Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Apple’s Lithium Batteries Protected After House Vote

Congress votes to prevent regulations on transportation of said batteries

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 4 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Katherine Mack

    The way that this article is written suggests that Apple, Samsung, Panasonic and the rest are trying to get away with something. They are not, and neither are the thousands of smaller companies that manufacture and sell products containing lithium batteries. The proposed PHMSA rule is nothing short of riduculous. There has been a tremendous amount of work by the industry to prevent accidents with lithium batteries. Most accidents that occur in shipping are by companies and individuals who have no knowledge or (more likely) do not want to follow the existing and very stringent requirements for shipping lithium product. All lithium batteries are already classified as Class 9 Hazardous goods. This new rule would have classify all batteries and products containing batteries greater than 3.7Wh as Class 9. This means that your iPhone, iPad, Blackberry, any notebook PC are considered Class 9. So would all medical products including AEDs. If this rule goes through, the public should expect to pay an additional $50-$80 per phone for just the added shipping costs. You would also need to wait at least 6 months+ for your product as UPS, FedEX, DHL, etc. do not have the bandwith to ship any fraction of the products affected via Class 9 Hazardous.

    Next time, don’t put the fear of God in your article before your do your homework.

    • The description about the danger of lithium batteries isn’t from me, it’s from the official DoT proposal. This writer has no opinion on the legislation.

  2. Being Enlightend

    Apple’s name is in the title and content of this piece, implying they specifically had some involvement in the congressional action referenced. Yet there is not a shred of reporting that confirms this insinuation by inclusion. Apple is clearly not the only company that will benefit financially from this action by Republicans in Congress. So that indicates you have some direct interest in pointing the finger at Apple. Why does not matter. Assuming you have minimal credentials and training, your journalistic credibility and personal integrity are clearly lacking. You can choose to do better.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>