iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
1 commentMonday, March 3, 2008

SEO Evil? Not To Vanessa Fox

Search optimization received demonization, justification
Erstwhile Google Webmaster Central product manager Vanessa Fox reached back six months to discuss a perception about her famed former employer and search optimization.

These days we usually find Vanessa Fox posting at Search Engine Land or causing trouble for Rand Fishkin. She stepped back in time a little to address a chat-worthy post by Alex Bosworth, and his complaints about Google and SEO.

"I do think it’s still the case that many people don’t think of SEO as part of marketing," Fox said in describing why it got her attention. "They think of it as a necessary evil rather than part of a larger strategy."

"If you want a huge amount of traffic, the way to get it is not through community features, it is not through great writing and content development, but it is through optimizing the crap out of your site so that Google will send more and more searchers your way," Bosworth complained. That missed the point, according to Fox:

Yes, most people on the internet find sites through searching. So, yes, you can get a lot of traffic if you rank highly for relevant keywords. But traffic alone is meaningless. You have to look at traffic + engagement. Traffic + bounce rate. Unless your entire goal with the site is to monetize through CPM-based ads on the home page, your site needs to be compelling to the searchers who land there so that they’ll stay.

In other words, if you abandon great writing and content development, if you neglect the question of how to make the site better to use, you are simply being short-sighted and are ignoring all the rules of marketing. That’s not Google’s fault. That’s your own fault for not looking at the right metrics.

As far as complaining is concerned, Fox expressed some confusion over just what had Bosworth so upset:

“And your user community might even die, but who cares, comparatively they are a tiny minority of your overall user base. You’re too busy dealing with scaling your servers to cope with the millions of hits coming from Google to care about those ten thousand monthly visits from loyal users.”

He’s complaining that Google is sending him too much traffic and thus it’s somehow Google’s fault that he’s chosen to ignore audience engagement? It’s completely baffling to me.

Search optimization can help people find their targeted audience. But site publishers should worry more about the quality of what they have to offer their visitors, in Fox's opinion.

"You wouldn’t open your paint store with no sign and a broken door in a back alley that had a brick wall blocking the road. Why would you do the same on the internet and then blame Google?" she said.

News Tags: Search, Google, Vanessa Fox, SEO

Ok but there is something missing

Hey David,

As usual I agree with you, and that is why, as a general rule I never write. Or used not to write. (The other reason is that my english is very bad, I am spanish and I am writing from Madrid). But I have my own theory about these matters, and I would like to share it.

At least in Spanish, there is a 100 % confusion about two words: position and positioning. About 10 years ago, nobody doubted about the marketing meaning of both. But right now, positioning seams to have 100 % change its meaning in Marketing. Let's see. 10 years ago, if you spoke about positioning, you were talking about "the place a company, a brand, a product or a service situates in the customers mind in relationship with their competitors". Right now, positioning is almost 100 % related to SEO (at least in Spain) and that is wrong!. Let's speak clear: we must say "position in Google", f,i. but not "positioning in Google". It means different things.

Perhaps you could think I am old fashion, but what is clear (at least in spanish) that the same word cannot mean two so different things in marketing

Héctor

WOW

That is crazy.. he can always send some traffic my way.. Ungratefull is what I would call it.

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info