Thats what happens when you dont live in a free country!
A Russian blogger who referred to local police as "scum" in a post received a suspended jail sentence on Monday for extremism, leading other bloggers to express concern over online free speech.
Savva Terentiev, a 28-year-old musician from Syktyvkar, 940 miles north of Moscow, wrote a post that suggested the police should be dealt with by burning officers two times a day in a town square.
He was convicted for "inciting hatred or enmity," and given a one-year suspended sentence. Free speech advocates fear the ruling could set a bad precedent for free speech online.
"This was an absolutely unjustified verdict," Alexander Verkhovsky, director of the SOVA centre in Moscow, a non-governmental group that monitors extremism, told Reuters. "Savva for sure wrote a rude comment ... but this verdict means it will be impossible to make rude comments about anybody."
The blog post that led to his prosecution has been taken down. A Russian newspaper quoted him as writing in the post,"Those who become cops are scum," and said police officers should be put on a bonfire.
During his prosecution Terentiev wrote an open letter to Russian President Dimitry Medvedev proclaiming his innocence.
"It is our duty to take responsibility for words on the Internet but ... I did not call for the inflaming of social hatred towards the employees of the police department," he wrote in the letter posted on his blog.
Publish A Comment
| Popular WPN Business Resources |
-

Goodbye Vista, Hello Windows 7
Microsoft released its latest edition of Windows on October 22nd to... -

Social Media Trends That Indicate the Future
Where are we going with social media? That question is asked very... -

Time to Get Serious about Social Media
According to Chris Brogan, the President of New Marketing Labs, we...
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising





















The Limits of Free Speech
Well I guess this is a pretty "hot" topic these days and everyone has their own opinion.
I'm not sure what the rule should be, but I think there's a difference between public and private speech and a line to drawn about inciting hatred - replacing the subject matter with a different subject matter should give a clue - for instance, would it be acceptable to the author to replace the word "police" with "Russian" or in my case "Englishman" - or for others "Muslim" or "Christian" etc.
However, this gets grey in the area of humour - reference the Monty Python work "The Life of Brian" which was pretty offensive to many Christians at the time, but accepted as a work of comedy by most...