Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Facebook Continues To Yank Breastfeeding Photos

Gives fairly lengthy statement on the whole controversy

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 3 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Malcolm boura

    FB “strive”? You must be joking. If they were serious about doing what is right they would follow the evidence, not the prejudices endemic in some parts of the world. The objective evidence is very, very clear. Nudity does not cause harm to anyone off any age. Prudery results in widespread and often serious harm. The correlations are near perfect, the causal links well understood, the results appalling, but still Facebook continues to put body-prejudice and body-shame ahead of doing what is right. I will give one specific example but the pattern is the same for all the boy-knowledge, body-shame and body-image related indicators, including breast feeding. More prudish, worse outcomes, and often worse by an enormous amount. Compared to Denmark a teenager in the USA is several times more likely to have an abortion, about ten times more likely to become pregnant and several tens of time more likely to catch a sexually transmitted infection. Are you proud of yourselves Facebook, or is it profit and prejudice before all else?

  2. Lea

    I am a breastfeeding mom and I’m so happy people still care. I think its so import
    ant to show the whole world how much we love are children. I feel we are being shamed and told to hide such a beautiful and natural thing.

  3. Janet Ruderman

    The Ontario Court of Appeal ruled in 1996 that it is not indecent for a woman to bare her breasts in public. Therefore, it does not offend Facebook’s rule against nudity for a woman to post a picture of herself topless, anymore than a man posting a picture of himself topless would. I encourage all women to post a picture of themselves topless and to keep posting it until Facebook gets tired of deleting it. It’s time Facebook stood up to the bigots of the world and pointed out to them that they are 15 years behind the times.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>