Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Can Twitter Beat Facebook and Google+?

iOS 5 Twitter integration already a huge benefit for company

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 32 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Tom Walsh

    Twitter Sucks!

  2. Jack

    The only thing I use twitter for is to set up an account with them when I initially open a new website and post about 5 tweets, set up my description and URL and never ever look at it again.

  3. Don’t let two people dictate the answer. Twitter is a real time connection with customers, prospects and others in your industry. Facebook is a time drain geared towards a more social conversation. Unless you are a retailer or restaurant for which Facebook has some benefit, Twitter is a better way to keep your finger on the pulse of your customer’s needs and wants. But you have to take the time to understand how to use it properly. Follow me @putcustomers1st

    • Interesting point about business use. This is going to be an especially important facet to keep an eye on with Google+. We’re still waiting to see what Google does with the brand profiles. Given Google’s important role in search, Google certainly has some advantages in that area.

  4. Is Google+ really even in this “race”?

    • I would say yes, because of the fact that Google+ is Google. What it all boils down to in the end, and I’ve written on this in the past, is that Google+ is just a feature of Google as the broader entity. It’s about the Google account. “Google+ is Google,” is a statement that came from Google itself. Google plans to integrate it with everything. This isn’t another Google Buzz. It really comes back to the whole identity thing discussed in the article.

      • I don’t like how Google is going about getting people to use Google+. Basically the only reason people jumped on the Google+ bandwagon was fear that their websites would drop in rankings while the competition was using Google+ to drive their rankings higher. Google still is only testing to see if the +1 ratings will actually be a good signal to use for relevancy in search. I think it’s a bad idea to use this as a relevancy signal and good for a recommendation signal. There are already business that are giving away free stuff if you like them on Facebook (like free coupons), and so I could see a business getting +1′s for the sake of getting free stuff or even content that you wouldn’t be able to see unless you +1 the business. I’d like to hear how Google plans to stop this from happening as who wouldn’t +1 a business for say a free taco at Del Taco? I liked Del Taco on Facebook so that I can always print out a coupon when I want to eat at Del Taco, and I’m sure a lot of others did for that reason too.

  5. There is no way anyone will beat Facebook.

    Facebook has the market world-wide.

    If you want to meet up with friends and family, you need to go to the site with the most members – Facebook.

    • I don’t think it’s so much about going to the site with the most members, as it is to the site where YOUR friends and family are. That might still be Facebook, but that doesn’t mean it always will be, though it could be for the foreseeable future.

      And for the record, FB, Google+ and Twitter are all co-existing fairly well right now.

  6. Twittter KISS (Keep it simple and stupid) Excuse my colloquialism but the masive take up of smartphones particulary iPhone sales makes Twitter a clear front runner in this vertical market. With Google running a close second. It could even end up like Internet Explorers browser domination of the early 90′s when Microsoft factory shipped IE with their OS. We’ll have to wait and see

  7. Twitter doesn’t need to BEAT anyone to be successful.

    • This is true, but I’m sure they’d be happy to have more time spent on Facebook shifted over Twitter, and certainly the ID aspect.

  8. All social networking sites are good, as we have different types of contac with our friends/circles, etc., but for networked educators, Twitter is the hub, the main point from which all else radiates.

    @Marisa_C

  9. Twitter and FaceBook are different tools and have different uses. It is like comparing a torque wrench with a spanner.

    They also appeal to different personalities.

    On twitter a few quick words, nothing more. No complexity. That is, and will be, its limit. At best it is concise and precise, at its worst it is an endless stream of twittering noise.

    On FaceBook more detail is possible, it is more visual, but often it is just disconnected entities streaming down the page.

    I am somewhat concerned at much of the control freaky that has crept into Google. It may well be their eventual undoing.

  10. If brevity is the essence of wit as Shakespeare said. Then Twitter may win. But, without face book you can’t have a wall to post things on that are more than 140 characters. I have seen many tweets that refer the reader to facebook. Maybe, we need both.

  11. I believe that this is a moot point. Every Twitter user I know has a Facebook and most are also hopping onto Google+ as well. I do notice that people Tweet more often than they update their FB status.

