Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Facebook Seems Worried About Google+. Should it Be?

Why Google+ has a fighting chance of social media success

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 61 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Facebook vs. Google: i think Google will take the lead once again because Google is always reinventing itself. But more than that if Facebook and Skype merge together then in my opinion Facebook will ultimately be the one everyone will send most of their time. Things are and will always be developing within cyberspace… So the real question is: who is innovative enough to captivate the users who frequent most? I say running apps within a site is the future of social networking… Like Skype inside of Facebook…. They are on the right path…

    • Ahmed

      You couldn’t be more wrong I actually despise the fact that the new skype has fb integrated besides most skype users are the older generations that just wanna make free or cheap calls they couldn’t care less about social networking.

  2. I am an avid Facebook user (id=1006567915) and have begun using Google+ (Michael Haltman) and cannot yet see what the buzz is surrounding the Google+ platform.

    I am withholding final judgement but at this point in time would say that Facebook has nothing to worry about!

  3. Herb

    Have signed in for ooogle+ and look forward to the road ahead, it would appear that Facebook now remove every video upload thats made,
    they call it copyright, yet there is loads of copys of the same video on utube. if you put a link to utube the video is allowed,, Im afraid its goodby Facebook, and hello Google+… Facebok is loseing its way..
    and im finding another way….

  4. Yet another social media site that has to be catered to. Hopefully the public will get overloaded with this nonsense and find something better to do.

  5. Lowe

    facebook its self is boring who the hell have nothing to do all day beside some rich asshole on the other end controlling you idiots lives google in another hand is a monopoly freak who dont care about blacks or poor people just more billions well you cant take the money to hell with you when you die its all vanity.. for example youtube owned by google on the homepage you never see them promote black people shit just a bunch of geeky white people spamming that shit indirectly so in my opinion google can never over come the power of facebook because google is just for white people and facebook is for the world.. but google will definitely try to use their search power to win but they will still fail and google plus will just be another facebook imitation that nobody gives a fuck about…

    • Frank

      Golly Gee Again Little fella, it is clear you have never been to facebook, where are all these rich people you talk about?

  6. It’s more like being led to slaughter. It’s a forced changed in many ways, and how many people like that vs. change by choice. I can see some linkedin type benefits but working with a diverse group of businesses of all shapes, sizes and industries Google +1 is just another layer of Google-style serp manipulation that we have to figure out how to leverage or overcome.

  7. Lowe

    google a racist white company all about white people never do shit for nobody never do shit for the world all about them selves never do shit to help hurting people greedy wicked google is the mark of the beast 666 just two fucking rich stuck up ass white guys full of greed and destined for hell…

    • Frank

      Golly Gee little fella, I agree with some of this, but the bs about greedy white people is racist in it’s self. Like their is no greedy people of other colors, they just don’t get reported on because the media is scared to be called racist.

    • Google is racist? get a f*****g life you moron only racist prick here is you!

  8. Lowe

    And o Yeah google probably will banned me for this shit but who gives a fuck they never tried to help do shit in the first place so fuck em

  9. Danea Krist

    I really dont think that facebook has much to worry about. The sites are much different! Facebooks fan/business pages are much more appealing. Google sites seems to be bloggish. The apps on facebook are amazing for small businesses. Many people are on facebook for the games…google has none. Facebook ads are very cheap since there is much less competition compared to google search engines. The sites are just very different and appeal to different kinds of people. Google is much cleaner and less hectic than facebook. I like them both for different reasons.

  10. Tony

    Yes, they should. Facebook is like Hotmail used to be on the ancient times of the web; strong enough to change our habits, but useless to build a business around it. So, sooner or later MSN will buy it at a discount. I guess that after going public and the financial people realize how difficult is to make money with a gossip oriented social network, price will star falling and another bubble will sweep away people’s savings.

    Google is a successful business indeed. They are developing their own technology more business oriented. That’s smarter. My only doubt is if they will buy Twitter or not, cause it is far way more useful than Facebook, and the only chance for Facebook to survive is buying Twitter before Yahoo, Microsoft, or Google. I know… technology is neat… but business s**ks, and all revolve around money.

  11. If Google has it sites set on Facebook it will most certainly have an impact on Facebook. To what degree we do not know. Personally I do not care. In this fast changing world we have to learn to adapt.

  12. I really don’t see the similarities, is G+ going to have applications, ability to add pages, etc.. I am not signed up yet so i don’t know, but it looks like to me it’s apples and oranges.

  13. When facebook first came around everyone was amazed, but now its the same old boring stuff. If i go on its for about 5mins then im bored, there is nothing to keep me there. If google can overcome this obsticle of keeping its members online everyday for longer than five mins then yes facebook has alot to worry… We will just have to wait and see i guess :)

  14. Lisa Simpkins

    Facebook should be petrified.Google+ will soon become number one leaving Facebook in their dust.G+ is more user friendly and it doesn’t have the glitches that Facebook has.

  15. Hey Chris,

    I don’t think that Google will win over Facebook users. At least the ‘normal’ people. Marketers like us are flocking to Google+ because we see the potential, but for those people that just like to have fun and have something to do, I think they’re going to stay on Facebook.

  16. I think that Facebook is worried. I was exchanging FB private messages with a reporter and the “plus sign” on Google+ was truncated upon delivery. Partial blockage as it would seem.

  17. I have never liked Facebook, for a writer it is a real pain in the ass because they only allow 420 characters in a post. Having to create a “Note” page causes the visitor to have to search for it and do more work than they are willing to do.
    I hope somebody developes another social network where you can put whatever you want on your wall.

