iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Visit Twellow.com
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
3 commentsFriday, December 5, 2008

WSJ Editor Doesn't Get Internet Advertising

Are online news readers less attentive?

Wall Street Journal Managing Editor Robert Thomson spoke about a print advertising resurgence in a speech at the Reuters Media Summit in New York. He thinks advertisers are moving back to print because of his belief that print has a more attentive readership than Internet news readers.

From Reuters ...

Thomson believes that advertisers are starting to understand that consumers often ignore ads in other media because they are doing other things at the same time that sap their attention.

With papers, the ads may be more valuable because they stick around with the printed page. Online, people get distracted, flipping from page to page, and if they notice ads at all, it is because they are annoyed by their intrusion.

"The only multi-tasking that you can do while reading a newspaper is drink a cup of coffee," he said. Online, he said, the link between the reader and the ad is more transient.

I think it is ironic that he used the phrase "flipping from page to page" when he was referring to online browsing, because that is exactly what happens when you read the paper version of a newspaper. But let's get to my real disagreement with Mr. Thomson, all advertising is somewhat of an intrusion because most people would rather read the news than be alerted to a new product to buy.

So the real question here is which is more valuable to the advertiser, print or online? Mr. Thomson believes that a print newspaper reader is more on task and is therefore more likely to notice an ad. Really? That assumes the reader actually "flipped" to the page your ad was on. Whether he flipped or not, the advertiser paid for the impression. Online, advertisers only pay when a user opens the page that your ad is on.

Have you clicked your newspaper lately?

 The Internet also allows the advertiser to know when someone clicks an ad and can follow that clicker all the way to the sale so companies can keep advertising where their advertising is making a positive impact on sales. This is the real  reason print is losing advertising budgets to online and I personally don't see this trend changing.

I have to give Mr. Thompson credit for coming up with an angle on why the newspaper industry will resurge with advertisers. But .... is a coffee drinking newspaper reader really more attentive to ads?

News Tags: Advertising
About the author:
Rich Ord is the CEO of iEntry, Inc. which includes WebProNews.com, Twellow.com and numerous other vertical and community sites.

Nonsense

I work for 'a large newspaper company' and I fully agree with your points. The future of journalism is online.

Better get online dude

I guess he doesn't use the internet in making his point there. I mean Internet has a worldwide Audience and this is surely help popularize any newspaper.I guess less online readers to WSJ contribute to that speech mentioned.But internet is the future way of reading newspapers.

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
12 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info