Quantcast

EA Sucks at DRM Enforcement

When DRM goes too far

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:


EA Sucks at DRM Enforcement
[ Technology]

Digital distribution is the wave of the future (present?) when it comes to content delivery, and I’m not sure an industry has embraced this method of content delivery as much as the video game industry has. Well, not counting the music industry. Oh, and the book industry too. Hell, let’s just say the video game industry is successfully following in the footsteps of other entertainment industries and has in relation to delivering content without the need for a physical copy.

At least in regards to the PC gaming environment.

The success story of Steam’s online service is the industry standard, but there are others like Direct2Drive and Impulse. Electronic Arts, famously known as the makers of the Madden NFL Football series of video games, has also jumped on the digital distribution service with Origin, which offers EA-published games available for immediate download. The concept is a brilliant one as long as you aren’t one of the people who requires a jewel case with some cover art to legitimize your purchase.

There is, however, one issue in regards to using EA’s Origin service: consumers are at the mercy of EA’s DRM, which can apparently be applied whenever EA sees fit. Take the plight of an Origin member by the name of MaximumTacos. While the silliness of the name may be hard to overlook, the shafting he received from EA concerning access to games he’s already purchased is not.

The story of MaximumTacos’ EA issues hit the web yesterday, and after popular threads on Reddit and The Escapist’s forums, everything began to take shape. What we have is another user going to the EA forums and posting a profane message that made mention of the MaximumTacos user name.

Mind you, the post was not made by MaximumTacos, it just mentioned the user name during the profanity-filled rant, and because MaximumTacos had the audacity to allow his name to appear in a TOS-violating forum thread, he, and not the user who authored the post, got banned. Not banned as in banned from the forum, but banned from accessing the EA games he had purchased via digital distribution methods.

Or, as EA’s online customer support put it:

Angad: Please note that your account [maximumtacos@gmail.com] has been permanently terminated from the Electronic Arts Online service for violating the terms of services. The account will no longer be accessible in any way, and all property, items, and characters associated currently are or will soon be deleted.

This bears repeating: Electronic Arts banned the account of a user in such a way, they no longer have access to games they’ve already bought and paid for, all because someone else mentioned their user name during a profane rant.

Does that even make sense? Apparently to EA, it does, because they aren’t backing down even in the face of being so completely and utterly wrong with their punishment. As for the offending post in question, EA even referenced it when they informed MaximumTacos about the suspension, which turned into an outright ban:

Chat log: soldier shapes / camo to watch for, and the people camping in corners with it./quote so its no longer INFARED = IR YOU NOOB B—- C— maximumtacos

As you can see, MaximumTacos was the target of the profanity, not the author, but yet, he’s the one who gets banned? Does that make sense? Furthermore, does cussing on an EA-owned forum warrant an outright bannishment from EA, one that prevents access to content that’s already been bought and paid for? Here’s an image of what MaximumTacos was greeted with when he tried to access his copy of Battlefield: Bad Company 2:

Account Banned

Not only does EA’s punishment seem to completely overstep the severity of the crime, they aren’t even punishing the right person. This is, apparently, DRM at its best and most powerful, something Boing Boing’s post points out:

For years, DRM advocates scoffed at the idea that it would be used for bullshit like this — the refrain was always that it was about preventing piracy. But managing rights is what DRM was built to do, so that is what it’s used for.

What’s next from EA? Banning a reviewer who didn’t like their 2013 version of Madden? Or, perhaps banning someone who tweets about their dissatisfaction with an EA product? To cover his plight, MaximumTacos is starting a blog to document his dealings with EA, but at this point, I’d seriously consider legal representation, because not only is EA’s punishment entirely too severe — complete banishment from products for swearing at an EA forum? Isn’t that like 10 steps beyond what’s appropriate? — but it wasn’t even enforced against the right person.

It’s in the game, apparently.

EA Sucks at DRM Enforcement


Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • http://about.me/radie Will Radie

    Can we get a link to MaximunTaco’s blog?

  • ChrisH

    I thought this was about DRM. This is about the oldest whiney story there is in online gaming; “I got banned, not fair!”

    You aren’t writing about DRM, online multiplayer games and getting banned from the server has nothing to do with DRM. Blizzard, EA, Rockstar, Valve and all of the publishers have the right to ban jackasses from their online servers.

    None of this has anything to do with DRM.

    • TheKryptonite

      Techincally, it does actually. It’s definitely not what most DRM topics concern, but that’s not the point. The article is about an Origin user who was banned from his games, which he paid and downloaded through Origin. That’s most certainly DRM in work right there. DRM = Digital Rights Management.

      Now if he had just been ban from the forums then this would be a non-issue. To create a similar scenario, it would be like if a user got banned from STEAM for using foul language and they decided that user couldn’t access Skyrim anymore. The formula doesn’t fit there, and neither does it for this situation.

    • GeirLK

      Can he play his local copy of BFBC2? No. Why? Because the files needed are DRM encrypted, and they pulled the plug. Just because it has a remote trigger too, doesn’t mean it’s not DRM.

      It’s just as advertised; Digital Rights Management.

      And being a douche on a forum doesn’t warrant EA pulling the plug on all your Origin games. The punishment doesn’t reflect the crime. It’s like getting hanged for using harsh language.

  • Steven

    So basically anybody that spits out a user name on an EA forum and posts profanity can get the user they are talking about in the post banned from using that game online? If so, how about everybody does that and see if EA still thinks that’s a good policy when nobody plays or buys their games anymore.

  • IOwnedYou

    For the record MaximumTacos was a racist in BF3 calling out racial slurs whenever he was losing. I was in one of these matches with him when he insulted someone simply because of their name, calling the guy a “spick”.

    Anyone who is racist like this deserves whatever they get thrown at them.

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom