Trademark lawyers, and that's about itTrademark lawyers have repeatedly tried to make the case that dropping a competitor's trademarked terms in website metatags are a violation of trademark law. A new court decision, though, says otherwise.
The argument has rested on traditional tenets like potential for confusion, trademark dilution, use in commerce, and even product-switching. A new court decision, though, doesn't let those arguments go forward until the plaintiff can prove keyword metatags count for anything at all.
Since search engines virtually ignore keyword tags, it's hard to make an argument that trademark use in the tags do any real damage at all.
"SEOs and SEMs have known for years that most search engines ignore or give minimal acknowledgement to keyword metatags," writes Technology and Marketing Law blawger Eric Goldman, who hips us to the case. "Lawyers, on the other hand, have been living in a parallel fantasy universe where keyword metatags single-handedly divert unwaveringly brand-loyal customers to piratical competitors."
About the author:
Jason Lee Miller is a WebProNews editor and writer covering business and technology.
Comments
amazing
For something that does not matter, people sure make a big deal over it and waste the tax payers money and the courts time.
The fact that the keyword
The fact that the keyword meta tag is useless shouldn't make a difference. A trademark is a trademark, so surely it shouldn't be used at all. For anything. Ever.
Thank you, your honor
this is outrages, maybe soon we will have to avoid using every bit of a phrase that sounds like a company or a trade mark.
Post new comment