reaction against Go Daddy ?

        • robopanda333

          well that’s because all the people already fought go daddy. honestly i think that if go daddy wants people to come back they should consider blacking out.

      • bradon

        Godaddy actually recently withdrew their support due to economic backlash from… well… their customer… Wikipedia.

  • Me

    I think it’s stupid. The people who will be effected by this aren’t in DC making dumb decisions. The people in DC probably can’t even pronounce wikipedia. I’ll just avoid those sites who choose to do this, Wednesday and in the future. I’ll go to different sites.

    • MeIsADumbass

      Well Me, you’re not very bright. If they don’t do this and try to stop it you won’t have the choice of not going to those sites because your DC people will make sure they no longer exist.

      • Kymm

        That’s right. The idea of blocking access to these sites is to make the American People aware that these sites could be shut down due to this bill. SOPA Blackout is just a taste of what you will experience in it’s future internet. You should get mad, and irritated that this blackout is happening, then write your local congress and tell them to shut SOPA down, so you don’t have to experience it 1,000,000,000 X’s fold. That’s the point.

        • prince mac

          exactly the point. the whole reason for the blackout is for people to know about SOPA, incredibly enough not even a quarter of internet users know what SOPA is or what they plan to do and will eventually get to do.

        • Me

          If that was the point why not post something on the website for more than one day? Have a redirect page when the person first gets to the site and then they can X out after reading it and then do what they went to the site to do. The person can then contact whoever their elected official is if they choose to.
          I agree with the intent, just not the method.

          • robopanda333

            well that method would just be slightly annoying, most people wouldn’t read it.
            this way generates noise and lots of it. i would love for google to do the same thing, because only the most ignorant idiotic people would not notice, and the news would have to report it.
            but as it currently stands i think it is great.

      • Me

        Don’t question my brightness by my opinion here. You don’t even know me. And they aren’t MY DC people. Just because I think this is a dumb move that does little to bother people in DC, doesn’t mean I agree with the bill or that I even like the people in DC.

        • ReplytoME

          The point is not to bother the people in DC, the point is to get people to realize what this act will do. The method is simply showing a preview of how this bill will affect everyone when they go to use the sites they use everyday. How would a blackout be a dumb move?? That is what this act will do, but a lot longer than just one day. This simply raises awareness.

        • metoo

          People need to know what’s at stake here. The blackout is as much a protest to the bill as it is symbolic of what will come should the bill be passed.
          It’s not about piracy. It’s about losing the only free-space we’ve got.

        • Ryan

          I think it will bother officials in DC a lot. From what I understand they are posting phone numbers of reps in DC so people will contact them. I’m sure the phones will be off the hook tomorrow.

    • rowenacherry

      “affected”. Effected is something entirely different.

    • Michael

      This is the trouble with people today. Americans are more than willing to allow Washington politicians, who are bought and paid for by the very companies pushing the bill, to walk all over their rights because they are too damn ignorant to pay attention to the very things that effect the majority.

      Heads up “Me,” There is another bill in the works, The Protecting Children From Internet Pornographers Act of 2011, that will force your ISP to track your every move online, including collecting and storing your bank account and credit card number[s]. As if there are not enough ways for hackers to get a hold of that info.

    • Instantaneous

      Good luck finding sources of free information. All search engines oppose it (and that’s ALL search engines, my friend.)

  • Td

    Stop scaring people…it will stop people from stealing other peoples work and making money from it. Like Googles youtube and it 99% stolen content. Thats why they r against it. It’ll kill their fat money cow!
    If u were an music writer and some stole your new cd and put it on yt then no one bought it bc they got it free u would be fine w/that? No u would be all for it.
    Avg People wont notice one way or another. I could care less either way but just giving my opinion.

    • FjKnight

      Idiot, don’t you see? If they pass this, it sets a precedent. And then they pass another law and another, and then pretty soon there is nothing left to enjoy because the freedom that was once there is gone.

      SOPA seeks to stop the freedom to share joy. How? The way it is worded would prevent you from uploading video game footage of you enjoying and sharing your gameplay over YouTube. Want to sing your favorite song while jamming on a guitar and post it on YouTube? Nope, not if SOPA passes.

      • rowenacherry

        The “freedom” isn’t there now. It is already illegal to “share” copyrighted movies, music, games, e-books. Check out the wording of the DMCA.

        “Fair Use” only applies to small portions, not entire works. “First Sale” rights apply to one original paper and one original vinyl, not to infinite numbers of copies. “First Amendment” protects your right to original speech of your own creation, not to publishing copies of someone else’s.

        • Frank

          You sound like you know what your talking about, because you are exactly right.

    • Kymm

      More people are being made into serious musicians and artists due to the art of sharing on sites like YouTube, and Facebook. Take Justin Bieber… He would be nothing without it. I think successful artists are not in the least concerned about people sharing their work…. It’s the record companies, and Hollywood execs that raped the artists wallet to begin with, who suffer from sharing sites… It’s no different than the invention of the recordable VCR or cassette player… neither of which shut down the music industry… They’re just too lazy to integrate, and find a useful way to connect to their audience via sharing, an all of this new fangled technology…. Replace those execs with a couple of young whipper snappers, and they’ll show you how to get the work done!

      • rm

        this is the real issue – the big “old school” media moguls see their monopolistic legally mandated dynasty threatened by the freedom of new artists to get published without them on the web so they want control of it and all the $$ coming in the future – don’t buy their story – it’s time for their way of doing biz to go and the new generations of talent to find their own way to capitalize the revenue from their creations without having to give most all of it to SONY and the others

        • http://GrowMap.com Gail Gardner

          It is that and much, much more. The major media used to easily control almost EVERYTHING the public saw EVERYWHERE. Now they don’t – although the way Google is favoring big brands and those who agree with the party line and burying alternative viewpoints they DO have alternate plans besides SOPA, PIPA and COPPA.

