Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Google Panda Update: Lack of Consistency on Quality?

HubPages: Some of Our Best Content Dropped, Some Went Up

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 40 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. I think its about time the big dogs of search did something bout these adwords and add plastered sites. Makes for a horible user experience. Hats off to google! T

  2. vybixa

    So its not only Mr. Crum fanning the eHow “hate press”, even (understandably) their competitors. Could it be that eHow / Demad Media actually have slightly better quality content than the Hubpages? I could faultthe Big G on the algorithm, but we all know that these results are NOT set in stone for any considerable period.

    At the start of last week, my sites were COMPLETELY out of the first page and appearing mid to end page 2 (from a pre Panda first page top 5). Now (though admittedly I have no syndicated content et al), I rank TOP for each of my long-tails in multiple google domains, albeit I do not appear AT ALL in some others, again from a good pre-Panda position. So, the results will change over time, and the good content (as percieved by google) will,like cream, rise to the top.

    • I don’t subscribe to this “eHow hate press” concept. I do not hate eHow. I have said repeatedly that the site does have some quality content, and I have also acknowledged that Demand Media has taken and continues to take steps to improve quality. I have simply tried to cover the search quality aspect of the topic. I have no problem with eHow ranking for certain queries if the quality and authority is there. The same goes for HubPages or any other site, whether it’s the New York Times or EzineArticles. It’s about users seeing the best results for their searches.

      Demand Media and eHow are brought up so often because they dominate the market, and the user complaints. It’s similar to why we refer to Google so often when we talk about search or search marketing – Google is the clear market leader – therefore it gets more attention, heavier scrutiny, etc. I don’t hate Google or Demand Media.

      • vybixa

        The eHow “hate press” comment was to point out how often you have quoted them in virtually your posts on the subject. unfortunately, repeatedly pointing out that Demand / eHow have some quality content does not offer you any redress here. On the google side, I have NOT known you to write negativey about it, but then again, I have not read all your articles.

        The main point I wanted to introduce to the discussion was the fact that it is too early to slaughter the Panda results (and I elaborated with my own experience). Hopefully we’ll hear a lot more of this from WPN (and yourself) in the near future, as I believe, this is how it is going to pan out.

        On a side note, would you know whether google purges their entire index when they issue an update? (or when rolling out their update) It certainly seems so.

        • It’s fair that I do mention eHow a lot, but for the reasons stated above. I’ve written plenty of things both positive and negative about Google. I simply try to call things as I see them.

          As far as it being too early to “slaughter the Panda”, you may be right about that. Google will continue to tweak its algorithm as it always does, and even some who were initially hit by the Panda reported a return to rankings.

          As I stated at the beginning of the article, “Our thinking is that the more sides of the story we hear, the more webmasters and content producers will be able to learn from it.”

          As far as the index purging thing, I can’t answer that with any degree of certainty.

  3. Adsense Publisher

    Really? No idea why your rankings are all over the place for articles? Wow, somebody really needs to take a class in SEO. They’re called backlinks you moron! Two articles that have similar keyword or key phrase density where one has more backlinks to it will prevail for the most part. There are other signals, but none more important than the words you use, how you use them and then of course people linking to your page using specific words. It’s why anybody can game the system still. The thing is Google will catch on if you don’t do it slowly over time, like they did with JCPenny and Overstock.com.

    • vybixa

      Your language does give away the depth of your thinking. That said, you can assume for the purposes of this interaction that I have a good grasp of SEO, on and off page. Nevertheless, having done neither on my part (leave alone the organic SEO that happens anyway), I noticed the swings I mentioned in my previous post (just to re-enforce the pre and post panda rankings).

      Well now that you are much the wiser, could you go and wash your mouth out? (hands too if that makes you feel better)

      • Adsense Publisher

        If I was replying to your post I would have replied to it. I was posting in regards to the author’s original post, to the author.

  4. alimac

    Google’s search quality seems to have degenerated over the last couple of years. Whether they have lost business/functional focus or their algorithm has turned into an unmanageable monster I can’t say but my impression is that every time the “fix” something they break many other things.

    These days most Google searches (and Places) return spam and sites with little or no merit (as defined by publicly stated SEO criteria). Has Google got so complex it’s easier to con ?

