Read WebProNews
With Friends!

Women Prefer Blogs/Facebook To Twitter

Losing interest in traditional media

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 52 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Amy

    Ok David, since you seem to be a man of great prose and elaborate explanation, explain to me as a seemingly know-it-all the basis of linking. You pomposity is actually amusing so I would love to hear about how successful you are in this one venue? My staff ran a very successful SEO-eMarketing program and we did balance the work in many aspects of Internet Linking. We also did rogue studies on the value of Social Media and business relations and found for our demographic target market, there was a 4% response rate. Our Market consists of women 35 and older and in this group there was a overwhelmingly reluctance to respond positively to this media. We did a cross the board survey with over 1400 responders. Our best efforts came from linking building and raising our Google rankings for basic generic keywords and also using a fine balance of PPC, industry and specific manual submissions and also many other traditional SEO uses including newsletters and our own blog updated frequently. All I am saying Davey is that you need balance. It is clowns like you that make these assumptions about people and processes that just reinforce the opinion that SM are filled with “some” wanna-be business people who have no class or dictum on how to handle this new venue. Read a few other posts here and see if my way of thinking is out of line.

  2. I don’t think it’s a matter of picking one over another – Facebook, Twitter and blogs serve different purposes, and women (people, in generally, really) use the bits of each that they like, depending on what they’re trying to do.

    I’m on Facebook, I blog and I’m on Twitter. I would never dream of blogging on Facebook, and I wouldn’t post the same links and photos to Twitter as I do to Facebook. I have control over who sees what on Facebook, so it’s easier to feel like you’re in a more intimate space. My Twitter profile is open to the world, so there is less personal information posted, but it’s more conversational.

    If you come off like you’re trying to use Twitter as a way to make money (directly or indirectly) it will not work. People see right through it, and won’t take action on anything you post. There is also a high signal-to-noise ratio – tweets get missed, and unless your tweets are consistently compelling enough for people to add you to a group in their twitter client that is a higher priority than the other noise, your tweets will not even be seen by most of your followers. And if you’re pitching your product or service constantly, you are NOT providing anything consistently valuable.

    Connecting with people – you’re doing it wrong.

    It’s not the medium guys – its your old school technique failing in the new school.

    I follow around 2k people, and around 2k people follow me. Only the ones that actually engage me directly and consistently end up on a filter list in Nambu that makes sure I read every one of their tweets. You get what you give on Twitter. It’s that simple.

    I don’t know that the numbers cited in this “study” are particularly meaningful without more of a breakdown and clarification, but it’s interesting, even if on an anecdotal level.

    Just my two cents.

  3. Guest

    As one russian writer Sergei Dovlatov said – if woman just doesn’t like shoe laces of your shoes – whatever facts you tell her, just will consider you are wrong, or just won’t listen. I, personally (female) – don’t like how twitter look like – design, layout, whatever you call it. Facebook is much more inviting.

  4. women (or atleast the women i know) see twitter as a “look at me” type of tool. Where as Facebook is used by them to actually communicate with people they care about.

    I actually agree that Twitter is nothing more than a tool for attention seeker, but heck i’m on it all the time.

  5. I think I’m one of those women who prefers blogging and facebook rather than twitter. I used twitter in social networking and I know many people find Twitter very productive but more often I find it as a waste of time.

    I agree with Susan Wright’s statement; it’s one of the reasons why women preferred blogs and facebook.

  6. Guest

    Twitter is waste of time

    • Guest

      I would have to agree. Twitter has only gotten to where it is because web owners are using it to try and drive more customers to their sites.

      Mark
      http://www.controldatainc.com

  7. I would say that men go on more to make money, where as women to make connections. Doesn’t surprise me in the least. I would say most of my blog visitors, at least in the main category would tend to be women. Males only on the business related blogs. Thanks for the study, interesting info.

  8. I have long been a fan of Facebook and love its functionality…I have played around a little with Twitter but it just does not seem to hit the right note with me.

  9. adam

    Daisy’s psychic line
    24hrs 99% accuracy
    1902 215 553 $4.35p/m
    mobex cc 03 9421.9752

  10. How interesting this blog is, but, still I’m looking for a Chicago soap opera blogger who can take my three favorite topics a lot seriously than the ones from Chicago Now. Are there any by any chance?

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>