          With this law ANYONE can complain about ANY site and potentially have it disappear – along with their access to PayPal or any other payment gateway.

          The potential for abuse is HUGE. Have an unethical competitor? Hand them a way to get rid of you. Write the Truth as you see it? Hand anyone who disagrees with you a way to force your hosting company to take you offline.

          Over time, we could systematically lose all independent and dissenting voices and all alternatives to what the few want us to believe and eventually end up with ONE store where all the formerly free but now totally enslaved must shop.

          I am NOT exaggerating – and the overwhelming reaction to SOPA should tell you that many others are responding because they see the same dangers I do.

    • BT

      I dont think you grasp how that actually HURTS many artists out there, as well as many people who make a living reviewing movies or games.

      Read up on it a tad bit more, and dont accept their sermon at face value. They will control what we see and what we post.

      Freedom will end on the internet.

      • Jakob

        We don’t care is people ‘steal’ albums through peer-to-peer networks, or in any other way.
        Artists only make about .5-2% of all albums’ value, per sale.
        The way that artists make money is by touring and selling tickets (and believe me, thats a LOT of money).

        I, personally, want to see Verisign join to protest, and pull down their two Root name servers. That would get people’s attention.

    • Gloq

      …the record companies are making all the money and trying to manipulate the government to extort artists and consumers alike

    • http://godaddy.com gochestatee

      I am opposed to piracy and to stealing music, arts, games and software. Game code is as much an art as album covers and should be protected.
      I also support free speech and due process and do not want my website to “disappear” because its IP address is next to the address of someone hosting pirated works.
      I don’t understand everything about SOPA, but I do know it opens the door for many more regulations.

    • Replyto Td

      But yet you like to be able to post the comment you just were able to post? Would you like to continue posting freely on the web? No one is trying to scare anyone, these are facts. If this is passed next thing you know we will be just like China.

      • rowenacherry

        Well, Todd, there are sites (not this one, obviously since my posts are posting) that censor comments they don’t like.

        • http://GrowMap.com Gail Gardner

          Yes that is true – there ARE sites that censor comments and even appear to let us share content but don’t really share it when it is not what they want to get more visibility.

          The key is that today we can choose to stop reading and commenting on those sites that censor us and support those that don’t. If this atrocity passes there will eventually not BE any alternative sites that don’t censor us or blogs like mine that tell the Truth and annoy the powers that be.

          They don’t like people like me and I guarantee our blogs will be among the first to disappear. Sadly, most of the public will not notice or say a word even if their favorite sites go dark. Only if you have enough people to scream loud enough will you MAYBE come back. This law makes that less likely unless you have major financial backing to pay for legal representation.

    • Michael

      @ Td

      If you don’t have an issue with a bill that would give the RIAA [for example] the power to shut done any website because it may have a link to a site containing copyrighted material, without having to go to court, then you are right… everyone is just banging the drum in an effort to “scare” people.

    • Trevor

      You have to think, one justin beiber song made more money then all of the beatles music together, do they need more money, and without sites like youtube, facebook, ect the economy would be even worse off

  • http://www.retail4u.com michael blum

    I think if you commit to your cause than you have to be persistent. Once a month?

  • anonymous

    Hhhhhmmm. I wonder if Google left their balls in China, when they were helping them censor *their* citizens?

    • rowenacherry

      Google doesn’t have balls. It has sacks of money.

  • ericb

    We could all just not get online on wednesday, too.

    • ericb

      That video that you posted on youtube with your kid singing happy birthday to his dad stationed in iraq? thats a copyrighted song. Thats a crime, you’re a criminal. Criminals are terrorists, that site is blocked. Now it is time to search your PC for other copyrighted songs. Hand it over, asshole.

      • Quasi

        Well, Happy Birthday to You is public domain, so that’s fine. But the video of the veteran surprising his little girl in school with Butterfly Kisses in the background, that can get you up to five years in prison.

        • Anonymous

          Actually, HB is not public domain

          • Stephen

            Yeah there is a reason no restaurant sings the actual Happy Birthday song. They can’t.

        • SorkinFan

          Any fan of good television would know that Happy Birthday is NOT public domain. The representatives of Patty and Mildred Hill (It took TWO people to write that song?!) would have your money in a heartbeat, should you sing it.

  • Criddle

    What ericb said is exactly what will happen if we don’t find a way to stop it. Ron Paul for president 2012.

  • rowenacherry

    What this will show is the level of illiteracy among those against SOPA. How many of you spotted the grammatical error in the message that you all will be displaying on your websites?

    • Lillie

      It doesn’t mean that all SOPA opponents are illiterate because the person who put together the site made a mistake. If we were all supposed to type it in somewhere and a significant percentage of SOPA opponents typed it wrong, that could be cause for concern, but you can’t blame everyone if one person messed up.

      • rowenacherry

        I see that the missing “to” was added.

      • rowenacherry

        No, but it does suggest that persons organizing action against SOPA cannot spell “internet” and cannot tell a transitive verb from an intransitive verb. Why do you trust these people to tell you what is –actually– in the wording of legislation?

        • http://GrowMap.com Gail Gardner

          So arguing over minor grammatical error is more important to you than censorship? We can not expect the one tree people to ever be able to see the forest – much less the planet.

    • Andrew

      Who let you out of the kitchen?

      • Trevor

        yeah get back in the kitchen

      • LOLWHUT

        She may an ignorant douchebag, but no need to act like a chauvinistic fuckwit. This is the fucking 21st century, not the 1800’s. Don’t generalize women and act like an asinine dipshit just because one person is stupid enough to support this bill. How you like it if someone told you to go back and mow the lawn? Not very nice, isnt’ it?

        TL;dr, get out of your parents basement, grow the fuck up, and educate yourself about society. It’s ignorant fucks like you who make me lose hope for humanity, Jesus fucking Christ.

