Breaking: “Google Instant” Introduced

Update: The event has started. Marissa Mayer says, "In the past few months, Google has crossed one billion users each week." Caffeine makes index 50% faster, she says.

She talks about Caffeine, real-time search, spelling corrections, enhancements to questions and answers, Google Squared (part of core web search now), stars in search, and the recent redesign. These are all presumably used in Google Instant.

Here’s a URL for Google Instant:

http://www.google.com/instant

The official description from that site:

Google Instant is a new search enhancement that shows results as you type. We are pushing the limits of our technology and infrastructure to help you get better search results, faster. Our key technical insight was that people type slowly, but read quickly, typically taking 300 milliseconds between keystrokes, but only 30 milliseconds (a tenth of the time!) to glance at another part of the page. This means that you can scan a results page while you type.

The most obvious change is that you get to the right content much faster than before because you don’t have to finish typing your full search term, or even press “search.” Another shift is that seeing results as you type helps you formulate a better search term by providing instant feedback. You can now adapt your search on the fly until the results match exactly what you want. In time, we may wonder how search ever worked in any other way.

Google says Google Instant can Save 2-5 seconds per search. The company says the benefits are faster searches, smarter predictions, and instant results.

The feature can be turned off by clicking the link next to the search box on any SERP.

It’s starting out only in the US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Russia. It is compatible with Chrome v5/6, Firefox v3, Safari v5 for Mac and Internet Explorer v8.

Mayer finally announced the feature. The official blog post for it is up now too.

It has a scroll to search feature that lets you scroll through predictions and see results instantly for each as you scroll down.

Mayer says its not "search as you type". It’s actually "search before you type" because it’s predicting results. "There’s even a psychic element to it," she says. She recalls an old Google April Fools day joke about a similar product.

Google Instant will be rolling out over the course of today in the U.S. Over the next week, the other countries mentioned will start getting it (for users signed in).

The Google Instant team says its great for weather, because you can just press "w" to get local weather results.

Steve Rubel says Google Instant kills SEO. I don’t know about that. What do you think? Comment here.

Update: I’ve written more on this subject here (including some thoughts from Google’s Matt Cutts).

Google says they’re "working hard to get this experience to you on mobile" this fall.

Google Instant applies to ads and changes the way Google counts impressions. Google talks about this more here.

"It’s possible that this feature may increase or decrease your overall impression levels," says Google’s Dan Friedman. "However, Google Instant may ultimately improve the quality of your clicks since it helps users type queries that more directly connect them with the answers they need."

Trevor Claiborne of the Google Analytics Team says that Analytics users might notice some fluctuations in AdWords impression volume and traffic for organic keywords. "For example, you may find that certain keywords receive significantly more or fewer impressions moving forward," he says.

There is also a post on Google’s Webmaster Central blog, which webmasters should read. Impressions are measured in three ways, it says: the traditional way, when a user clicks on a link that appears as they begin to type, and when a user stops typing, and the results are displayed for a minimum of 3 seconds.

During the presentation, Google says Google Instant will "enrich your life" and help you learn more while you search. They say it will seem so obvious in retrospect.

I must have missed this in the announcement, but Google will reportedly hide explicit search results in instant results.

Google is working on implementing the feature in browser search boxes (possibly in the next few months).

Google says,"We care a lot about child safety." They employ the same policies and filter for violence, hate, and porn. They won’t show the results as you go along until you press enter.

The amount of personal info Google collects for Google Instant is unchanged, according to Mayer.

As far as cost of data centers, Google says its in line with regular growth.

On SEO, Google says ranking stays the same. There’s not a big change as far as people trying to adapt their results for the search engine. The way people search will change.

Mayer says the goal is to roll out the feature in as many different platforms and geographies as possible. Mayer likens Google Instant to power steering.

As far as behavior change, Google says as you use Google Instant more, you begin to explore the area of your interest more. You might do multiple queries as a result.

Mayer says there were some Google users who decided to turn off Google Instant (usually for connection speed reasons – very small percentage).

It’s not directly tied to Caffeine, but it makes indexing fresher, so it is related. The index is bigger, so it increases the competition of the results.

One audience member points out that single letter queries often bring up big brand results.

AndroidGuys points to a way you can use Google Instant on mobile already (as opposed to waiting a few months). Hat tip to Michael Martin for that.

