BEIJING—In a bold move to curb the rising tide of high-speed accidents involving electric vehicles, China’s Ministry of Public Security has proposed new regulations that would fundamentally alter how cars perform right after starting up. The draft standards, released this week, mandate that all passenger vehicles default to a restricted mode where accelerating from 0 to 100 kilometers per hour (about 62 mph) takes no less than five seconds upon each ignition.
This proposal comes amid growing concerns over the blistering acceleration capabilities of modern EVs, which can rocket from standstill to highway speeds in under three seconds—far quicker than most traditional gasoline cars. Sources like Carscoops report that the rule aims to ‘tame rapid launches’ by enforcing a boot-up in restricted performance mode, potentially reducing mishaps caused by unintended acceleration or driver error.
The Safety Imperative Behind the Proposal
Recent data from Chinese road safety authorities highlights a spike in EV-related crashes, often attributed to their instant torque delivery. For instance, models from manufacturers like BYD and Tesla can achieve 0-100 km/h in as little as 2.5 seconds, a feature marketed as a selling point but increasingly seen as a hazard on crowded urban streets.
According to CnEVPost, the regulation would require vehicles to start in a mode where full performance is not immediately available, allowing drivers to opt into higher modes manually. This echoes sentiments from industry observers who note that while EVs have revolutionized mobility, their power can overwhelm inexperienced drivers.
Implications for China’s Booming EV Market
China, the world’s largest EV market with over 13 million units expected to be sold in 2025, is no stranger to aggressive regulatory interventions. Posts on X (formerly Twitter) reflect mixed reactions, with some users praising the safety focus while others decry it as government overreach stifling innovation.
The proposal aligns with broader efforts to enhance vehicle safety standards, including mandates for advanced driver-assistance systems. As reported by electrive.com, the Ministry’s draft also includes requirements for improved pedestrian detection and emergency braking, signaling a comprehensive overhaul.
Challenges for Automakers and Global Ripple Effects
Major players like Tesla and domestic giants such as NIO and XPeng may need to reprogram their vehicles’ software to comply, potentially adding complexity to manufacturing and user interfaces. Industry insiders, as cited in CarNewsChina, warn that this could slow down the adoption of ultra-high-performance EVs, which have been a key differentiator in the competitive market.
Globally, the move could influence regulations elsewhere. In the U.S., where EV adoption is accelerating, similar concerns have been raised, though no such limits exist yet. A post on X from user Chris Bender suggests the U.S. might consider adopting similar rules, highlighting the policy’s potential international impact.
Technical Details and Enforcement Mechanisms
The proposed standard specifies that vehicles must default to this ‘gentle’ mode after every startup, with options for drivers to switch to sport or performance settings. Autoevolution notes that this would effectively cap initial acceleration, addressing issues like pedal confusion where drivers mistake the accelerator for the brake.
Enforcement would likely involve type approval processes, ensuring new models comply before hitting the market. This builds on China’s existing NEV policies, such as export licenses for EVs starting in 2026, as mentioned in X posts from GlobalAutoChain, aimed at maintaining quality and safety in international trade.
Industry Reactions and Consumer Sentiment
Automotive executives have expressed cautious support. For example, representatives from GAC, as seen in X discussions, emphasize the need to balance innovation with safety. However, enthusiasts on platforms like Hacker News, via Y Combinator’s site, debate whether this curtails the fun of driving high-performance vehicles.
Consumer sentiment, gleaned from recent X posts, shows division: some applaud the focus on road safety amid frequent EV crashes, while others view it as unnecessary nanny-state intervention. Publications like Teslarati report that the rule targets the root cause of many accidents—excessive speed from a standstill.
Historical Context of China’s Auto Regulations
China’s automotive landscape has evolved rapidly, with EVs surpassing 50% of sales a decade ahead of the 2035 target, as noted in X posts from Assaad Razzouk. This acceleration cap is part of a pattern, including earlier mandates for NEV plates in cities like Shanghai, restricting hybrids by 2023.
Compared to past policies, this one directly intervenes in vehicle dynamics, potentially setting a precedent for software-defined limitations. AutoBuzz.my describes it as China acknowledging its cars are ‘too fast,’ proposing a law to enforce slower launches.
Potential Economic and Innovation Impacts
The regulation could reshape R&D priorities, pushing automakers toward safer, more efficient designs rather than raw power. Economic analyses suggest minimal sales disruption, given China’s dominance in affordable EVs, but premium segments might feel the pinch.
Looking ahead, experts predict this could accelerate the integration of AI-driven safety features, ensuring that performance unlocks are context-aware, such as on highways versus city streets. Insights from Slashdot highlight discussions on how this tames ‘rapid launches’ for better public safety.
Broader Global Regulatory Trends
As EVs proliferate worldwide, similar debates are emerging in Europe and the U.S. The EU’s focus on emissions contrasts with China’s safety-centric approach, but both underscore the need for balanced regulation in the electric era.
In summary of ongoing dialogues, X posts from users like Kyle indicate China’s history of exceeding EV goals, suggesting this policy might similarly advance safety standards ahead of schedule, influencing global norms.


WebProNews is an iEntry Publication