        • U-Can-See-Me


  • William

    we all are in trouble if SOPA does pass because well have nothing left to enjoy our lives basically depend on internet

    • rowenacherry

      Are you saying that your enjoyment of the internet is based on your ability to visit foreign sites dedicated to copyright infringement?

      • Rich

        You embody the arrogance and elitism we all fear will come with the new controls over the internet these overreaching laws will bring.
        Even the most illiterate among us can see this.

        • rowenacherry

          Read the DMCA. It might also be a good idea to read any contract you sign on the internet.

          • Instantaneous

            First Amendment.

            Why give people rights when you’re just going to take them away with bullshit laws? Maybe you don’t understand the CONSEQUENCES (and you don’t, judging by your inability to see LONG TERM), but A) it’s not hard to use a proxy and B) you’re ignoring everything along the lines of what businesses can do. Would you like it if I shut down every business you cared about because of something that MIGHT be copyright infringement? No.

  • P Kuran

    As someone who has independently made films with my own money only to see them proliferated all over the internet for free, I am not only dismayed with congress and Daryl Issa but depressed that people don’t understand that it is STEALING! I am sure Daryl Issa would feel differently if the very thing that made him wealthy, his car alarms, would be stolen and given away for free. Anybody with a business could not stay in business if the very thing that they were selling, had been stolen and given away by others who have no right to do it. The lost income keeps me from being able to finish my next project that I am sure others would like as much as the ones that are pirated and freely distributed on the internet. Many of those pirates think this is about big studios but there are others like me, who invested a lot of time, energy and money into something only to see someone who, with a couple of keystrokes, steals it and gives it away because they feel that the internet gives them some kind of entitlement.

    • rm

      find a better way, one that does not theaten legit sites and the very foundation of the web – go to court and sue them just like you would have to do if they were selling your dvd’s – don’t threaten and take our rights away so you can make an easier buck off your junk

      • Michael

        Well said rm. There are already laws that protect copyright holders.

        • StopStupidLaws

          Exactly. Very well said. The laws exist so use the courts to get your relief. We have to stand up against this wave of insanity that puts profit over freedom. What a terrible trend it is too. The Patriot Act, sections of the NDAA and on and on. And there are plenty more in the making that are even more extreme. This stupidity has got to stop. Soon the internet is becoming a surveillance tool rather than an information resource.

  • Peep

    Why is the main stream media not covering this? This country is screwed

    • robopanda333

      well… lets think about this for a minute, ALL MAIN STREAM MEDIA SUPPORTS SOPA AND PIPA! They don’t want people to know about it.
      This is the main reason i think the blackouts are good, it will be very hard to ignore wiki going black, and the news will have to report on it.

      • Garrilla

        Actually, I first heard about SOPA from Robin Meade on HLN, sister station to CNN.

    • Michael

      CNN is owned by Time Warner, which supports SOPA.

    • http://GrowMap.com Gail Gardner

      The mainstream media wants to control what we see – and they ignore for as long as possible what they don’t want the masses to find out about – which is precisely what SOPA, PIPA, and COPPA are so dangerous.

      Right now you CAN find out what is going on with the Occupy movement even if they won’t cover it – and see videos of what is REALLY happening instead of their “a bunch of insane, stoned hippy anarchists” media spin nonsense.

      If these bills go forward the information we can find today will be systematically removed – and even if they don’t relying on Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc. that are already censoring our activities and burying dissenting viewpoints will mean many will not know there ARE any other viewpoints.

  • http://www.etechlv.com Brian Arredondo

    I support the black out!! If people can’t go 24 hours without Reddit and other sites imagine how much they would hate SOPA and PIPA!

    • http://www.ientry.com/ Josh Wolford

      I support the blackout but I don’t even know if I can go 24 hours without reddit…

  • Killen

    Im all for the protest, i believe everyone should participate.

  • http://www.ameriwebs.net George Snell

    “Hi, I’m from the government. I am here to help you…

    … and to interfere in everything in your life I could possibly intrude into. When I get to the point I can’t interfere any more, I will go back and make up some new rules.”

    • kate

      You don’t get what good government is, that’s the problem with America. It has not had a good government in 40 years, a government free of corporate or militaristic interests….Or perhaps ever!

      Governments in other nations provide cost-effective social programs, legislate on matters the public want to see legislation on, and largely represent the interests of their people. The US is a corrupt festering wound full of over-expenditure to and from special interests groups pushing their own barrel down a slippery slope into a black hole. WTF is your health system?! Paying buerocrats and middlemen to DENY care and administer a mess of layers between public and private systems? We already KNOW in Australia that Private Insurers cost the public purse money and this is why they only make up a small % of people in the system, as large scale hospital policies aimed at reducing waste and better patient outcomes work far better than allowing private interests to dominate healthcare. Australia’s postal system is also one of the most profitable in the world…the US’s is going bankrupt. I don’t know how America can get it SO WRONG…

      Politicians do not obey any sort of allegiance to a party, and for that reason, whore themselves out to the closest business for big cash advances. This is what SOPA is about, it’s about the entertainment industry pushing YET MORE legislation on Washington.

  • http://www.thecollectorshub.com The Collectors Hub

    Bold move and I support them

  • Matt Brady

    I only wish Google and Bing would join the cause!

  • Rickey Morris

    Yes I am taking down my sites as well, and putting up a notice as to why, and fully support all the major sites that are leading the way. Nothing good ever comes from our Governments involvement in Commerce, or regulations, or Taxes.

    • Alison

      Agreed. If people want the government to control everything, they can move to a country that does so. This is America, and here the people fight to preserve freedom in all forms.

      • kate

        America’s problem isn’t government per se it is bad government dominated by corporate interests and a broken party system that does not involve Westminster discipline. If everyone in a party was supposed to toe a party line for the most part, then parties would come up with coherent policies and be less beholden to corporate interests.

        The problem starts when politicians are free to pursue their own corporate interests and start getting golden handshakes from industry.

        The American Government system is confusing having a free and fair government compared to regulating against corruption and backhanders from industry.

