iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
5 commentsWednesday, August 26, 2009

Sticking an Ad Where Users Are Already Engaging

Microsoft Applies for CAPTCHA Ad Patent

There's one area of your site that if you include it, users have no choice but to engage, if they wish to continue with the task they're trying to complete. That would be the CAPTCHA, other wise known as that annoying, (often times barely legible) word you have to recreate in a box, so that the site knows you're human.

So if the user is already engaging with this, why not make it an ad? That appears to be Microsoft's mentality, as it has proposed exactly that with a patent application. The concept is simple. It works just like any other CAPTCHA, but it shows you a picture of a product (the Xbox 360 in an example from Microsoft) and asks you to type the name of the product you see.

Xbox CAPTCHA

Todd Bishop at TechFlash points to this and actually another mention of this concept from as long as four years ago, at Ad Lab, which simply presents the concept, showing logos for Tide and UPS.

Clearly this is a concept that has been around for some time, but you don't see it very often, and you have to wonder why that is. There's no question that the CAPTCHA is intrusive, and perhaps brands won't always want to be associated with that kind of advertising, but in reality, it's not the ad itself that is intrusive. It's the step of completing the CAPTCHA form, which is already there. If it's already there, you might as well utilize that space for some further benefit.

What you would not want to do is start displaying more CAPTCHAs specifically for the purpose of advertising. That's where things could go sour. On the other hand, a user might not know the difference, and could reach the conclusion that you're just throwing an intrusive advertisement at them.

The strategy has its pros and cons. It is an interesting strategy nonetheless. Obviously there is no click value to this from the advertising standpoint, but the brand value is certainly there.

What do you think about this concept? Have you seen it in use? Do you think users would be more turned off by something like this than they already are with the CAPTCHA itself? Please share your thoughts.

About the author:
Chris Crum has been a part of the WebProNews team and the iEntry Network of B2B Publications since 2003. Twitter: @CCrum237

This is another kinda

This is another kinda marketing strategy were you remind the user that the product exists, eventually one day the user will definitely browse for it and in turn increase the popularity of the page.

Well....

I think it's a nice touch for branding, but I expect the advertiser to pay more for those types of ads because they'll be sold on a CPM basis.

I guess you couldn't get any click fraud there, but impression fraud?

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info