Read WebProNews
With Friends!

What Would You Change About Google Search?

Google's Matt Cutts Tells What He Would Change

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 61 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. I still use google for most of my searches but when I am searching for more specific content I use bing. If google does not adapt it could end up losing some of its market.

  2. amit singh rana

    hi, off course there is no dought that google is best search engine and best social website, not social only even GATE of internet who know about all website. if some featchur will be change in google it will be more helpfull to user.

    1. if we enter any word to search in search box then google give so many resut, that result some times not usefull for user because in some website if single word will be there then google will give, even some document is some where then also it give in result, so google have to categarise the result in result page, like this is website, this is related to documents, this is related to audio file, video file etc.

  3. Stop giving ranking preferences to AdSense Sites just to sell your ads!

    Google would deny this but search results do not………………

  4. Google must have options for optional search.

  5. I was looking for the ‘Fleisch Skat Club K

    • You should search by using quotes, something like this

      “Fleisch Skat Club K

  6. John

    Let’s google to figure out by themselves, smart asses. Ran out of ideas ?

  7. I use Google the most because of the ability to search for images, newsgroups, along with webpages, and the ability to search cached webpages with the search words highlighted.

    However, when it comes to general search capability, I find Google doesn’t do a good job. I have to weed through too many irrelevent sites that do not contain the words or phrases I’m looking for. There needs to be a way to have Google find only the sites that contain the words or phrases entered.

  8. What we would change in Google and other major search engines………

    Time and time again we find ourselves outnumbered and virtually outranked by Localized Directories for any searches relating to a city and product or service. An almost impossible task these days to SEO any local small business websites.

    Honestly, how many Directory Sites should be in the first 20 search results? Remember, they all have essentially the same information……. but yet search results are slap full of their listings rather than individual websites belonging to related local small businesses.

    At least that’s our opinion……… Localized Directories should make up no more that 30% of search results…..not 70% as they many times do now that there are so many.

  9. I would change it to be more like Bing. Find it has more relevant searches for what I input.

  10. Guest

    I was wondering if it’s possible to do a search of the search results Google returns. i.e. a search of a search. For example if I search for “elephants” I would enter “elephants” and then to further reduce and refine the search I should be allowed to do a search for example of all the youtube website results that appear initially in my search results of “elephants”.
    Thank you.

  11. I agree that google is getting less and less relevant. im tired of searches for just about anything resulting in hundreds of listings for social network sites. im usually looking for relevant websites, not trying to find “friends”

  12. Amidst all the negative comments and personal wishes regarding what Google should do, I personally believe they shouldn’t do anything differently. Continue developing, building, testing and moving forward with technology. What’s right for the times at hand will surface, and those who waste time and energy on a “coulda, shoulda, woulda” attitude are only limiting themselves.

  13. Guest

    I like the new web options that allowed results to be displayed in the last hour, or last day or last week, or last year.

    But hey, what about offering the last month? The gap between last week and last year is far too wide.

    • You can get to 1 month by going over to the advanced search page, fyi. It would be nice to have it in one place, however.

  14. The thing I would change is the displaying of directory sites in natural listings – if I wanted to search a directory I would do so – I want to see websites – maybe Google could have a button that enables users to filter out/in directory sites.

    • Thanks for your post…… very similar to my own…….. glad to know others are out there that have had it with the Localized Directories dominating search results…….. especially for the 99% that were not even searching for a Directory t begin with. Obviously “if” they wanted a Local Directory” ….. that’s what they would be using or searching for.

      Maybe Google and the other major search engines will wake up and realize that they are actually driving the public into simply utilizing Directories to begin with by allowing Directories such dominance.

  15. Hi, my name is Tonya. I am a Website Designer and a Social Media Marketing Specialist.
    I LOVE this question! I would love to see Google add more than 1 type of search engine
    results that would appear on the same page for every search engine inquiry.

    For example, let’s say that I do a search on Google for “website design”.

    Now, we get paid ads being displayed always at the top and natural search
    engine results show up underneath the paid ads. I would like to see this
    remain the same, but also add the following:

    -An INDEX with all of the websites listed in alphabetical order
    -Twitter results
    -YouTube Video results
    -Facebook results
    -MySpace results
    -Google Local Business Map results
    -Blogger Results
    -Miscellaneous Blog results

    *This new Google Web Page Layout would look like this below:

    Google could have a 8 column web page to where all of the paid
    ads still show up on top all the way across the page from left to right
    and then underneath the paid ads would be 4 columns and then
    another 4 columns which will make a total of 8 columns of
    Google Search Engine Results all appearing on the 1st page
    of results.

    -The 1st column would be for the INDEX that would list all of the websites that
    contained the keyword “website design” and list those websites in alphabetical order

    -The 2nd column would be for a list of Natural Search Engine Results
    for the keywords “website design”

    -The 3rd column to the right would be for Twitter results for the keywords “website design”

    -The 4th column to the right would be for Facebook Results

    -The 5th column would be for MySpace Results

    -The 6th column would be for blog results

    -The 7th column would be for Google Local Business Map Results

    -The 8th column would be for YouTube Video Results, etc

    *More columns can be added such as for ALL
    of the SHARE SITES like Digg, Yahoo Buzz, etc.

    The reason that I feel that this type of search engine result page would
    be more beneficial is because it would give more websites the opportunity
    to be seen on the 1st page of Google instead of being hidden under pages
    and pages of search engine results. Plus, it would give Google users
    more variety to click on.

    Think about it? Sometimes people are in the mood to read a short Tweet and
    other times people are in the mood to watch a short video about their search
    engine result. So why not give users BOTH results to select from on the same page.

    I would also like to see Google change their algorithm in order to display
    websites that are more current and up-to-date as an important part
    of their ranking factors because sometimes a website gets ranked high
    because they have hundreds of web pages on their site, but what about the
    1 or 2 year old website owner who has less pages, but newer content to share?

    Newer websites tend to have newer content anyway because they are working hard
    on adding new content to their site in order to get listed higher on search engines,
    so why shouldn’t Google give those new website a little boost in their rankings for
    their efforts in trying? If search engines do not give the little a guy/lady a try and
    help him or her out some with their page rankings, then more and more websites
    will fail and shut down which can become detrimental to the economy and to the
    Internet community.

    In my last college class in Information Technology/Visual Communication, my classmates
    and I had to create a user manual for Virtual Organizations. In our user manual, we talked
    about Facebook.com, MeetUp.com, and also about the University of Phoenix.
    I learned a very valuable lesson in our class and that was to give users
    a variety to select from.

    For example, when you are reading a book or an eBook, do you like to
    go straight to the INDEX, the TABLE OF CONTENTS, or to the GLOSSARY
    to find what you are looking for?

    Everyone is different and that is why it is best to offer all
    3 aspects in a book or in an eBook in order to please everyone.

    I feel that this same principle should be carried on in website design
    as well as in how search engines display their information to their users.
    I really LOVE this idea and I will be emailing a copy of my response here
    to Google in hopes that they will implement this NEW way for their users
    to retrieve information from Google search engines. Thank you for taking the
    time to read my response and please feel free to share my comment with others.

    Sincerely yours,
    Tonya Becker-Haddadeen
    in Stafford, VA, USA near Washington DC
    John 3:16

    *Please check out my website at
    http://www.1-Dynamic-Design.com

    *Also, please add me on Twitter at
    http://www.Twitter.com/eBayHomeBizHelp

    *And please add me on Facebook at
    http://www.Facebook.com/TonyasDynamicDesigns

  16. google wants to keep its leading position in the search field, it does need the broader mind to accept the suggestions from different sources.

  17. His idea is brilliant. I have never thought about it but since I emailed search results’ links so I would like to see that changes as well.

  18. I agree, that Google should return to be a search engine, not a redirecting engine, as some ‘SEO’ people gets their stuff to the top, when it has no relevalnce to the topic being searched. And may not even contain content, yet that URL was returned in the top 10 listings of google???

    What I would like is an extra row of radio buttons, below the region and all search buttons is
    Content/Articles/ Information websites
    Shopping websites

    That would really help me, as when I want to buy online I can be pointed to a shopping cart, to search for information not related to shopping then I would like to see content.

    I do not mind banner ads and buy now links, etc . but not be pointed to a shopping only cart URL , only because it returned in the top 10 results with no info, and then the product does not even exist in their inventory or even being available !

  19. I agree, that Google should return to be a search engine, not a redirecting engine, as some ‘SEO’ people gets their stuff to the top, when it has no relevalnce to the topic being searched. And may not even contain content, yet that URL was returned in the top 10 listings of google???

    What I would like is an extra row of radio buttons, below the region and all search buttons is
    Content/Articles/ Information websites
    Shopping websites

    That would really help me, as when I want to buy online I can be pointed to a shopping cart, to search for information not related to shopping then I would like to see content.

    I do not mind banner ads and buy now links, etc . but not be pointed to a shopping only cart URL , only because it returned in the top 10 results with no info, and then the product does not even exist in their inventory or even being available !

  20. Guest

    I dont like all of the images now on the search. If we wanted images we would go to google images.

  21. Please take out all link farms, directories of directories, and lists of lists that come up when you type in a search.

    Just have the algorithm post relevant terms addressing the search, not just the first link that comes up with the most links in it or the most iterations of just the search term itself.

    It is so annoying to type in say “shakesphere” and get the first two pages of search be just directories of “English Literature” or London clubs. It should be items actually with the word Shakesphere as used in “THE AUTHOR” and not just be count of websites that have Shakesphere somewhere on the page.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>