        This bill is being pushed by Washington, by a politician who could not get away with it if he was part of a Westminster system.

        • kate

          second last para- the confusion comes between “free enterprise” and “free speech” versus free and fair government. That is what I meant.

  • http://ofertasresumidas.com.br/ Compras Coletivas

    We all have to do EVERYTHING possible to stop them wanting to Censure the internet. This is simply ridiculous and has to be stopped!

  • j preston

    The net should not go dark.
    A better move would be to put anti SOPA/PITA content on every page.


    • http://www.ientry.com/ Josh Wolford

      The participating sites are putting anti-SOPA materials on their pages in lieu of normal operations. For instance, Wikipedia isn’t just going offline, but instead of normal functions, each page will have an anti-SOPA message and a plea to contact representatives.

    • rb

      I kinda agree. SOPA is mostly a US internal problem, not completely though, and “going dark” is affecting the whole world. Many of these sites have international visitors/focus and very little has been discussed about how non-US netizens might be affected.

      • kate

        I’m from Australia and I disgree with you.

        Awareness needs to be raised in Australia so Australians can put pressure on our government to pressure the Obama administration to maintain its stance.

        That, or pressure the Obama Administration to stop bugging us and shut up about a proposed filter designed to stop child porn and other illegal content.

  • rm

    Absolutely – there is a huge “land grab and resource take over” being perpetrated on us by special interest corp players – the “old school media” – they want the web now and the $$ they can monopolize on it – they will try anything including negative “there are problems on the web” legislation to steal it from legit smaller business usages … yes there are problems but they have the same problems in other forms of media transfer and they don’t get such draconian laws passed there do they? This is more about who will own the future of the web than the issues they are promulgating to the public and congress…

  • http://simpleits.net david

    Yes, I support anything to block these or any similar bills!

  • james
    • james


      • jim

        NDAA will sack you and put you in the clink for “low level terrorism” Why aren’t we talking about NDAA as well as SOPA?

        It’s just as bad.

  • http://politicalavenger.com David Foster

    I really feel that they ALL need to black out for even half a day to wake people up because people have become so complacent and seem to think that nothing is going to affect them. I think that it sends a powerful message and would actually cause people to start paying more attention…so come on Twitter and Facebook…grow some balls and stand with the rest of us!

    • http://www.ientry.com/ Josh Wolford

      The argument against Twitter and Facebook going dark is that they are communication channels that would help the protest by staying open – meaning people can share things across the networks.

      But the counter-argument to that is “well, so is reddit – and they are doing it.”

  • William

    Go Dark!!!! This will get the attention of the non-believers!

  • http://www.evil-root.com evil-root

    This is important to crush look what happens when the gov’t get’s it’s nose in the middle of things it has no business meddling in

  • http://www.islandheat.com Jeffrey Cartwright

    Take action and a call to join the proper way to deal with new laws Hire a team to fight the legislation. Going dark does not achieve a purpose other than like a child making a temper tantrum when they do not get what they want. Fight back do not cry and roll over by going dark. I have a DOLLAR to donate to the cause and I am sure millions of other online business would also donate to a lobbyist fund and legal team to fight for our and my rights.

  • http://sites.google.com/site/justsayingmypiece/ Charlie

    I guess I really don’t know enough about the details of SOPA (et al.), so I think I’ll forego comment on the nuts and bolts of it. Suffice it to say that if some of the biggest sites on the Internet are getting “antsy”, for whatever their reasons, I’m at least ‘suspicious’ about SOPA, for sure.

    That said, my main hope for the Internet is that it will NEVER be squelched the way so many other platforms and venues are these days. I am also a realist, and I know my hopes might not be enough to keep it “free” and unencumbered from governmental interference…but I’m willing to voice my distaste and, hopefully, let others know I support FREEDOM…and if SOPA infringes on my FREEDOM, I’m against it vehemently. I’m just sayin’…!

  • craig

    Yes I think a blackout is the right move…there needs to be big action taken against this big than a blackout but its a good signal to send

  • Watching the Wheels

    The public p*ssing contest between the tech world, the world of tangible business and government, is doing little more than inconveniancing me.

    I feel that the techies at large could have done much mor in terms of real respect when dealing with people who had issues with them and the entirty of this COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED!!!

    I do NOT appreciate the techno-nrds trying to agitate me into joining into their battles.

    If EVERYONE practiced the respect that they themselves would like to receive NONE OF THIS WOULD BE GOING DOWN NOW!!!

    IF Disney says DO NOT ?”help”? me gain exposure, take them at their word.

    IF ntertainers say leave my stuff alone, take them at their word.

    IF China has said back the F off, MAYBE,… Google should have taken them at their word.

    Attempting to blackmail me, or to coerce me into fighting a tech battle, or for the VC’s behind the tech world need to hint at more outsourcing of American jobs, ON PRINCIPAL, I will stand with the other side.

    Personally, the world got along just fine before these nasty machines, and I feel that in many ways “tech” has caused more harm than good.

    • Andrew

      So toss your computer and shut up. Some of us find the net useful, and care.

      • Trevor

        do you understand what big sites do for jobs and the economy, throw you computer away, you are obviously ignorant.

  • http://portlandinternetdesign.com John Ellis

    It has to happen. We need to send the message. If we do nothing… SOPA will return and continue to be a threat. If we take a strong stand now and do a web, “show of force” we will send the message that SOPA will not be tolerated.

    The Government works for us… supposedly. The louder the message from the “people”, the better chance we have at the Government listening.

    The web seems to be the only place we can affect change these days. Let’s use it as much as we can.

  • http://cghearn.com cghearn

    It’s an excellent idea. I don’t think the government will necessarily take notice, but it may cause enough people who use it daily to speak up who may not have before.

  • http://teddybearspersonalized.com Steven H

    The webmasters on the internet have always voiced disapproval by going black. I’ve been an isp since 94, so going black is nothing new to me. It’s always been an effective way of shaking up the web. SOPA is such an ignorant attempt to control the internet, favor the largest players and crush competition (the little guys). Thank you Wikipedia!!!