    Ron Leddy, Broadband Digital Media.com

  18. ummm

    Google+ is good…still messing w it, tho. I think there is always a chance it might not be popular. (anybody remember Google Buzz? That was a flop.) Who knows…..

  19. Hi I for one am happy to migrate from Facebook. Be happy to get a way from the games and all the inane requests and postings, if Google+ introduce games I hope there is an option to block all such – rather than on the individual basis. Photos, are all on my machine, only copies on F/B – would not rely on external primary storage.

    There may be some problem in getting friends to move across, but then there has always been the percentage who would not adopt email, or any form or social media (F/B has scared many off social media with its security/privacy issues) so one gets used to having mixed interactions. The ability to incorporate email into posts accommodates the friends who won’t join.

    Main limitation I see at the moment is the isolation, the lack of cross feeds to Twitter, Buzz, F/B, Linkedin – hopefully that will come.

  20. Gregory

    Yes. I am actually planning to use pick to zip to move all of my personal settings over. Fb has many security updates and changes that I just don’t trust. Google as been proven to be much safer and a protector of information.

  21. I think google+ will bring down facebook eventually because google have way to many faithful users and cool stuff, im getting tired of bing appear everytime I search for my friends and family and bing comes with other stuff that I don’t care about

  22. Tom T

    The public cannot submit to Google and let them become more controlling than they are at present. Their Bias search information controls the information that fits their agenda. Google search has not been an accurate resource after filtering the flow of information and feeding what they want you to believe.
    Beware of their power play.

  23. I don’t think Facebook is worried about a thing. You know why? Facebook has the girls! According to Google’s own statistics Men outnumber Women on Google+ by 9 to 1. I wrote about this last week in What do Facebook and the new movie ‘Without Men’ have in common? Could it be that all the men have run to Google+ ? It’s led to a rather heated discussion on why Facebook might appeal more to women than men. In fact women outnumber men on Facebook by about 6 to 4. If you’re looking to flirt, those statistics might get you moving depending on whether you’re a guy or a girl, but social media is so not really about that any more. Or is it? <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/15/google-one-hell-of-a-trojan-horse&quot;.TechCrunch joined in the fray stating “We’re all familiar enough with Google products to know that practically everything they’ve ever done was launched early and incomplete.” All I could think to equate that to how men are adopting Google+ and women not so much is by hypothesizing that perhaps men like cookie dough and women like cookies. Google+ needs to get in the oven and let us know when it’s done. Until then, Facebook is still my hangout.

  24. Google+ is a social networking site another google product which can be a killer for Facebook and Twitter. Facebook and other social networking site have gone too far by adding or integrating other features for their site such as games, video conferencing, calls, blogging and most specially “ads” and let us say people is forgetting Google. Unlike Google+, google already has an established products and ready to be integrated. One sign of integration is that Google has made already a “Main Menu” that is visible to most of their products, the Apple things, the Android Market Changes and the Buzz about Google Games.

    In the main time, Google+ will help people not to forget Google Services, as people nowadays are spending more times in the social networking site. The unique features of Google+, the so called Circle, Hangout, Huddle & etc., they are just answers to what Google has experienced from Orkut, Buzz and Wave and their response to the other social networking site. Their privacy is now pure, based on limited to “Public” and “Circles”. The Hangout is amazing which is to gather people from your circles and enjoy video conferencing and of course with YouTube capabilities. And also Huddle with your Android Phone, Symbians and “soon for Apple” as Plan B to let you not spend more time to your computer, and many more features after Google started to integrate their products. So whether Google+ will go to the top or not, Google will remain and attempt to pursue people with their another product again and again to be used.

    Thus, Google+ is just a special product for people to use along with other Google products. So, we cannot compare it with other social networking site, until integration is done.

  25. Yes — I think google +1 is going to give Facebook a real run.

  26. I have already disabled my account…

  27. Hi,

    We are advertising with Goole, but from last using most appropriate keywords Google is Free Seo Directories showing our ad.

    Could you please help us on this?

    Concerned information is here:

    http://www.senator.co.in

    Regards,
    Ajay

  28. Wow! Not sure where to even start, after reading all these comments. Maybe I should paraphrase everything in the Bard’s Olde English and then I’d bequeath ye all abrading ye skulls. To be, or not to be? That is the question. I am hoping that someone comes along and de-thrones the Big Three, myself(Google, Facebook, MS). But, even if that doesn’t happen, I still expect Facebook to take a seat alongside Friendster and Myspace in a few years. They already have a growing attrition rate in the U.S. and Canada, where they are the oldest, even though they are still growing by leaps and bounds in other parts of the world. By the way, how’s wi-fi in Nepal?

    • PS- trusting Google over Facebook! Wow! That’s a hoot! Does that comment deserve a Like, or a +1? Maybe I’ll just tweet about it in my Cuddle, er, I mean Huddle.

  29. Vice Biden

    You guys are hilarious. I read all this hype in comments about Google + and I just laugh. The same was said about Buzz, Wave. All this excitement will die off soon.

    Hey can anybody tell me how Google’s groupon killer is doing? Wait, let me LOL! Hilarious! Come on Chris, don’t be shy. Let’s hear it! Google is good for nothing. All they think about is money (yes, linking of accounts, selling of your info./privacy issues, etc.) How can they start from scratch and expect to succeed when there is an already established Facebook. They missed the boat by not buying Myspace.

    The only real threat Facebook has is from some pennyless programmer kid out of some college dorm, that’s it. Google + will go nowhere.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>