Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Can Bing Take on Google With These New Features?

Bing Makes Real Use of that Facebook Data (and Much More)

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 17 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. vybixa

    Taking on Google with these new features they certainly have. With the Yahoo mix, certainly, Bing now can have a shot at google on the search front. Now what is left is to see whether searchers switch in droves to Bing (which they should) and whether the search results (with their new razmataz) are relevant indeed.

    • Chris Crum

      That relevance is a question. Sometimes Bing has shown some good concepts that haven’t necessarily lived up to their potential in terms of execution. The recently launched artist pages for example.

      • CHt

        If you care about Bing’s failures, maybe you outta check in to how many times Google has launched a new application and failed miserably. Google owns the failed-app category. It has a terrible track record of launching successful apps and features. When’s the last time anyone cared anything about Google Wave, Google SearchWiki, Google Audio Ads, Google Video, Dodgeball, Jaiku, Google Notebook, Google Catalogs, Google Print Ads, Google Page Creator, Google Answers, Google Buzz, Google Sidewiki, Google Knol, Orkut, Google X, Google Web Accelerator, Google Coupons, Google Voice Search, Google Viewer, Google Checkout…..

  2. I don’t think Bing’s new like feature will be enough for searchers to switch to bing. In order to compete with Google, it will take an incentive based experience for searchers. Example something like coupons or discounts offer by Bing or Yahoo for using their search engine. Google has the most content so it’s hard to overcome that but you can offer incentives that will help the searcher save money! That will always work!

    • Chris Crum

      Well, they’ve done the cashback thing in the past.

  3. I use Google as a Tool for business and while we are represented in Facebook
    I cannot see any business benefits to the new Bing features. As all the Search Engines
    rely on Trade advertizing, more social content of the facebook kind will reduce
    the value of this medium. I feel Google should stick to fast relevant search results
    and it will retain its faithfull followers and advertizers.

    • Chris Crum

      If you own a store that someone has “liked” on Facebook and that shows up in a Bing user’s search results, I can’t see that being a bad thing. Plus if the feature gets more people using Bing, it seems like more of a reason to advertise on Bing or increase advertising on Bing.

      • So, otherwords the more friends you have the higher the ranking you can achieve. Great for Facebook but disaster for Bing. If I have 2000 friends and asked them all to like my website, which they would just out of courtesy, and every one else did the same, it would come down to who has the most friends will land on top.

        Currently Bing’s results are rubbish and slow. I just finished a contract with a company and they had Bing as their homepage. 100% of the time I found myself having to switch to Google for relevant results. It was a real pain. The only thing that I liked about Bing, initially, was the way you could recieve a sneak preview of the website before entering it. Now Google has this.

        I think the only thing that peeves me about Google is that it is where it is today because of Webmasters from all around the world who have supported it and promoted it building awareness and hype around the platform. Now Google has turned its back on these people with the introduction of Google Location Maps and the reduction of organic results on the first page.

        Google seems to have the attitude that they no longer need webmaster support anymore, only Google Adword Agents and soon to come Google Map Agents as I am sure they will sell these map links eventually to the highest bidder.

        As a user, not as a webmaster, I think Google is doing a great job to make it even easier for people to find what they are looking for and this is what Google is meant to be all about.

        I feel the Webmaster needs to have more power as a protectorate of the internet. My suggestion is maybe unionising webmasters globally would be the key to the stranglehold that Google has over us.

        It really has got to the stage where webmasters are obsolete to Google and their is not enough people using any other search platform for webmasters to jump ship.

        Unionised we can remove our websites all at the same time playing havoc with Google’s Relevance and then relaunch them when Google conforms to further support the webmaster. The removal would move all users straight to other platforms as Google would be full of dead links and only cached pages, goodbye Google.

        This is the only way that the people can get back control of the internet.

    • CHt

      The thing people don’t seem to understand is that you have to be logged into Facebook in order to see the Facebook integration in your Bing results. So its totally dependent on if you’re logged in or not. If you want your standard search results, don’t log into Facebook. Its that easy. Bing even gives you a quick sign-in link on their homepage to login AND logout of Facebook. Its super fast and I think it adds to Bing’s relevancy, if you choose to login. The bottom line is that its OPTIONAL, but nobody seems to care about that little fact.

  4. Big statement, I know. The reason why I say this is that I use Avast Professional and a lot of pages I visit in Facebook I am informed that there is a Malware Trojan. How much privacy do people want to give away? I am sure this will come back to haunt the user.

    The information that Facebook steals from us can be used to manipulate us in all areas of life without us even realising it. Is Goebbels the founder of Facebook?

  5. Bing’s new features are very interesting but I have my concerns for the simple fact that I might no “Like” what my friends like. Therefore I might search results that are not exactly what I’m looking for just because Bing thinks what my friends “like” is what I “Like”.

    To certain extent that is logical and I think it will help Bing gain more search market shared but then again nothing stops Google from implementing the same features anytime soon.

    • CHt

      You’re wrong about Google implementing Facebook integration into search. Microsoft has a small stake in Facebook and have formed a multi-year partnership with them. Mark Zuckerberg has publicly stated that Google is their main competition. You won’t see any Facebook integration in Google at the level of Bing any time soon, at least not with Facebook’s seal-of-approval.

      I think these new Bing upgrades are good. Bing has been slowly innovating since day 1, and Google is taking notice because they see Bing as a real threat. Yeah, Google still dominates search, but if Bing wasn’t doing something right why would Google change their website to be more Bing-like?

  6. KamakshiSri

    Addition of new feature may help Bing but it cannot over take Google because google has vast content and Google’s results seem more relevant than bing. I have often found locating my searches more correctly on Google than Bing. Bing with Facebook also cannot over take Google.
    Well, Google can definitely do one thing better just to stick to its position that is offering fast and relevant results, though it seems likely that it is on its way to it with Google Instant and Googl;e Caffeine. Google’s index is already vast and its enlargement will definitely help to users to come back to it.

  7. It is all about the relevance. Google has done very good job in this.

  8. I’d like to see Microsoft give Google stronger competition in the PPC advertising arena. AdWords is a necessary evil for many small businesses but is so expensive it can take a huge chunk out of their profits. If Microsoft adCenter grows in popularity after it’s merger with Yahoo Search Marketing maybe it will force Google to lower it’s prices for AdWords clicks.

  9. As things progress it seems more people will be using the Like button just because their friends will see their likes.
    That`s enough if you`re one of the social mobile type . How prominently will likes be displayed in search results?
    To me it seems that Bing will take some customers away from Google or even others but not too many and only until Google follows suit..
    Don`t forget Google`s always thinking of,planning and releasing new features too!
    Google may lose a few now but i`m sure they`ll get them back at a later date.

    People i know say “What`s Bing” , sounds like a piece fell off something.(Bing,Bing,Boing).

  10. These all sound like great gimmicks to lure more visitors, but how about providing better search results?

    It’s funny how they try to make it more interactive, etc. But when I use a search engine, all i want is to get exactly what I’m looking for. Google is still unbeatable at that, and that won’t change with no fancy backgrounds, fancy “who likes this” or other gimmicky tactics. Bad results are just bad results no matter how you dress them up.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>