  • http://writersoftheriogrande.com Edgar Clinton

    It’s a good move. let’s not let up. The control freaks certainly won’t

  • http://katieschwartz.com Katie Schwartz

    I think it’s AWESOME. I wish more big sites and search engines, and portals should get involved. The only way to invoke massive change is by all of the biggest names online getting involved.

    Bravo to:
    Failblog, rest of the Cheezburger Network
    Boing Boing

    for having the courage to speak out by blacking out.


  • Nighteyesv

    I wouldn’t have approved had they done this months ago but we’re down to a few days to raise awareness so extreme measures are required.Some may consider this the equivelent of burning a church to protest restrictions on the first amendment but the church isn’t going to burn just be closed for a day and that is an excellent way to raise awareness and show people what they can look forward to if this law does go through though on a far wider scale.

  • https://sites.google.com/site/chasecanade/ chase canadé

    Yup – I support them. i believe Youtube and Vimeo should join in as they would be greatly affected.

    Everyone that wants freedom of the net should join in actually.

    It’s actually nice to see people stand up for something again. Instead of always laying down.

  • Michael Burbank

    I strongly support the blackout!

  • http://www.robZtv.com robZ

    This issue goes well beyond use of incidental copyrighted music and imagery in your home movie or instructional video. Logos/trademarks and many landmarks (Seattle Space Needle, for example) are intellectual/private property and to portray them requires clearance–which can usually be had for a price as long as the owner doesn’t object to the portrayal of their property (you can hash out the details with their lawyers). So, that youtube clip of your kids goofing in front of the Space Needle wearing Nike sneakers (swoosh!), Mariners T-shirts, sipping on Cokes while a car passes in the background with its windows down playing just enough of a pop song to be recognizable could get you (even today) a takedown notice unless you get (i.e., pay for) clearance from at least five different companies. You can claim fair use but that bar keeps getting raised, especially if your work attracts a lot of attention. SOPA will only have a chilling effect on free expression. It saves the copyright/trademark holders the hassle of going after individuals; instead, they put pressure on websites to police themselves. If passed and enforced, you can bet the websites will go beyond what’s expected just to be on the safe side. Through SOPA the entertainment biz hopes to avoid unfavorable outcomes such as Smith v. Summit Entertainment LLC and Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.

    So, is webpronews.com going to black out?

  • http://parellic.blogspot.com Mike Smith

    SOPA = censorship. We must stop anything that damages free speech on the Internet. Otherwise we will have the Chinese system, which means you can only see what the Government wants you to see. Freedom is the only way forward. America is the land of the FREE – don’t ever forget it!

  • Doe Ercolano

    I support the cause because no one really understands how much every one depends on these sites. Government included. And quite frankly; I am sick of government sticking there nose in every movement that anyone does…. most we can thank Obama for. I can hardly wait until November!!

    • aj

      Heck Yeah!

  • Mimi
  • David Thobaben

    Its the wrong move because the websites that go dark is just what the government wants.They should not play into their hands.Thats what the government wants
    is for sites to go dark.That way they can exploit their censorship and push their cause further.The sites should stay up and fight the government.

  • PIJ

    I think the blackout is the wrong move. A blackout is a move to surrender. Never give up, never surrender.

  • http://www.captaincyberzone.com CaptainCyberzone

    It’s called “emotional thinking”.
    It’s a dumb idea akin to “cutting-off one’s nose to spite one’s face”!
    Punish the users (and yourself) in order to make a political statement?! Hoping to rile the lazy masses into complaining to their corrupted Representatives?
    Why not stay “lit” and post a co-ordinated short essay that educates the users and asks for their action and list the actions that can be taken (Democracy vs. Totalitarianism).

  • http://muzocial.com/en/ Muzocial – William Ward

    This can not be allowed to proceed, the owners of copyright material are in the same position as all owners of property and that is they are required to ensure the security of their property, this means spending the money that will ensure that their property is secure from piracy instead of criminalising ISP and websites and their users so as to aviod the extra expense involved in ensuring they have adequate protection…this is a scam of monumental proportions where the owners of property in the public domain demand all internet users to recognise their copyright over publications, music, content etc without the owners having to legally secure said property…..this never happens in reality yet it may become internet policy…the law if inacted lacks common sense if it proceeds.

    Any changes to the copyright laws should emphasise the owner of the property having to secure copyright material in such away as to not allow it into the public domain….This would sort out their problems with theft.

  • Kristen

    I support the desicion to blackout. I can last 1 day without the sites I love in order for the internet not to be censored.

  • aj

    I would like for More Sites like Google, FB, and Yahoo join as well. We all need to be aware when sopa comes back up. They will try to sneak it in!

  • Brandie

    fully support the blackout!

  • Michael Crowder

    It is their freedom of choice to do so. Enough said.

  • Marilena Noy

    I do support Wikipedia. It is an invasion of privacy if PIPA and SOPA go into law.

  • John


  • http://site-13260684597118389096708619638487.webs.com/ Mimi Neko

    This is rediculous. That`s all I can say about it. They`re trying to take away our freedom of speech.

  • bobbi

    I do not think that shutting down websites as a protest of SOPA & PIPA is a very good idea. I work from home as a medical transcriptionist & use the internet a lot to search for the spelling of medications & other medical terminology.

  • Dennis A Loushe

    Government control over free expression is the dream of statists. They must be stopped or liberty will eventually be replaced with Orwellian distopia.

  • Jay Raney

    I wouldn’t mind if the entire U.S. went dark for 6 hrs. Mr. Costolo needs to quit being a dick and look at the bigger picture. The erosion of personal freedom needs to stop. Our politicians should stick to something they know and stay away from something whose dynamics realign themselves at the nanosecond /picosecond level.

