Why would anyone care if Murdoch's sites get delisted from Google? Let them start charging for content. I myself want to see how long they will last. No long, methinks.
In a recent interview we wrote about this morning, Rupert Murdoch indicated that News Corp. may block search engines from indexing its sites. Now, it doesn't exactly look like Google's going to offer money to him (or throw a fit) in response, as the search giant's more or less replied by saying "fine."
Actually, depending on what sort of tone you attribute to them, some of the comments made to Emma Barnett came closer to "it's your funeral." A spokesman told her, "Google News and web search are a tremendous source of promotion for news organisations, sending them about 100,000 clicks every minute."
And later, there was something approaching "make my day." The spokesman said, "If publishers want their content to be removed from Google News specifically all they need to do is tell us."
So it should be interesting to see what happens. Judging solely by the comments on our earlier piece and Barnett's article, it seems that Murdoch might wind up missing "search people" (as he referred to them) a lot more than searchers would miss News Corp.'s content.

Pay walls have worked in some specific instances, though, and since any disappearing act News Corp. pulled would almost certainly receive tons of mainstream media coverage, the publicity-generating value of the unprecedented move is interesting to consider.
Related Articles:
> Murdoch On Blocking Search Engines: "I Think We Will"
> MySpace To Miss $100 Million From Google Search Deal
> Murdoch Says Newspapers Must Charge For Online Content
Publish A Comment
| Popular WPN Business Resources |
-

Search + Social = Better ROI
Are you utilizing search and social media together? According to Lee... -

Yahoo Reveals SEM of Re-Brand
Near the end of September, Yahoo began a new branding campaign in an... -

Marketing in the Age of Google
Former Googler Vanessa Fox has written a book entitled Marketing in...
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising





















Seems Odd
Seems odd that Murdoch would make a point about converting some of their content to subscription based. Websites do it all the time to generate extra income. I don't think Google would have noticed.