    I have started using BING ,,, something I never imagined I’d be doing a year ago !

  5. The new Google Algorithm bumped my website second page listing for Andover Pest Control when it previously had first place placement for this search term.

  6. voltara

    Hubpages content is garbage, just like most of the sites mentioned above. Be honest, they are just link farms. Stop pretending they are anything else. The “articles” are next to worthless generalities which wouldn’t exist if they didn;t contain links. These are the sort of websites we all hate, unless we are using them for SEO.

    The main reason google results may have declined in quality in recent years is due to people gaming the system. and results from garbage sites like those mentioned above ranking through seo manipulations.

  7. Another example how Google changes effect general population.
    A small number of good sites (non content farms) has lost high SERP positions – thank you Google!

  8. Okay…….For some of the new guys……Here is some info from an older SEO man :)

    Look up Pagerank carving…that is what is going on here.

    Reverse Pagerank carving……

    See what Ehow, HAS is “back links” or “references” on every article..

    Next they no follow those references and then link to other sections of there site with TONS of link juice.

    Its one of the “data points” that everyone is missing here….

    THINK……does each one of YOUR website pages have two links to a credible source and are they no followed giving your pages juice?

    no,…….then you better get on it…yep, no follow the reference which will boost your inner page links……

    PR Carving WAS hot in 2007 and its BACK!

    Feed the that Panda some BAMBOO! ITs hungry!

    Long Live Pagerank carving!

    PS: Most of you will just ignore me and think I am nuts, The smart ones will play and get ahead :)

    It could be worse…….Pandas are generally friendly :)

  9. The experts I talk with (and sometimes hire) to train my guys on on-page and off-page optimization advocate using pretty much the same formula and link building strategies. Where I get most of my link juice PR4+ is by booting up Market Samurai, running pagerank and anchor text analysis and doing the heavy lifting that any good linking strategy would cover. All this chatter about link farms and bot this and bot that is a big ole waste of time. I listen to what Matt Cutt says and follow the leader.

  10. The main reason google results may have declined in quality in recent years is due to people gaming

  11. thanks for useful article(Have you gained additional insight into the Panda Update as time has progressed?)

  12. Google seems to be constantly changing their algorithms with both negative and positive effect. One day we’re on page one and the next page two or three.

    Quality content is extremely important however it seems that if you are trying to promote (duplicate) your original content on other sites you are now penalised.

    It would be nice to know how you can promote your site to attract visitors without being penalised for passing your original content onto others. Anybody know the answer?

  13. See what Ehow, HAS is “back links” or “references” on every article..

    Next they no follow those references and then link to other sections of there site with TONS of link juice.

    Its one of the “data points” that everyone is missing here….

    • Interesting. I was checking my backlinks the other day and found that a certain property listing site that I use had done the same. First they linked to my original content and then went no follow. Now I know where all the juice went!

  14. its horrible, Any ideas when the Panda update hits the Australia? but my hosting in US

  15. I sure anytime my lucky

  16. Pingback: Block Domains in Google Search Results | WebProNews

  17. Im looking forward to see the update in europe, and how it will attack non english sites :)

  18. Pingback: Farmer aka Panda Algorithm Update | Techieshelp.com |IT Problems

  19. Pingback: Google Panda Update Still Encouraging Higher Quality | WebProNews

  20. Pingback: Google Panda Update Still Encouraging Higher Quality | Popular Events

  21. I think it´s fair! Any ideas when the Panda update hits the German?

  22. Pingback: Google Panda Update Winners, Losers, and Future Considerations | WebProNews

  23. If your business was hurt by Google’s panda update, maybe you need to rethink your business model.

  24. Pingback: Google Panda Algorithm Update (And Related Stories)- A Roundup | WebProNews

  25. Pingback: Google Panda Algorithm Update (And Related Stories)- A Roundup | Thomas Paylor

  26. Pingback: Google Panda Update Winners, Losers, and Future Considerations | Thomas Paylor

  27. Pingback: 30% of All YouTube Videos Make Up 99% of Views | WebProNews

  28. Pingback: 30% of All YouTube Videos Make Up 99% of Views | Thomas Paylor

  29. Pingback: 30% of All YouTube Videos Make Up 99% of Views | Popular Events

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>