Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Cell Phones May Cause Cancer, Says WHO

We're all doomed, as nobody will ever give up their phones

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 8 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. What could be worst? One of our best means of communication produces cancer. What a price to pay.

  2. If something is of great utility (usage, etc), it will surely have its own problems as well; cell phones are no exception. Asking a person never to use his cell phone will seem ridiculous in today’s world in spite the common buzz of the various cancers that might arise due to excessive usage of the mobile phones. With the cell phones penetration into every corner in life where this kind of connectivity was not even thought off during the wired days, the mobile phone is a part and parcel of life that is equivalent to your personal vehicle. The cell phones are a handy device in case of emergency that’s inevitable in the present scenario. However, I think, if using a Bluetooth or a earpiece that moves away the user’s head from the antenna can reduce the RF(Radio Frequency) electromagnetic waves, then it’s worth a practice to keep ourselves at bay from the carcinogenic effect.

  3. These mixed signals from official sources are why people lose faith and start to believe in folk rumors like the anti-vaxers. Add to that everyone knows that corporations would sell babies arsenic if they thought they could get away with it and it’s little wonder people don’t believe a word they say. Pharma corps have put products on the market they knew resulted in death. They have falsified research, they have told researchers to falsify data. It’s a wonder people believe them at all.

  4. The frequencies of microwaves are close to the natural frequencies of biological molecules themselves. The resonance frequency of DNA is very close to the millimeter waves. They don’t have to ionize to do damage.

  5. I think this is kind of issue is nonsense. The WHO is mistaken. Cell phones do not produce enough radioactive energy to do any damage. And as far as I know, no study has ever shown any negative impact from cell phone use. If there were any danger of cancer, we’d have seen a huge spike in such cancers given the increased cell phone usage over the last two decades. There has been none. I can’t explain the WHO announcement, but will wait for more know legible people to comment. Right now, I think its garbage.

  6. Cell phones are the most important technological development since the internet. You can get unlimited amounts of information from practically any location, and you have a safety net if you are ever in an accident, lost, or broken down on the side of the road. It’s not just about texting your BFF. It’s about communication, which is the most important part of being a human.

  7. First heard about this many years ago, and have never owned a cell phone.
    And no, I don’t trust the government to protect consumers or ever do anything for them, since Congress and the regulatory agencies are all controlled by corporate interests.
    Once you understand that, life become much easier, since you simply know that all the PR and propaganda coming from the elite levels is definitely a bunch of BS, and they are definitely not looking out for our interests.

  8. If something is of great
    utility (usage, etc), it will surely have its own problems as well; cell
    phones are no exception. Asking a person never to use his cell phone will seem ridiculous in
    today’s world in spite the common buzz of the various cancers that might arise
    due to excessive usage of the mobile phones. With the cell phones penetration
    into every corner in life where this kind of connectivity was not even thought
    off during the wired days, the mobile phone is a part and parcel of life that
    is equivalent to your personal vehicle. The cell phones are a handy device in
    case of emergency that’s inevitable in the present scenario. However, I think,
    if using a Bluetooth or a earpiece that moves away the user’s head from the antenna
    can reduce the RF(Radio Frequency) electromagnetic waves, then it’s worth a practice
    to keep ourselves at bay from the carcinogenic effect.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>