Quantcast

Senator Thinks Smart TVs Might Be Watching You

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:


Senator Thinks Smart TVs Might Be Watching You
[ Technology]

Smart TVs are incredibly easy to hack. In a report from last year, hackers had discovered an easy exploit in Samsung Smart TVs that allowed them to take control of the camera and spy on the owner of said TV. A similar hack has one Congressman very concerned.

Sen. Chuck Schumer wrote a letter to television manufacturers earlier this week detailing his concerns regarding the security of smart TVs. He points to an exploit shown off at Black Hat USA last week in Las Vegas that allowed hackers to remotely take control of the microphone and camera in a smart TV. In response to this revelation, he asks TV manufacturers to work on security in smart TVs.

“You expect to watch TV, but you don’t want the TV watching you,” said Schumer. “Many of these smart televisions are vulnerable to hackers who can spy on you while you’re watching TV in your living room. Our computers have access to firewalls and other security blocks but these televisions do not and that’s why manufacturers should do everything possible to create a standard of security in their internet-connected products.”

Some might scoff at Schumer’s concern since smart TVs aren’t exactly flying off store shelves. That might not be the case for much longer, however, as Gartner predicted in late 2012 that most TVs will be connected to the Internet by 2016. That doesn’t necessarily mean that these TVs will have cameras and microphones, but they can still be accessed remotely by hackers. What if TVs start to store transaction data locally for when viewers buy movies or TV shows? A simple hack could lead to identity theft on a grand scale.

Schumer’s main concern may be hackers spying on consumers, but I would argue that the above scenario is a far more pressing issue. Hackers would really have no interest in seeing what you’re doing in your living room. They’re far more interested in the information that may be stored on the television, and security standards should be updated to prevent that data from being stolen.

Here’s the letter Schumer sent to television manufacturers in full:

Dear Television Manufacturer,

I was disturbed to read recent reports of hackers exploiting new features in television sets in order to break into the home entertainment systems of users and spy on unsuspecting channel surfers. For a TV to secretly function as a spycam would violate a fundamental expectation of privacy in the American home.

As technology has advanced in recent years, we are connected in ways that were previously unimaginable. Televisions now have Wi-Fi, cameras, and other features similar to those of a computer, and are able to complete new and exciting tasks: surfing the internet, making calls, streaming videos and more. These advances can dramatically improve the viewing experience of the American consumers. What has not changed, however, is that Americans expect that when they turn on the television they are in the safety and privacy of their home or office, and not being spied on by hackers.

With these expanding features, televisions must include additional security measures. I would ask that you, as the leading producers of televisions in the United States, work to adopt a uniform set of safety and security standards so that hackers cannot break into our TV’s. It is imperative that we protect people that purchase televisions with these features from being hacked or spied on, and possibly divulging information they do not desire to.

I look forward to hearing from you on this important issue.

Sincerely,

U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer

[h/t: The Hill]

Senator Thinks Smart TVs Might Be Watching You
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • Hmmm…..

    He is very much right. Smart TVs will become cheaper and eventually be flying off the shelves. Cable providers are also making plans to have two way cameras in boxes so that the company can monitor viewer habits. Although, I wouldn’t worry too much about your average hacker or even your average retailer. I would worry more about the government or your police department.

    We are already setting up people online and sending them to prison when their crimes don’t really occur and involve made up people. Really think about that: people are being arrested when there is not a victim, literally nothing happens (most people are arrested after stepping out of their cars), a victim never existed, there couldn’t be the possibility of a crime occurring, and the paid witnesses are the ones doing the entrapping.

    Essentially, we are sending people to prison for what we “think” might happen. Ninety percent of the people entrapped had never committed a crime in their lives. The next step is to allow cameras in homes to “prevent or monitor” violence in homes. People will start getting arrested because of that. We all know it is coming.

    Heck, we all know that Orwell was right. We all know where this leads. We just aren’t doing anything about it. If you don’t know where it leads, I suggest you read the Patriot Acts. I think you will be surprised at what you find.

  • Hmmm…..

    By the way, I am not a conspiracy theorist at all. I am a corporate consultant that has sat through many marketing pitches where the very things I wrote about were being pitched. The scary thing is when you take these technologies and combine them. The plans for facial recognition software are really insidious. I will be glad that I will be dead by the time they come fully online.

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom