Read WebProNews
With Friends!

What Is Wardriving And How Can You Prevent It

Get the WebProNews Newsletter!
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
There are 3 Comments. Add Yours.
  1. Crimius

    the linux program you are probably thinking of is Kismet, not Cismet. to my knowledge, EAP is not an encryption type, at least not one that is employed for wireless communication, and you might have meant WPA/WPA2, which comes now on most routers and is many times more secure than WEP.

    • Crimius

      also, you list several steps that can be taken but do nothing to speak of how to do this short of look at the configuration page. Where does a user find out their MAC address? Their routers password?

      Using misleading terms like “cloaking your SSID” i rather offensive as well, since it’s totally wrong. Stopping your router from broadcasting an SSID means it doesn’t broadcast it, not it shields or covers it up. the only way to connect to it then is if you know what the SSID is. picking out and emulating a MAC address doesn’t take crap for time either, it’s as simple as a setting with the right program.

      My advice is to limit the number of DHCP clients your router gives out, that way any wardrivers must have a statically/manually set IP address, which may or may not be in your subnet range to connect. Most routers out of the box are set with a very high or unlimited number of DHCP clients, which is a big security risk. Also, change the addressing range while you’re here, the less default factory settings you can get along without the better. Any kind of hacker is dependent to an extent on systems being the same or laid out in a similar fashion, so the more unfamiliar you make your setup, the better. this is a simple setting on most routers and is listed with the other DHCP settings.

      Honestly, the best wireless security is to use a wire, plain and simple. And the best network security you can use is to not use a network (ie. the Internet) at all. simple.

  2. Matt

    This article is very misleading and inaccurate. As one of the leading wardrivers in the world I can tell you very safely that once a wardriver breaks into a wireless network he ceases to be a wardriver and becomes a “hacker” or electronic criminal. Wardriving is merely the practice of logging the name and location of wireless networks and has nothing to do with electronic breaking and entering as the author has described. Would he also say that everyone with a drivers license will eventually commit manslaughter with their automobile? There is no need to protect yourself against wardrivers but there is a need to protect against wireless criminals. The problem with this article is the broad demonization of law abiding hobbyists who do not deserve this sort of negative press coverage.

What do you think? Respond.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>