    I don’t think this is a race to dethrone each other. They all benefit from each other actually.

  12. ‘it is Twitter’s simplicity that is its biggest weapon’ thats the key in my opinion, it is quicker and easier for everyone to use

    • Yeah we rean an article about that too. It was definitely interesting.

  13. basic to luxury rooms available, at foot of Batur volcano, beside batur lake

  14. as far as business use of social media is concerned, we did not get to use Google+ yet, but we used both Facebook and Twitter and we noticed some big differences:

    Facebook pros:
    - great for complex campaigns such as contests (you can post campaign rules and winner drawings; although this is somehow against their policy, most business accounts on Facebook use it that way to create buzz! )
    - great for adding content to attract potential customers (e.g.: extended product photo albums)

    Facebook cons:
    - lot’s of low income people, mostly youngsters, that have time to spend on Facebook but are not really buyers
    - busy people with available budget to spend do not really have the time to use Facebook as most of them realize it’s quite a time drain
    - paid advertising on Facebook have generated very low sales/conversion which confirms the above feeling that either people spending time on Facebook have little budget to spend or simply use Facebook as a friend/personal communication tool (I myself fall into this category)

    Twitter pros:
    - very simple to use once you understood how it works (the initial contact with Twitter seems to be quite confusing for many people I talked to, including myself, but if you are persistent enough to really understand it you will see the benefits; for myself, the somehow illogical structure of displaying info on the Twitter site was quite confusing ..)
    - on Twitter you would find more people with budgets to spend (including busy business people that are rarely active on Facebook, if they happen to have a FB account..)
    - very good for simple campaigns or as a notification tool (a very good way of notifying people and driving traffic to a campaign landing page)
    - much easier to use it permanently via mobile phones, so no surprise Tweeter teemed up with Apple! very smart and natural move!

    please keep us posted on Google+ progress as we are quite curious where they would go with that from a business use perspective!

  15. SeoCatalysts

    From my point of view,there is only competition between facebook and Google+ . Twitter is not in a race…Because it is used as for the different purpose and in a different way

  16. Roy

    There could be race between Google & Facebook but its almost impossible for Twitter to beat anyone of them.

  17. Zac

    What is this, a soap opera? Hooray for a Google+ invite, Facebook has peaked, Google+ is great, Google+ may maim twitter, Facebook is worried about Google+, Google+ catches up, Google+ is dead, Facebook has cool new features, Google+ is a knee-jerk reaction, and now Twitter threatens both of them.

  18. Twitter is the rage, it dominates, quick simple short burst for the person on the go. Yahooo bam bam (just something I always say)

  19. Johnson olekachi

    I think tweeter can never even come close to facebook talkless of google & facebook.

  20. You just can’t compare them that directly. Saying that Twitter would like to steal users’ time from Facebook is like saying they’d like to steal time from any other site on the web.

    Google+ is certainly in direct competition with Facebook with threaded conversations and rich media, although it doesn’t stand to fare well until Facebook makes some sort of really big misstep, which is certainly possible.

    But Twitter currently has no direct competition other than the occasional halfhearted attempt by others to create a public timeline, which never works because the propagation methods are different and the messages are too long with too much varying content.

    They are different animals with differing uses and different message propagation and content models. Another way to look at it is that if either Twitter or Facebook went away tomorrow, neither one’s functionality could replace the other. Some might try to make a case that Facebook could do what Twitter does, but that would be wrong. (Although I believe Facebook did buy FriendFeed a while back, which may have full standalone Twitter functionality within in.)

  21. It is always difficult to predict anything on the internet. In my opinion, I think that if the world goes more and more mobile, then there is a slight chance that Twitter may be the preferred choice by many. If it is going to eliminate FaceBook or G+ for completely, I am not sure, but if things move like what I have been doing, I’ve nearly abandoned the use of FB.

  22. Twitter is more on the short and simple way. But to beat Facebook and Google+, each is playing by it’s own sets of rules. Different league I would say. Pros and cons of every social media tools are there. There’s no flawless social media tools yet as of now.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>