iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
76 commentsSaturday, October 11, 2008

This Cesspool We Call the Internet

...as Google CEO Eric Schmidt Puts it.

Eric Schmidt

Google CEO Eric Schmidt called the Internet a "Cesspool" Wednesday in reference to the quality of content and the amount of false information residing on it. This according to AdAge is a subject he spoke about with an audience of magazine executives at Google's campus, where an annual industry conference was taking place.

Schmidt stressed that "Brands are the solution, not the problem...Brands are how you sort out the cesspool." 

I couldn't agree more.

In response to an inquiry for advice about appearing more popular on Google, Schmidt told the magazine publishers, "We don't actually want you to be successful...the fundamental way to increase your rank is to increase your relevance."

Branding and relevance. Hmm. Could it be that proving your content to be relevant  could increase the credibility of your brand, or "the authority" perhaps? Would it be safe to say that reader engagement is a reflection of relevancy as well? If more people become involved in a discussion, is that not a sign that it is more relevant? This sounds familiar.

OK, I'll come right out and say it (yes, I'm going to bring up Bankaholic yet again). Take Bankaholic, the financial blog that was just sold to Bankrate for $15 million. Part of the reason Bankrate bought it was because it ranked well in search engines for hot key words the company was going after.

Johns Wu, the guy that sold the blog has acknowledged that user engagement was a huge factor in its success. It's obviously relevant if it's creating a good amount of discussion. And it's ranking well. The name Bankaholic works as a pretty solid brand as well (some have speculated that this was also another factor of the purchase).

Schmidt is absolutely right. The Internet is a Cesspool of garbage, and relevancy and brands are the way to filter out what's good. It's no different than it's ever been. Think about classic print publications. You've got trusted magazines and sleazy tabloids. You were always taught not to believe everything you read. The same principle applies online, it's just that the amount of content is much greater (on both sides of the spectrum).

When discussion is taking place, relevancy is easier to pick out, and brands represent authority. Authority and engagement. Those are the keys to success, and that is the reason why new media is still a legitimate source of information despite people gaming the system to try and take advantage of it in unethical ways.

It Doesn't Stop with Content Sites


Let's look at the concept from a broader business standpoint, because these principles don't only apply to content sites. They also apply to eCommerce businesses or even the web aspects of traditional brick and mortar businesses. I don't care if your site only leads to selling products on eBay or Amazon, you must have ways of establishing your authority, which creates trust with potential customers. A blog or even “expert articles” that give tips and advice can be a good way to accomplish this. When a customer senses that the people running a site know what they're talking about, they are more likely to purchase products from that site.


You can use blogs to engage site visitors and you can also integrate Web 2.0 type apps. For example, Best Buy has just launched an "enterprise-Twitter"-style application called Mix aimed at employees. Similar tools can be available for customers that will create an interactive environment that helps build a bond with customers, often prior to the sale. Anything that can help you develop a dialogue with your potential customers is going to help inspire trust.

A recent survey found that 81% of consumers don't trust small online businesses. Authority and engagement are ways to overcome this. For more on earning customer trust online, see my seven steps for small businesses. How do you earn trust from your customers? What methods do you employ to engage users? How do you gain authority in your niche? Share your ideas with the rest of us. Engage!

About the author:
Chris Crum has been a part of the WebProNews team and the iEntry Network of B2B Publications since 2003. Twitter: @CCrum237

The cess pool

I fully agree with you that the quality of content is on the decline as many people are entering the market hoping to get rich quick.  The great thing about the system is that poorly managed sites will typically not get much traffic, and therefore the people clogging the arteries will quickly lose interest.

As for content, I feel that blogs are without a doubt the best way to get high quality information as they typically encompass a small niche.

As a journeyman online

As a journeyman online marketing specialist, I've been reading WebProNews since it's inception. I gotta say here - people take off the blinders.

My experience with Google is that it remains the most unethical, double standard, peddler of false propaganda out there. On one hand it says "we are not evil", on the other it is structuring internal government archives and affairs and sharing data with the most sinister big brother movement one can find. All the while scamming the investment community into the most absurd profit versus earning ratios that have set new realms of lunacy for stock valuations versus common sense. (Note to Google: be happy your adoption rate outweighed the negative churn rate for dissatisfied clients for so long!).

On another it is stressing neutral kindness to all political wise - while it greases the Democratic wheel for $500k to $1m in return for preferential billing (in ridiculous amounts) for letting our government use it's simple archive and indexing methodologies to improve "our lives"

With respects to their cesspool comments - their disease goes one step further if you want to see an example for yourself. My last battle with them (ironically on behalf of a US Government entity) they refused to let words related to combat offer up training and battalion regiment information that was saving lives behind the scenes.

BUT - (no pun intended) they stood on their high horse and yelled why they should be allowed to get paid for a word like "scat" by advertisers. A fairly unknown (but highly profitable looking at search intel of past) fetish involving appeties for fecal matter. Check for yourself..... then scratch your head in disbelief and ask yourselves "what is wrong with these people".

I hope that the editors here do not censor this, and some level of common sense and accountability can be re-rendered into society. Personally I grow sick of the hooligans who are running this country, manipulating consumer attitudes, and controlling free press and accountability.

 

- American Conscience

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info