Original Article: Google’s event is about to happen, but the company has already uploaded the following videos of the product: Google Instant. The videos confirm speculation about the announcements being based on "streaming search results".

Watch below.

The announcement itself is coming up at 12:30 Eastern here. There may be more to it.

Here’s another video Google has uploaded about the testers:

And yet another video Google has uploaded:

There are 11 Comments. Add Yours.

.nate
September 8, 2010 at 1:18 pm

Now users will only be clicking listings 1-3 of several pages flying by instead of 1-10 on 1-2 pages?

Making something idiot-proof always produces better idiots. This is great for “wow” factor, but I’m not so sure about usability. There’s a LOT of variables in play here. Plus, what does this mean for the Imp/Conv. score on my PPC campaigns?
- .nate
  September 8, 2010 at 1:24 pm
  
  Ah… I see they posted the response to PPC in an update while I was commenting. I think this move is going to strike fear into every AdWords buyer and SEO everywhere. If your ad isn’t 1-3 or your organic position 1-3 with no Local Listings, Base Feeds, etc etc…. I think your Google traffic just got a lot more expensive.
Guest
September 8, 2010 at 3:33 pm

I’m so sick of Google. Google like Ebay thinks they can piss off website owner and not suffer the consequences. Keep at it Google. We are human too….we are searches too… Ah, and have a big mouth too!!! where is my handky…

Adwords users must be really pissed…
F-google
September 8, 2010 at 4:22 pm

Great. As far as SEO, Now anyone that isn’t ranked in the top 6 for your keyword or anyone not targeting single word keywords is screwed.
????? ??????, ?????? ??????
September 9, 2010 at 3:51 am

The usage of a utility depends on the user, that is why a program can fit to many users, you use a word prossesing software to suite your needs and you are not bound to templates, what google does is to “template” the search, now, imagine that you have a word prossesing software that works only with templates, you will never get the document you want to write.

What google does is giving you whatever combination of words they have “in-stock” and it does not let you express yourself with YOUR query, also it compels you to use those in-stock words instead of YOUR history search, let’s say that for some security or personal reason you do not want to keep a website link on your computer and because you do not type the link (to prevent the link to be stored in the computer history log) you always use the same frase on the search prompt, now you have to deal with a “cookie” to turn YOUR history on and when you clean cookies (you should from time to time) then again you get their in-stock catalog and you need to manipulate THEIR program again till you get angry and decide to use it or to switch to Bing.

Well, I switched to Bing.
Guest
September 9, 2010 at 11:55 am

I hate Google Instant. It says you can turn it off but you can’t. When you select the option to turn it off it is still on. I like to type the whole thing and not see a bunch of junk I don’t want. If people can’t type take a typing class. How slow can they be.
- ????? ??????, ?????? ?????
  September 10, 2010 at 4:42 am
  
  You can turn it off, but only if you have your browser’s “cookies enabled”, the problem is that for security reasons I clean cookies almost everyday thus makes “turning it off” unusable.
Dr. Michael Haley
September 9, 2010 at 12:15 pm

I noticed that we also have the ability to turn it off, next to the search bar, if we don’t like it. One thing is for sure – from an SEO perspective, this changes the way we have to think when we target keywords in the articles we write. I see the results from short words preceeding the long tail phrases. I want to grab the persons attention first with the short words… I love it!
Michael G. Hurston
September 9, 2010 at 3:58 pm

So I took a look using the search terms that typically generate traffic to our site and the results seemed to be consistent with that we get from the regular search. That said, we’re in the top three for these terms and a fairly large site in the sense of who we are and what we do (www.sanjose.org)

I then tried some of my personal sites, much smaller, niche sites. One seemed to do really well, filling the whole page with results from my site or our facebook and twitter pages. The other two, they didn’t appear at all.

My conclusion…I don’t know. Sites that are SEO’d well will do well, sites that aren’t won’t – not any change here…

Has anyone tried a site that has a lot of traffic and ranks within the top 3 on Google’s normal search NOT show up in the Google Instant search?
Guest
September 9, 2010 at 5:28 pm

The most serious problem is that now users will be influenced in their choice of keywords based on the suggestions and this can seriously affect the research. If we think globally, this can be very dangerous
- ????? ??????, ?????? ?????
  September 10, 2010 at 4:37 am
  
  It is like a friend telling you what to think rather then letting you think it by yourself or as “putting words in your mouth” instead of letting self expression