Subscribe to our RSS feed!
Popular » Botched Debate AdWords Case Funny Death By Blogging Wikipedia Rant Craigslist Money Link Bartering

Wikipedia Sued For Libel


Case likely to be thrown out

A literary agent is suing the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikipedia contributors for negative comments, but Wikimedia says it's not liable for user-generated content.

Barbara Bauer filed a lawsuit in New Jersey Superior Court alleging that the Wikimedia Foundation is liable for postings that called her one of the "Dumbest of the twenty worst" agents, who has "no documented sales at all."

Wikimedia filed for a motion to dismiss the case, citing the Communications Decency Act, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and state free speech laws as protecting it from such lawsuits. The federal communications law says that owners and operators of Web sites cannot be held liable for user comments.

Courts have ruled in favor of Web sites in a number of similar cases where they upheld the Communications Decency Act. The courts have ruled that people with complaints of defamation on Web sites should focus on users who make comments and not the Web sites that host the comments.

Eric Goldman, director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University, told MediaPost," There is no doubt that Wikimedia qualifies for (immunity) for any claims based on user submissions or edits to Wikipedia, and I would expect any associated lawsuit against Wikimedia alleging libel to be tossed quickly."

 

Digg This! StumbleUpon This!
AddThis Social Bookmark Widget

About the author:
Mike is a staff writer for WebProNews.

Comments

wow

Thats pretty funny.

GOOD! SUE them dumbasses!

GOOD! SUE them dumbasses! Their moderators are such STUPID morons they can't tie their shoes withought saying, "DDDUUUUHHHHH HOW I DO THAT?" These morons are SOOOOOOOO stupid, they won't let an article be made about a company, saying the company's corporate information is not a valid source, while at the same time saying a company's corporate information is a valid source! I know, see how STUPID Wikipedia morons are?

Surely Wikipedia has minimal

Surely Wikipedia has minimal levels of responsibility in what's on their website. They cannot just have a carte blanch immunity from total libality?

 Of course they do. Didn't

 Of course they do. Didn't you read the item before you posted? and it's "carte blanche" with an "e" at the end, just fyi, and "liability" has another letter in it too. 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info