  • http://vizfact.com/ VizFact

    Hard to disagree with either of them. They are right on the money. But having FB go down would be awesome. It would show FB’s support, thus making it more lovable.

  • http://www.last.fm/user/mcg1985/journal Nathan P

    If my sites were up, I’d make them go dark tomorrow in support. As is, I’ll be posting about this on Facebook tomorrow!

    Canada would likely follow any US lead here (they tried following DMCA but protests killed the attempt) so I’ll help my fellow net users protest!

  • yuri


    • http://www.robZtv.com robZ

      You’re mistaken–it’s not happening slowly.

  • yuri

    fight for our rights!

  • Sylvia

    Yes this strike is necessary! Good for internet giants like Google & Wikipedia for participating. It’s important to not only petition Congress but show we are willing to act on protecting one of our most valuable media tools. (BTW, don’t bother posting comments following mine. Not interested in arguing with anonymous personages online, only in reading people’s opinions in response to this article). Thnx!

  • TryCommonSense

    I think it’s a great idea. It is outrageous that Congress is even considering giving private companies the authority to unilaterally censor the Internet. Hopefully this blackout will spur enough people to put enough pressure on them not to.

  • Steven

    Id love to see it happen. Ultimately it’s up to those that own the sites laid forth in this blackout, but they have my support. Go you.

  • gloria miller

    I agree with shut down , more should follow .

  • RMStates

    I’m not one to normally post to threads of this nature, but few things frighten me more than people trying to silence free speech. While I agree that something needs to be done about piracy – SOPA is overbroad and clearly infringes upon the right of free speech. I could go in depth as to how it potentially blocks and may even cripple free speech through ambiguous wording, but I won’t. Read the bill and ask yourself these few questions: “What is minimum in this context?” “What is technically feasible?” and other ambiguous terms like expeditiously and reasonably. These are terms that can vary greatly depending upon who is interpreting them. We all know that legal wording is designed for the purpose of ambiguity. However, when the ambiguity results in restraints to free speech, it cannot be allowed.

    As pastor Martin Niemöller eloquently stated in his “first they came …” speech, and by which I will adapt and paraphrase to this cause: if we sit idly by and allow the government to create laws which infringe upon the rights of some, and do nothing as it does not pertain to us, or it benefits only us, we allow the government to establish precedent which will make it easier to infringe upon the rights of larger groups, eventually limiting or eliminating our ability to post things such as this.

    We need to stand in unison to protect our rights by protecting the rights of everyone.

    Voltaire stated “I do not agree with what you say, but I would defend unto death your right to say it.”

    Yes, something needs to be done about piracy. No, SOPA is not the answer. It is overbroad (read up on it – don’t take my word for it), and would serve only as a catalyst for other limiting bills/laws.

    Stepping down from my soap box now …

  • Kathy Schnell

    I support this protest fully.

  • Reenie Starr

    I agree with taking blackout actions to protest SOPA and any other legislation that may arise like it.

  • Anthony

    SOPA has to be stopped. If it passes, most of internet will be shutdown and no more freedom of speech.

  • LaffingKat

    I support Wikipedia and the other sites blacking out. It’s important to raise public awareness about this issue. I also think we should boycott companies that support this legislation and vote out any politician who votes for these bills! I’d rather give my money to independent artists and writers than the MPAA, RIAA, and big publishing houses.

  • M. Tomec

    An actual blackout is exactly what will happen if this bill passes. Since for most people, “seeing is believing”, I think this move is a good one.

  • TheMadMan

    The USA Government has finally figured out how to control, censor and “Big Brother” the internet and our protests will not stop them.
    They (USA Gov) will simply start another massive propaganda drive to get it done and no-one in their right minds believe them any more.
    Remember the “Weapons of Mass Deception” and “I did not have sex with that woman” statements? – nothing will change, including my miss-trust.
    Maybe we should start calling it the “neutered net” as it will effectively have had its balls cut out.

  • tct

    I can’t even begin to say how wrong sopa or any bill like this is. Are we being assimilated by the Borg? Resistance is futile we will be assimilated

  • Vickie Cardellini

    Oh yes I support the protest! There are always going to be congressional reps that support corporation over human citizens.

  • http://reedfamilyjourney.blogspot.com Christy

    I am not sure how much influence the blackout will; have over all but agree with the general consensus that it will at least raise awareness. It’s the eve of the blackout and the first I am ever hearing of SOPA!! I am a SAHM of 4, okldest is only 5 so if it does not involve spit up, diapers, Elmo or Superhero’s I am always out of the loop!

  • Alda Woodward

    I think all that is being done is perfect we need to protect the internet from censorship. Thank you for doing this !!!

  • karla

    I agree on the blackout protest… if we need to loose the ability to communicate VIA certain websites for the greater good so be it… we can’t let SOPA take away our freedom

  • http://None Tyson

    I support the blackout but I hope it doesn’t affect some of the sites I rely on day to day for information and to pay bills online and also facebook, whatifsports.com, gmail.com, socialinfo.com, and btjunkie.org. Other than those web sites I support it in full because we deserve the right to free speech and access to any web site we would like to go to and download any information that we want as long as we don’t exploit the information that we download.

  • http://None Tyson

    I have already contacted my congressman and the house of reps concerning this issue and protesting the censoring of websites, so let it rip!!

  • http://taketheglance.com/airsoft Scott Rathbun

    I am opposed to what our elected officials are trying to do by passing these ridiculous bills to line their pockets with more money . I have just begun my Internet site ,I am new but learning quickly and having fun at it. I do not want see a black out ,but if that i what its going to take to kill these bills lets do it.

  • http://www.smokintime.com John

    I was aware of these 2 bills but not this upcoming blackout so I don’t have enough resources to join or I would. In any event if american people want to really go after the supporters of these two bills then as a whole we should sue the people who support it as well as the industries that are backing it and our congress people. We already have laws on the books for copywrite and infringement….so why should our tax dollars be spent haggling over bills that just duplicate existing laws? I say f?ck Washington and lets take back our country, get them idiots off of capitol hill and get america back to where it should be!!!!!!!! A country of prosper and inovation.

