YouTube Gets Tougher On Sexual Content
Changes thumbnail selection process, too
Marketers, young men, and YouTube's many bikini-clad seductresses are about to get an unpleasant surprise. As part of what appears to be a crackdown on both sexual content and more general attempts to mislead users, the video-sharing site is pushing the pretty ladies off some of its most popular pages.
A post on the YouTube Blog makes the process official, stating, "Videos that are considered sexually suggestive, or that contain profanity, will be algorithmically demoted on our 'Most Viewed,' 'Top Favorited,' and other browse pages." This is likely to create a huge dent in the size of the videos' audiences.
As for what level of cleavage and such is acceptable, the post simply continues, "The classification of these types of videos is based on a number of factors, including video content and descriptions." So it'll be interesting to see where a line is drawn.
A different change relates to new age restrictions. YouTube claims that it's "tightening the standard for what is considered 'sexually suggestive,'" and clips fitting the definition will be "available only to viewers who are 18 or older." But it'll be a rare boy who can't figure out how to type his way around that.
Finally, there is one move that will affect just about every YouTube content creator. Instead of three thumbnail options being offered on the basis of their chronological standing in a clip, an algorithm will choose the trio of alternatives. So there will be much less point in packing a video's most interesting visuals around the 25, 50, and 75 percent marks.
Let the wailing and gnashing of teeth begin. Just remember: rending clothes may reduce your views.
Search Bing From Hotmail Inbox to Insert ContentBing Added to Quick Add Feature
-

Real-Time Search Engines Rush to Fill New Need
Twitter has produced a hot new trend: real-time search. -

Google's OS to Challenge Microsoft?
Googlers Sundar Pichai and Linus Upson announced on Wednesday that... -

Is Twitter Scaring Google?
There have been multiple reports that Twitter could replace Google. -

User Authentication Services: Good or Bad?
Products such as OpenID, Facebook Connect, and Google Friend Connect...
WWDC Demo: two tip calculators The Unofficial Apple...
Fidelity doubles stake in... Seattle Times
How To: Excel At Excel For SEM... Search Engine Land
Forecaster of the Month:... MarketWatch
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising





















1 Comment
It is good that they are
It is good that they are doing this. My kids view cartoons on youtube, and end up being exposed to a lot of sexual content much more serious than those depicted above. The trick used by those perpetrators is to pick a completely 'innocent' clip (it could even be scientific), and chose that exact wrong moment in the clip and use it as the thumbnail. This is a problem. You find yourself unable to complain, but you are sure this is deliperate as there is a distinguishable pattern on those videos. For example, going to the offensive video page itself you would find similar content under the 'related tab'. All videos about different topics, yet somehow, they all managed to have a thumbnail of a thinly clad female!
Post new comment