Visit Twellow.com
Popular » Can't Buy The Top Copycat Spammers Online Obstacles Crimes On YouTube eBay Fair Trade eBay Feedback
Directory Listings » Blogs Conferences Forums Software Tutorials Submit Site

Economy Concerns A Boon For Online Ads


Less to spend means advertisers will spend smarter

An economy that has been buffeted by soaring energy prices and inflated costs of goods may have the side effect of bolstering digital advertising.

When filling up even a modest four-door sedan consumes a noticeable chunk of one's take-home pay, people look for better deals elsewhere to compensate. A similar phenomenon could be happening with online ads.

As budget-makers plan where to spend money, they may opt for more measurable, and cost-effective, online ads. Silicon Alley Insider said discussions at the McGraw-Hill Media Summit hit some optimistic tones amid the current economic gloom:

"A recession is great; it's going to force people into digital and accelerate the pay-per transaction model," said Marc Ruxin, SVP for digital at McCann Worldwide.

Also in that camp: Dean Carignan, director of ad business strategy at Microsoft (MSFT), who says a recession will hit brand advertisers, which account for 30% of Web spending, but not direct-response advertising, which accounts for 70%.

Not everyone cheered for a recession. Analyst Scott Kessler of Standard & Poors sees 2008 having slower growth than predicted, likely 19 percent rather than an estimated 21 percent due to impact from the economy.

We're inclined to think the combination of the current economy and ongoing worries about the pay per click model will push more advertisers to opt for cost-per-action models where they pay for specific conversions. That may not bode well for companies earning big from pay-per-click, but the time seems ripe for a shift.

Digg This! StumbleUpon This!
AddThis Social Bookmark Widget

News Tags: Advertising, Internet
About the author:
David Utter is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business. Follow me on Twitter, and you can reach me via email at dutter @ webpronews dot com. Why not Mixx this article while you're here?

Comments

Advertisers to opt for cost-per-action models

Brad Francis (CEO ShoppingTrader.com)

The dilemma here is that who sets the price for model? 

Brad Francis (CEO ShoppingTrader.com)  stated   "I agree, it is a very interesting debate.  However its my belief that the "cost-per-action model"  will definetely come out on top over the next year.   Most advertisers agree that a cost-per-action model, where they only pay for specific conversions, is preferred and certainly a way to reduce their fixed overheads.   Yet as advertisers opt for pay-per transaction model, we should not forget, that the advertising cost for those pay-per transaction models will indeed rise.   The dilemma here is that,  who sets the price for model  -  the Advertisers or the Googles in this new world?"   In the past the Advertiser does and the Provider then decides whether or not they are prepared to run the Ad campaign.   Taking this to the extreme - it sounds like Affiliate Marketing may be on rise.

There is no doubt that this pay-per transaction model, will certainly lead to fierce competition also, which may allow  the smaller to middle players to obtain increased revenues.

Interesting times ahead indeed.

Brad Francis
CEO ShoppingTrader.com

 

Does measurability get you cut?

This is an interesting debate.

I am not completely convinced that reality is not counterintuitive in a rapidly changing market. I tried to dig into this debate a bit too on Lead Marketwatch.

I am a bit inclined to begin embracing Niki Scevak's argument at Bronte Media.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.