Quantcast

Removal Requests Actually Down, Following Google Algorithm Change

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:


[ Search]

On August 10, Google announced that it would be updating its algorithm the following week to include a new ranking signal for the number of “valid copyright removal notices” it receives for a given site.

Do you think Google’s addition of this signal is a good thing for search results? Let us know in the comments.

“Sites with high numbers of removal notices may appear lower in our results,” said Google SVP, Engineering, Amit Singhal, at the time. “This ranking change should help users find legitimate, quality sources of content more easily—whether it’s a song previewed on NPR’s music website, a TV show on Hulu or new music streamed from Spotify.”

One might have expected the removal request floodgates to have been opened upon this news, but that does not appear to be the case. In fact, interestingly, it has been kind of the opposite, according to Google’s Transparency Report.

Barry Schwartz at Search Engine Roundtable points out that from August 13 to August 20, the number of URLs requested to be removed from Google search per week, actually decreased, going from 1,496,220 to 1,427369. It’s only a slight decrease, but the fact that it decreased at all, following this news, is noteworthy.

URLs requested to be removed

When Google first announced the algorithm change, it immediately sparked a great deal of criticism from bloggers and webmasters and concern from consumer groups. “In particular, we worry about the false positives problem,” the EFF said at the time. “For example, we’ve seen the government wrongly target sites that actually have a right to post the allegedly infringing material in question or otherwise legally display content. In short, without details on how Google’s process works, we have no reason to believe they won’t make similar, over-inclusive mistakes, dropping lawful, relevant speech lower in its search results without recourse for the speakers.”

Public Knowledge has spoken out about the change as well. Senior staff attorney John Bergmayer previously said in a statement, “Sites may not know about, or have the ability to easily challenge, notices sent to Google. And Google has set up a system that may be abused by bad faith actors who want to suppress their rivals and competitors. Sites that host a lot of content, or are very popular, may receive a disproportionate number of notices (which are mere accusations of infringement) without being disproportionately infringing. And user-generated content sites could be harmed by this change, even though the DMCA was structured to protect them.”

“Google needs to make sure this change does not harm Internet users or the Internet ecosystem,” he added.

Interestingly enough, Public Knowledge actually receives contributions from Google, as indicated in new court document Google provided in the Oracle case. “Google has contributed to Public Knowledge for years before the complaint in the case at bar was filed,” wrote Google attorney Robert Van Nest.

Regarding inaccurate and intentionally abusive copyright removal requests, Google says, “From time to time, we may receive inaccurate or unjustified copyright removal requests for search results that clearly do not link to infringing content. An independent, third-party analysis of how frequently improper and abusive removal requests are submitted was conducted in 2006.”

That was six years ago, and does little to set webmasters’ minds at ease. On an FAQ page, Google lists a number of examples of requests that were submitted that were “clearly invalid,” and notes that it did not comply with any of them.

In case you’re wondering how many of the requests Google does comply with, the company says on the same page, “We removed 97% of search results specified in requests that we received between July and December 2011.”

“We remove search results that link to infringing content in Search when it is brought to our attention, and we do it quickly,” Google adds. “As of May 2012, our average processing time across all removal requests submitted via our web form for Search is approximately 10 hours. However, many different factors can influence the processing time for a particular removal request, including the method of delivery, language, and completeness of the information submitted.”

As far as webmasters being informed of the issue by Google, the company says, “When feasible and legal to do so, we try our best to notify users to give them an opportunity to submit a counter-notice in response to copyright removal requests. For Search, it is extremely difficult to provide meaningful notice to webmasters whose pages have been identified in copyright removal requests, because we do not necessarily know their identities or have an effective means of contacting them. If users have registered with our Webmaster Tools as web site owners, we will notify them there. We also share a copy of qualifying copyright removal requests with the public site Chilling Effects, where a webmaster may inspect it as well.”

For the past month, Google says 5,680,830 URLs have been requested to be removed from 31,677 domains by 1,833 and 1,372 reporting organizations. The top copyright owners in the past month have been Froytal Services, RIAA member companies, Microsoft, NBCUniversal and BPI. The top specified domains have been filestube.com, torrenthound.com, isohunt.com, downloads.nl and filesonicsearch.com.

You can see all copyright removal requests here. You can see a big list of 133,502 specified domains here. A list of 9,660 reporting organizations is available here. The list of over ten thousand copyright owners is here.

All data reflects copyright removal notices received for search since 2011, with some omissions, which include requests for products other than Google Search (like YouTube and Blogger), and requests submitted by means other than Google’s web form (such as fax or written letters).

It’s important to note that while Google is now using the number of removal requests a site receives as a ranking factor, it is still only one of over two hundred factors. But the negative SEO ramifications of the signal still have people worried. Negative SEO was a growing concern before this signal was even announced, particularly as it’s related to bad links and the Penguin update. Now there is concern that competitors can submit notices, and influence Google. Whether this can be done successfully or not really remains to be seen. Google seems to be giving the impression that it cannot, as Google only complies with “valid” requests, but when was the last time Google executed an algorithm update flawlessly?

