iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Visit Twellow.com
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
3 commentsMonday, January 26, 2009

Google on Defusing Googlebombs

Matt Cutts Talks Algorithms

Google only needs to run its "Googlebomb" algorithm once in a while. And just recently, one of these times emerged. You may have read about it. Obama was ranking for "failure".

He doesn't rank for failure anymore, and that's because Google ran the algorithm. Matt Cutts was kind enough to explain Google's process for this type of thing:

The short answer is that we do two different things — both of them algorithmic — to handle Googlebombs: detect Googlebombs and then mitigate their impact. The second algorithm (mitigating the impact of Googlebombs) is always running in our productionized systems. The first algorithm (detecting Googlebombs) has to process our entire web index, so in most typical cases we tend not to run that algorithm every single time we crawl new web data. I think that during 2008 we re-ran the Googlebomb detection algorithm 5-6 times, for example. You can think of it like this:

Googlebomb or linkbomb pipeline

Cutts also made a brief post on Google's Public Policy Blog, explaining the situation. Now that the information is out about how Google handles these things, one of two things could happen. Either people will stop trying it because they know it's pointless because Google can just run its algorithm and stop it, or they will do it more just to annoy Google and make them run the algorithm all the time.

Meanwhile, Yahoo remains bombed. I have yet to see any explanations from them on the matter. If they have a similar algorithm, apparently they have yet to run it.

About the author:
Chris Crum has been a part of the WebProNews team and the iEntry Network of B2B Publications since 2003. Twitter: @CCrum237

Missed the chance to see GoogleBomb

Thanks for information...i have missed the chance to see that bomb....now it removed from both yahoo and Google....I will post this information on my news wire as well.

yes...Matt described the filtration process of Google but i am still confused and have some queries in my mind..i will post it on Matt's blog or Google group...hopefully i will get my answers there.

Thanks WPN..:)

Vishal

very biased

It seems like Google now work under the influence of governments. In China it is understandable but what about country believes in democracy?

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info