    • spammer exterminator

      You could still do a blackout it may not be as effective but it would still send a message. Truthfully I think there should be a major wave sent out and every single web site that is against those laws be a part of it, everyone should take a weeks vacation and basically shutting down the entire internet for 1 week as a threat to those in support that this is how the internet will be if they pass those laws.

      • spammer exterminator

        When I say everyone I mean; ISP’s, Users, Websites, etc. everyone. It would be difficult even I (just being a user and not having a website or online business) would find it difficult I would especially miss facebook. But if a internet user like me would miss it think how much the supporters will miss the loss of business. That’s what it’s all about they are worried they are loosing to much money on piracy but they left it full of loop holes possibly on purpose so it may not stop at just the piracy sites. I would gladly miss a weeks worth of internet for a life time of internet freedom.

  • spammer exterminator

    I am 100% for the Blackout. But that little message
    “This site has been blocked in protest of the SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect IP Act) two bills which will allow the government to censor the internet. Find out more at americancensorship.org or the video below. This website will return at 8pm.”
    In kinda silly they will be like so I’ve seen websites down for days just for general maintenance. It should read more like; Hello if SOPA or PIPA Pass this his how your internet experience will look – You have reached a site that the government has deemed unsuitable for you o view. You will now be redirected to a more suitable website. And it actually redirects you to a different web page that imagery that looks like its for kids(I dunno maybe something Flowers and Bunnies hopping around) that also says this is possibly how your internet experience shall be if you allow the SOPA and/or PIPA to pass. With the Protest Now Link Here. They could make it easy by creating a single page for everyone to redirect and everyone who is against those laws should join the blackout. Because Seriously it could actually come to that with those laws. I mean if they are successful in filtering out a few Pirate websites whats to stop them from going after other sites, say like sites containing adult content then whats to stop them from going after sites like youtube where will they draw the line? Will it stop at just the internet? Maybe it wasn’t an oversite, maybe the SOPA and PIPA are deliberately phrased in such a way to make it happen. Think about it.

  • http://www.DesiSauda.com Seshu

    We at DesiSauda (www.DesiSauda.com) feel that this act as it stands will not support startups like ours – what if a vendor provides us with a picture and we run a deal with that picture. What if that picture was a copyrighted picture, who is at fault – DesiSauda for not having done its due diligence and running the deal, the vendor who claimed that it was his/her artwork. Would DesiSauda has resources to check and authenticate every single piece of artwork/comment before posting online.

  • Nera

    I’m glad someone is taking action and that they will be making people more aware of this all…

  • Ukee The Monkey

    I sure would love to see Youtube go down for a day for this. I know Google has been fighting against SOPA and I think most people don’t realize the Youtube is going to be one of the first sites to be blocked from this bill, they would after that.

  • http://keeme.com Keeme

    I’m all in…or all out 😉

  • http://www.bookreviewsbyangy.com Angy

    So we are all inconvenienced once again by the US. Wikipedia shuts down, not its American site, but its English language site, in spite of the fact that there are more English speakers outside the States than in them, I am told.

    What a good way to alienate Great Britain, Eire, Australia, New Zealand, much of South Africa, Canada, English-as-first-language speakers in India and Sri Lanka, much of the Caribbean, Gibraltar, most people in the Channel Islands, Fiji,Ghana…and lots more. Look it up on Wikipedia – oh, that`s right, I can`t.

    Keep American protests in America, please.

    • Ukee The Monkey

      We are on brink of loosing our internet and all you can think of is that it is going to bug other people? I guess you would rather not be able to use Wiki ever again rather then offend others?

  • Terri

    SOPA must die! Go for it!

  • spammer exterminator

    I just read the list of participating sites, Not good. I only heard of 5 of those sites and I only use one of them regularly(google). If you really want to send a message you can’t do it without some serious mainstream websites. You need sites like eBay, Amazon, FaceBook, MySpace, Twitter, any website with 100,000+ unique visitors per day to join the black out not just say they support it. No one is going to get the message if they do see what is happening. Look at it this way, some user goes to facebook and see’s a message we support the black and they put a black box over top of their name. the users will hmm, ok… whatever I’m going to go play my games now. That is how most people are going to look at it when they should saying Oh Shit! What do you mean they are censoring my internet and I can’t play my games now. After all they are the majority vote and if they can’t see how it will effect them they wont care. I looked around and 90-99% of the people have a very cavalier attitude about it saying things like so I don’t upload or download pirated software so it’s going to effect me.

  • Kelly Doychinova

    I agree with blackout day. It needs to be done in order to jolt those who have not heard it or do not relize the potential of the bill. I do also agree that major social networds should not entirely be blacked out, but should think of creative ways to demonstrate their support. Such as different background, limited useage,fake popups that state the blog or what not can not be posted than state under that how its only providing a point of demonstration. Kelly

  • http://na swiss

    Has anybody noticed that many of the major supporters of PIPA and SOPA are part of the New World Order….
    pretty scary

  • Mr.D

    You list moveon.org however they are up and running and have no mention of this issue on their site. Perhaps they are waiting another hour? I hope they really are supporting this movement to stop sopa and pipa as it would show it is not a right vs. left issue.

    • Mr.D

      I stand corrected, they have two little story links if you scroll down far enough, and do have a pop up if you open a story.

