As with any attempt to add accuracy to search ranking algorithm and PageRank calculation in the past, it should be acknowledged that will be sites that lose out on valuable traffic, that were clearly not doing anything devious.

While it’s true that quantity and quality of inbound links can be used as a sneaky tactic, the assumption that it’s all cheap spam – with no value to consumers is dangerous. For example, contribution to blogs, forums, industry organizations and even paid links on popular sites that are related to your business, and will drive people AND search engines to your website all are highly legitimate activities – and I am confident that Google is very cautious not to damage the rank or reputation of companies and site owners for taking part in these types of activities.

It is a pretty amazing phenomenon in our society though, that one company has to be the one to decide what flies as “honesty”, “deception”, “spam”.. when there are billions of dollars at stake.

They also must become the social editors, helping make sense of free speech, while protecting us (and our children) from inappropriate and offensive materials.

It’s a big responsibility indeed. When it comes to being an SEO professional, we try to follow a code of ethics (most of us) that should be seen as above board. It’s why many “black hat” tactics hold little weight for the long term and why most of us support the “Torching” as you phrase it.

As in the world of email marketing, the same applies to search. If a little “fire” will affect those with bad reputations, the quality of our profession improves – as the rest of the world sees it.

I’ve gotta think Google is on our side.

Best,
Joe

            free download tamil telugu hindi mp3 songs and 3gp video songs free wallpapers themes games mobile softwares