Implies all site owners should have accounts
Washington Attorney General Goes After Iffy SEO Firm
Lawsuit called a matter of consumer protection
The Washington Attorney General's Office is less than happy with a Redmond-based SEO firm. The business and its owner, who have operated through sites including Visible.net, Captures.com, and WebMarketingSource.com, now face a lawsuit.
Washington state accuses Visible.net and Gilbert Walker of a few slippery-sounding acts: not registering as a commercial telephone solicitor, misrepresenting the company's ability to attract traffic, and being quite difficult to contact.
Things begin to look more even serious as the accusations move on to Visible.net claiming corporate affiliations that don't exist and charging customers' credit cards after they'd attempted to cancel the service. Also, it seems that the Attorney General's Office and Better Business Bureau received about 90 complaints.
As a result, the lawsuit seeks restitution, "a permanent injunction enjoining and restraining defendants," and "civil penalties . . . of up to two thousand dollars ($2,000) per violation against the defendants for each and every violation." Plus court costs.
SEO specialists may want to think about the possible problem of guilt by association, and address their customers' concerns as needed. On the brighter side, if Visible.net has done everything it's been accused of, its removal will make the industry cleaner, and Visible.net's customers may seek other SEO companies to meet their needs.
No court dates appear to have been set just yet.
Implies all site owners should have accounts
-

Is the Search Industry Heating Up?
A lot has been happening in the search industry over the last year. -

What Comes Next in Social Media?
The coming of Oprah and Ashton Kutcher to Twitter brought a whole new... -

How Can I Compete with Oprah on Twitter?
Twitter is undoubtedly one of the hottest spots on the Web. -

Using StumbleUpon to Drive More Traffic
If a social media expert devotes an entire presentation to one social...
Optimism about the economy stalls... CNNMoney.com
WiMax Ready To Surge Again InformationWeek - All...
How to Improve IT Cyber Security... eWeek
Sonic Youth takes a swipe at... Seattle Times
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising



















5 Comments
if this correct than they must pay for this
If Visible.net is guilty than they must pay for that as SEO Professional i personally feel that cheating with customer not tolerable.
tiffany jewellery
good
Interesting
I dont know anything about this SEO firm so I certainly would not judge whether they are innocent or guilty but from an abstract point of view cleaning up the landscape of so many underhanded SEO companies is not such a bad thing. Will be interesting to see where this goes and if any other SEO companies pay attention. My guess is they wont.
Official Company Stance
Read our official response to the AG Release here...
http://www.visible.net/visiblog/visiblenet-is-serious-about-customer-service-support/
lol I'd say they're more
lol I'd say they're more con-artists than actual SEO's.
Post new comment