  • Maria Gonzalez

    There are manny laws now on the internet that protects copyrights. The stuff you do see now on youtube and other places now have to put that the work or video is not theres and even have to go and ask the creators permison to use there works or to post them. So now adays with these laws out there to help these big compinys and the avrige person that makes original films. This law will go and change what others will be able to see and do on the internet if the gov. Was so conserd about piricy they would have tryed the sopa back when piricy was barly starting out and not now after compinese and music mobiles have found and crated and provided ways to prevent and/or catch pirites. So this show that the gov. has something else on there mind then piritesy when it come to passing sopa I can see both points of view and they are both valid points but I am someone that always ask why now and what will happen after. History has shown that poeple are vary power hungry/greedy and in a sosiety like that of this america it is nearly imposible to gane that type of power without the poeples say but right now the poeple are so fokusd on the war and the economy that they are giveing the power to these power hungry men that do to these problems are takeing avanige and are trying to hide thare true intent behind there clams of protecting the poeple I am not antigoverment im just not looking at what they say but I am looking at what theyve done so I suport the blackout becuse now adays everyone uses the internet even politions this blackout will be a eye opener to those who tend to blindly follow or take the gov. at face value. What I did was linked this page to my fb account and gave everyone a heads up to whats going on so they can see for them selves. Oh and I apoligise for the bad spelling I cant spell oh and not being able to spell dosent make you iliterit or stupid I am well educated Iam just unable to spell corectly.

  • Anton B

    This is an iniquitous, poorly-thought-out bill which will curtail the freedom of the internet. It goes directly against world wide web founder, Tim Berners-Lee’s vision for the free and democratic exchange of ideas and is the equivalent of using a sledgehammer to crack a nut; although the US congress has been asked to vote on this Bill it will affect everyone on this planet, from Syria to Nigeria to Australia to Myanmar/ Burma. Please contact your member of Congress to register your protest.

  • Melodie

    This is dumb. Stuff like this like this internet HELP these business. For example, I like Inception the movie. Imagine I had an Inception background for my twitte or tumbler and some one visits my page and sees it… gets interested in Inception… Come on isn’t that heping the industry….

    Stupid people in Congress.

  • Devon Roberts

    I think it is great! It brings awareness to the issue. If all legislature could be done like this, we could see the impact each and everyone would have on individual freedoms, good or bad.
    Just think if google did this the impact it would have!!!

  • tmiles

    I totally support the blackout. We MUST protect the internet! Once they start blocking information, we might as well accept that we live in police state! We MUST have free access to all information and the ability to share information, otherwise, the internet might as well be shut down. Freedom of information, and freedom of speech is what this country was based on, and we CANNOT ALLOW the government or corporations to censor the internet! KEEP THE INTERNET FREE AND OPEN!

  • Mike Seidelman

    SOPA in Greek means “Shut up” and PIPA means (vulgar) “Blowjob”. I think these guys found the right names for their evil laws.
    M. from Greece

  • Pedro Joster

    I support anti piracy legilaion, I am not ashamed. I hope Wikipeda, and Google looseter sirts, becaus people don’t know but oogle is Big Borther, and will sel, gve or whatver all you searches, they compilea profile about you, and know your every move. I don’t want them knowing my business, and telling others, Goodbye Google

  • http://www.bestpaidsurveycompanies.net Best Paid Survey Companies

    I am all for the black out and it will make more and more people aware of the problem and give people an incentive to really research the bill and find out what is in it. There are too many adverse laws being passed.

  • http://robinwajler.com Robin

    I think SOPA is a huge step in the wrong direction. This country was built upon freedom and SOPA is essentially oppression personified.

  • Pat

    maybe if Hollywood made something besides crap, they wouldn’t have to resort to such tactics to push their garbage. Who needs to clue this bunch in to reality? THIS time?

  • http://SOPAetal mary

    ALL major sites–incl Twitter–should be DOWN!

    The problem with the Zombies is they stand in TSA lines being raped and LETTING their Children be raped.

    Letting Monsanto exist, NDAA, Patriot Act, RFID, Vaccines, 800 Concentration Camps in USA, etc, etc, etc

    The Very Least they should do is Black Out their site!

  • Bobdole

    For years the government has been looking at how to regulate the internet. It grew too fast and too quick. Now the world is at our finger tips, and the government has finally figured out at way to trim our nails in the process. The bottom line, “MAKE MONEY!” If anyone else tells you different they don’t know the real reason. For years the government has seen billions of dollars spend and earned with the use of the internet, their dilemma, how do we control this? And how do we, regulate, (the translated word is control)censor,(the real word is control) and stop,(again the real word is control) the free use of the World Wide Web. Idea…lets find a scapegoat, hence anyone who shares anything on the web for free, then we can get our piece of pie. $$$$$ It’s always about the money!

  • Skyy

    im only 11 so idk much about the u.s. congress but WE NEED WINKAPEDIA, YOUTUBE, FACEBOOK, AND DONT EVEN GET ME STARTED WITH HOW MUCH WE ALL LOVE AND NEED GOOGLE <3!!!!! without winkapedia wat would help me with my homework and with out google how could i ask personal questions to help me out with LIFE that no one else can help me with and with out facebook how would people be conected with there loved ones across the world because callin them cost money and plain tickets is way too much cuz not everyones rich and without youtube life would be even worse cuz how would u watch music videos besides on tv on demand and how would people with deaf friends learn how to do sign launge yakl need to think outside the box about ALL the stuff that could happen without these websites :(((

  • http://www.markoting.com markoting

    Hi Josh,
    Cool Post With the increase in the economic growth of the country, a lot of products and services are available to consumers across various social and economic backgrounds. Many people are applying for loans provided by different banks and financial institutions. One of the easiest loans to apply for and receive is a car title loan. Car title loans are much like payday loans in that they are small emergency loans. Applicants should be aware that they have a substantial interest rate and are required to pay the loan back in a month’s time.
    All the Best

  • http://teknisiberat.blogspot.com Ubay

    It has to happen. We need to send the message. If we do nothing… SOPA will return and continue to be a threat. If we take a strong stand now and do a web, “show of force” we will send the message that SOPA will not be tolerated.

  • Alex K

    SOPA + Adolf Hitler + South Park

  • http://www.pousadadegramado.com.br/ Pousada Gramado

    I didn´t hear anything else since then, have there been any decisions? SOPA has to be stopped!