iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Visit Twellow.com
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
4 commentsWednesday, June 17, 2009

AP Has Some Ideas For Making Money Online

May Charge Readers, May Offer Landing Pages

The Associated Press (AP) is saying it hopes to negotiate more lucrative licensing deals with major web sites. Reporting for the AP itself, Michale Liedtke says that AP CEO Tom Curley discussed possible revenue initiatives to protect online content.

AP logo

Here are some key facts from the Liedtke's piece: 

- Curley said after lowering its fees for U.S. newspapers by $30 million this year, the AP will reduce fees by a total of $45 million for newspapers and broadcasters next year. The plan had previously been to lower newspaper fees by $35 million.

- Curley said the AP expects its revenue to decrease both this year and next year.

- The AP intends to cut 10% of its payroll costs by the end of the year. The goal is to achieve this through attrition and early retirement offers, but layoffs haven't been ruled out

- The AP's contract with Google expires at the end of the year

- The AP's four largest online partnerships are with Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and AOL.

The AP is talking about one idea to get revenue from ads attached to its content that would include bundles of some of the organizations top stories with those of newspapers and broadcasters on different topics. This concept would include AP landing pages that they say could compete with Google News, Yahoo News and MSN.

The AP is also considering charging readers to see some of its online content. What do you think about the ideas the AP is tossing around? Would you pay to view some of the AP's content?

About the author:
Chris Crum has been a part of the WebProNews team and the iEntry Network of B2B Publications since 2003. Twitter: @CCrum237

Personally I would not pay

Personally I would not pay for their content, my contention is the news should be free. But I do see the point they make about charging to cover their overhead.

Sally the Speed Cleaning expert.

Paying for content isnt the issue. Sensationalism is.

The question in my mind is really about the process. Right now we receive news from many sources and sensationalism occurs to drive viewing habits which build ad revenues and are based on popularity. Financial news and information is a pay for play model and the less sensational the more valid. So, if we begin to pay for our news, then do we get more of the facts and less of the sensationalism or do we still have to endure the creative headline writing because it sells the content?

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info