Quantcast

Local Police Are Tracking Your Cell Phone Location

Over 5,500 pages of public records indicate the practice is widespread, often lacks oversight.

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:
Local Police Are Tracking Your Cell Phone Location
[ Business]

The Supreme Court decision United States v. Jones recently ruled unconstitutional the warrantless tracking of crime suspects via GPS tracking devices. Though the decision marks a clear victory for personal privacy and Fourth Amendment freedom from warrantless searches, it is limited in scope to blocking warrantless use of GPS devices, leaving other forms of digital tracking in a legal grey area. There’s still no single precedent nor piece of legislation — except, of course, for the Fourth Amendment — barring law enforcement agencies from tracking your location warrantlessly through other electronic means, like your cell phone. A recent public records request by the American Civil Liberies Union revealed that this practice of warrantless tracking, often done with a minimum of oversight or accountability, is more common than you may think — and is even frequently utilized by local law enforcement agencies acting in non-emergency situations.

In August of last year, the ACLU filed over 380 public records requests asking state and local law enforcement agencies from across the country to provide information about their cell phone tracking policies, practices, and procedures. The requests yielded over 5,500 pages of internal records. Of the more than 200 police departments that responded to the requests, nearly all reported tracking cell phones in some capacity, though very few departments reported being bound by policy to obtain a warrant first. “While cell tracking by local police departments has received some limited public attention in the last few years,” reports the New York Times, “the A.C.L.U. documents show that the practice is in much wider use — with far looser safeguards — than officials have previously acknowledged.”

“Most law enforcement agencies explained that they track cell phones to investigate crimes,” writes the ACLU on its blog. “Some said they tracked cell phones only in emergencies, for example to locate a missing person. Only 10 said they have never tracked cell phones.”

Of those using cell phone tracking technology, police departments vary widely in their practices and the type of data they obtain. Most law enforcement agencies submit requests for records directly to major cell phone service providers, who can make good money on the exchange. The cost of cell phone location records ranges from a few hundred dollars to track a phone’s location, up to over $2,200 for a wiretap, The Times reports. Some agencies have policies in place restricting the use of warrantless cell phone tracking to emergency situations, while others have identified in non-emergency situations all users of a particular cell tower, and others still have learned how to download callers’ text records even when the phone is turned off. There are even small town law enforcement agencies, like the police in Gilbert, Arizona, who have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars on their own cell surveillance equipment, so that they can bypass the time, cost, and potential red tape of requesting help from cell phone service providers.

There are police departments that do protect public privacy by requiring a subpoena or warrant when tracking cell phone locations, though they’re in the minority. Police departments committed to this practice include the Wichita, Kansas; Lexington, Kentucky; and the County of Hawaii. Groups like the ACLU cite these departments as examples that law enforcement agencies can adequately fulfill their duty to serve and protect the public without unduly overstepping the boundaries of privacy.

Other agencies claim that questions of legality are trumped by the pragmatic benefits of the technology. Police in Grand Rapids, Michigan, were able to save the life of a stabbing victim whom they found via a cell phone locator, according to the New York Times. “We find people,” criminal analysts Roxann Ryan told The Times, “and it saves lives.”

Last I checked, though, the PD on the sides of police cruisers typically stands for Police Department rather than Pragmatism Determiners. As moving as such individual stories can be, it is law enforcement’s job to uphold the law and protect citizens in accordance with and deference to United States law, and particularly the Constitution, rather than to make ad hoc decisions about legality and practicality. Behind all the stories of life-saving constitutional breaches lie untold numbers of occasions where a citizen’s privacy has been violated without any benefit to that citizen or anyone else, or — worse — where the result of the breach may even have led to physical harm, arrest without due process, or public shame. It’s a slippery slope to let law enforcement agencies track private citizens indiscriminately. No matter the potential benefits, the potential for misuse of the practice poses a threat to individual liberty and the democratic process. As this ruling in a Washington, D.C. federal appeals court explained:

  • A person who knows all of another’s travels can deduce whether he is a weekly church goer, a heavy drinker, a regular at the gym, an unfaithful husband, an outpatient receiving medical treatment, an associate of particular individuals or political groups — and not just one such fact about a person, but all such facts.

A recent circuit court ruling in Maryland determined that cell phone location data is not protected under the Fourth Amendment, while judges presiding over cases in Philadelphia and Texas could rule otherwise. In Congress, bipartisan legislation called the Geolocation Privacy and Surveillance (GPS) Act is sponsored by Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), and in the House by Representatives Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Peter Welch (D-Vt.). The bills would require law enforcement agencies to obtain a warrant before tracking any geolocation information.

[ACLU, New York Times, Photo Source: EasyCellPhoneTracking]

Local Police Are Tracking Your Cell Phone Location
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • http://MIA-mobi.com MIAmobi

    People can take control of their own privacy when it comes to SmartPhone tracking. MIAmobi SilentPocket addresses this issue and many more problems associated with mobile devices. With over 500,000 mobile app developed for smartphones, many of which are stealth and are ease dropping on your every move. Some are capable of turning on functions on your phone like your mic, camera, GPS, address book and more, even when it has been turned off. There is only one sure way to stop this if you really want to know for sure that you have control of your mobile device is to block all wifi coming in or going out. Get informed at MIA-mobi

  • Johnathan Hattaway

    This is a complete abuse of privacy act of 1974. I am a regular citizen trying hard every day to live up to my potential, I was arrested with a suspicion of DUI 2 years ago, which was cometely dropped besides that the worst thing I have on my record is a few minor speeding tickets, I am 99 % sure these guys think I am on meth Bc I take adderral every day for severe ADHD ,, didn’t these police parents teach them that you should never ever act on assumption without 100 percent proof. I am a college educated graduate with a 142 iq. The only thing these cops are doing if they are hacking my phones is hurting my ability to add to the local economy. Ex, 2 years ago a cop pulled me over claiming he ran my tag and it showed no insurance, clearly I had insurance in my glove box and it was indeed active. Guess what I did for work,, hmmm sold insurance,, now here is the kicker, I had left work due to a severe allergic reaction to aspirin,, I drove up the canyon barely able to breathe looking like the devil due to the swelling from the reaction. When he pulled me over he did not ask if I was ago but grabbed me by the collar , I was wearing a suit and threw me in the back of the car, I asked him for a benedryl and he told me to shut up, now here’s the worst part, when I got to the station he took me straight in for mugshots, I literally looked like the devil do my allergic reaction and they just laughed, next they took three public mugshots in the middle of my allergic reaction, looking like the son of satan due to the hives and swelling, I complied and after I got out I asked what this was all about,, you have a ticket that is 2 days passed due,, “oh you mean the ticket I payed last week officer?? After looking into it they never updated it in their system, now not only did I miss a whole afternoon of work, but their was a publicly accessible picture of me looking like the son of Satan, now when I apply for high paying positions and they run a background check it is the first thing that pulls up to my bosses, park city police have a reputation or unethical treatment towards citizens,, but this is out of control. Cops need to be held accountable for these types of things and be punished harder as they are supposed to be role model citizens. I am completely discussed with the lack of dignity and respect they show to my local community..