Google even recently reworded its help page for the question “Can competitors harm ranking?”. It used to say, “There’s almost nothing a competitor can do to harm your ranking or have your site removed from our index.” It was changed to say, “Google works hard to prevent other webmasters from being able to harm your ranking or have your site removed from our index.”

But, as the image above shows, it doesn’t appear that Google’s announcement has led to too a substantial increase in attempted abuse so far. That doesn’t mean it’s not possible to abuse it, and that people aren’t trying to abuse it. People were probably already trying to abuse it. While the number may be down since the announcement, the greater trend is clearly that of substantial growth in the number of requests. It will be surprising if the trend does not ultimately continue upward. We’re still waiting on the latest numbers to come out.

Are you worried about URL removal requests as a ranking signal? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Removal Requests Actually Down, Following Google Algorithm Change
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • http://interbolica.com Anabolics Steroids

    Google have lots take down to do.

  • http://www.keralatour-packages.org/ Kerala Tour Packages

    My New website kerala tour packages, is suddenly loose ranking from Google.com.. its 1 month old website… need help

    • http://cass-hacks.com Craig

      You should check out the Google Webmaster Forum. There are a lot of great contributors there that can likely help!

      Good luck!

  • http://www.internetmarketingmantra.com/ vicky khobragade

    How we can manage the keyword ranking, if google regularly updates its algorithms.

    • http://cass-hacks.com Craig

      Simple, worry more about content than algorithm.

      Chasing algorithms that no one outside of Google can understand is like chasing a straw of grass in a tornado.

      • http://www.qualitylogoproducts.com Jill

        Well said, Craig! You probably won’t have too much to worry about if you produce meaningful and keyword rich (not stuffed) content on a regular basis; basing offerings on algorithms, on the other hand, is nothing but trouble.

  • http://www.rage-india.com Lakshmi

    These 86 odd Google updates is to fecilitate original content. As far as you are sticking to this there is no harm to your website.

  • http://cass-hacks.com Craig

    “Probably not what you expected”

    Having an ever watchful eye out for a possible spontaneous eruption of a Spanish Inquisition, I ALWAYS expect the unexpected! :-()

    The drop is more than likely just a local valley that will see a subsequent rise, and fall, and rise, and fall ad-infinitum.

  • http://webgeek.elletis.com suresh

    well see what google do more about it . . . !!

  • Robert Blueford

    I’m tired of reading thet G is doing its best all the time and shutting the door to real responsability. Trying isn’t nearly enough to get the job done, nor convince victims of their inaction in all things relating to AdWords Billions.

  • http://umstrategies.com Peter Sundstrom

    Abuse of Google guidelines whether it be negative SEO or false copyright infringement notices is always going to be an issue. The aim should always be to minimise the amount of abuse.

  • http://evrn.net/ Howard Crane

    Who REALLY uses these websites? These are just the chosen websites of the current criminal syndicate ruling the world. When something’s digital, even the agents and affiliates commit Copyright theft.

    A “song previewed on NPR”?…. if you’re American yes… I didn’t even know what NPR was until I googled it just now.
    A TV Show or Movie on Hulu? Who the f*ck uses Hulu? What a waste of money. You could just go to movie2k, 1channel.
    And who in hell uses Spotify? I haven’t ever heard of this in my life!!! Youtube fulfills all my needs, and if I want it in mp3 format on my hard drive I just search for sites that will convert the videos for me.

    With every step they take to make the Internet better, they’re in fact making it a fucktonne worse.

    “The road to Hell is paved with good intentions”

  • http://www.strategicrevenue.com John Colascione

    I wonder if they will YouTube in search results due to all the DMCA complaints targeted at it.

  • alex

    I would say to the founders of google if they keep making changes to their search: don’t push your luck :) as searchers will get tired of the nonsense and inconvenience changes will move on to other search engines, lets say mmmm bing.com for example? that is what lots of friends and members of my family are doing now

  • http://lifeinsurancecriticalillnessnow.co.uk Jack of All trades

    In my humble opinion,I do agree that the originality of the content is the key for better SERP instead of chasing the algorithms and try to be cleverer than G.My experience showed that fresh texts are indexed quick ans easy by G.

  • http://www.easysunglasses.nl Bennie van Bakel

    Amazing odd Google update,as many others. Thanks anyway for this contribution, enjoyed it.

  • Michael Kealy

    Perhaps take-down requests were lower because it’s summertime and so many people are on vacation. There was also that pesky thing called the Olympics that sucked up so much of the world’s attention. It’ll be interesting to see if the trend continues into September.

  • Sandi

    I quit using Google when they put an inbox tab on their search!

  • Hisnibbs

    I have tracked changes all this week and have noticed a few things;
    Getting different results depending on ipad/macbook/desktop pc
    Different results on chrome/opera/firefox
    Different results at different times of day – but this could be updates happening by google.
    Multiple repeated listings when getting 100 results

    Our site went onto front page off back to 2nd page and then rose further up and seemed to settle in about 11th position.

    We were initially please but now, despite being THE most relevant result for the search term and over 260 pages indexed by Google we are now not appearing in the top 100 results.

    We’re not sure what has happened but it seems with every update Google cements big business at the top of the Serps and ignores websites with relevant, real world content run by us smaller guys.

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom