iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Visit Twellow.com
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
10 commentsFriday, September 25, 2009

The Web Weighs In On Twitter's $1 Billion Valuation

The good, the bad, and the funny

We first reported that Twitter was raising funds at a $1 billion valuation eight days ago.  Since then, the amount of money Twitter's supposed to be raising has doubled, and more details about who's supplying the cash have surfaced.  As you might imagine, all of this has generated quite a lot of discussion.

What are your thoughts on Twitter's reported $1 billion valuation?  Let us know.

Twitter Logo

Below, we'll try to provide a roundup of people's reactions.  Fair warning: incredulous takes appear to outweigh supportive ones by a significant margin.  And also, in case you've missed all of the big headlines, here are the latest facts as reported by the Wall Street Journal: Twitter is raising $100 million from investors including T. Rowe Price.

As for responses, Jason Fried's Onion-like comeback is perhaps getting the most attention.  In a fake press release, he wrote, "37signals is now a $100 billion dollar company, according to a group of investors who have agreed to purchase 0.000000001% of the company in exchange for $1."  The piece has received more than 160 comments, most of which amount to pats on the back.

Then there's the observation of Dan Frommer and Kamelia Angelova to consider.  In an article titled "Twitter Raises Cash Pile As Traffic Growth Slows," they noted, "During August, the company attracted 55 million unique visitors (worldwide) to Twitter.com, according to comScore.  That's up about 3 million, or 6%, over July.  That's solid, but nothing like its go-go month of April, when it grew by 13 million uniques (~70% m/m) or June, when it grew by 7 million uniques (~20% m/m)."

Still, there were some neutral and even positive remarks about the investment round.  David Carr just went for a sort of comedic approach with the following tweet:

Then Larry Dignan raised a very good point about T. Rowe Price's involvement.  "This mutual fund firm, which I know well, isn't exactly a run-and-gun investment house," he wrote.  "These folks play long term and tout planning for the long run."

So perhaps Twitter's strategy to make money - which at this point, may consist of selling premium accounts and/or data analytics services, along with introducing ads - is further along than most critics thought.  Anyway, we'd be interested to hear your opinions concerning the $1 billion valuation in the comments section below.

About the author:
Doug is a staff writer for WebProNews. Visit WebProNews for the latest eBusiness news.

Real Value

Advertising revenue = $0.00

Subscription Revnue = $0.00

Potential for adverting revenue = $0.00

Potential for = 2.99per month for 1% of it's users.

x20 years = Twitter's real value.

anyone saying substantially different is a fool, hereby declares Texx Smith.

Easy Target

Twitter is an easy target as their current business model is like the dot com bombs from the late 1990s that never made a profit.

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info