Visit Twellow.com
Popular » Can't Buy The Top Copycat Spammers Online Obstacles Crimes On YouTube eBay Fair Trade eBay Feedback
Directory Listings » Blogs Conferences Forums Software Tutorials Submit Site

Google Offers Reprieve From Google Hell


The four-year experiment is over.

Webmasters can stop fretting about Google's supplemental results – they're not really there anymore. Google has lifted the veil between indices.

Google introduced its supplemental results in 2003, much to the chagrin of webmasters actively looking to have more of their content indexed for search. In what the company then called "a new Google experiment," a pair of indexes were created, one for the search engine's main results, and a second for more obscure queries.

And then four years of confusion ensued – at least for webmasters. The new index appeared to be "where Google puts the trash."

Though Google repeatedly said that webpages placed in the supplemental index were not placed there because of some kind of penalty, webmasters quickly realized how badly their search traffic suffered.

Though not an outright penalty, voices from inside Google suggested that pages in the supplemental index often had certain things in common: few or no quality backlinks, orphaned pages, URLs with too many parameters, low PageRank, duplicate content, et cetera.

Pages in the supplemental index were not crawled as often, and not returned in the main results unless not enough results were found for a query. Thus, a new SEO focus was on how to get one's pages out of "Google Hell" and into the main search results.

Back in July of this year, Google stopped labeling them as "supplemental results" as such a label implied that the results were inferior. The crew was in the process of overhauling the system to provide deeper and more continuous indexing with fewer restrictions and a greater ability to handle URLs with more parameters.

This was the first real signal that the supplemental index was on its last legs, as engineers noted that "the distinction between the main and the supplemental index is therefore continuing to narrow."

Yesterday, even as forums around the net were upset by an apparent increase in the number of pages relegated to the supplemental index, Google's Yonatan Zunger announced that "the elimination of the artificial difference between indices" was complete.

Zunger writes, "rather than searching some part of our index in more depth for obscure queries, we're now searching the whole index for every query.

"From a user perspective, this means that you'll be seeing more relevant documents and a much deeper slice of the web, especially for non-English queries. For webmasters, this means that good-quality pages that were less visible in our index are more likely to come up for queries."

So that's good news. Google will search both indexes for all queries rather than only bringing up supplemental results for difficult queries. Zunger said it took "some truly amazing technical feats," but webmasters no doubt will feel it's four years overdue.
 

Digg This! StumbleUpon This!
AddThis Social Bookmark Widget

About the author:
Jason Lee Miller is a WebProNews editor and writer covering business and technology.

Comments

Natural Animal Healthcare

We are going to early in 2008 revamp our website to make it easier to find products with a search box and an all new shopping cart through PayPal that figures correct shipping cost. Compared to what we have now it will be a very big face lift. We are hoping our clients love it as much as we do. Have a great holliday season, Don Stewart

Tired of chasing Googlebot

I think that for most webmasters its time to stop chasing Google. Google unfortunately has never in my eyes been up front enough to give us a clear indication of what it considers a properly formatted web site that its bot will crawl or what it expects in order to index a page. This is truly the case when it comes to ecommerce. What does a cat have to do to get a decent pagerank in order to be competitive. Personally in my view its smart on their part to ignore sites selling wares because it means that retailers have to advertise to get traffic. Its wrong but smart. Earlier this year it grayed out more than half of the pages on my site. On some of the pages I was selling manuals which at the time could not be found on the net. Since then others have bought them and reprinted them but thats another story. This was original content yet googlebot would not index the pages recently I have noticed that the pages are showing up on the serps but they are still gray. What does that mean?? Google is a Public entity and a leader in the search engine market and I feel that as citizens, users, clients and shareholders in some cases it is time to find another company to patronize. Although successful Google does not live up to the hype. Yahoo is sounding better every day and I actually get a fair bit of traffic from them. Enough crying all I am asking for is a clear owners manual Google can you provide that????
Obazaar - your Online marketplace

Guys, Google is the new

Guys, Google is the new Microsoft. It is time to shift the battle! They have too much power and that's bad. Google owns you! Google is evil. Google should be your slave, not the other way around. Microsoft's evilness is nothing compared to this monster. Webmasters, programmers, quit whining about Microsoft and start fighting this monster. Start supporting more Yahoo, Microsoft, ask.com to level the playing field. Write more articles supporting those engines or something!

Toto

Whoopee

Now can someone do something about removing ridiculous penalties that are impossible to determine the root cause of.

google suplemental index pages (f.e. chapewerken )

I' have seen de results for "chapewerken" being reduced from 10.350 to little over 4.000

re:Not So Sure

Tend to agree Jaan. I'm not seeing a whole lt to lead me to believe, that as far as the searcher is concerned, much has changed in regards to what they are delivered for their queries. Personally, I'm still seeing longtail queries where there's less than a page of relevant exact phase matches not showing up for a general search. Additionaly, when using the site: operator, there's still a clear delineation between te pages that "were in the RI" and "were in the SI".

Another Google Fairy Tail?

I have reasons to have doubts about that. One of them is: I was checking some sites searching with /* which was actually quite cool. If supplemental results have disappeared, you would expect it to return the same number of pages as the search query without /*. Right? But that doesn't happen! Is the probably another Fairy Tail?

Google 4 year hell

GOOGLE SUCKS! Why anyone still uses this over-rated search engine is beyond me. They invade people's privacy, they penalize adsense users for no reason, and people with good websites never get seen. Why is everyone so GA GA over Google? Brainwashing that's why! Yahoo is a far better search engine with much more relevant results. IXquick is better as well and they don't invade your privacy. And one that few people know about is Clusty. This one breaks things down and clusters them into relevant results. Don't feed the Google behemoth! Four year Google hell? Google can go to hell for all I care!

not so sure

So we should consider the SI as gone or non-existent correct? Should we even look at those inaccurate SI or pages indexed operators ever again? Are all pages being judged equally right now? Is this why many websites have been seeing the total number of pages indexed going down when checking the site: operator?

Cheers supps!

This is very funny when looking back at all the huff search marketers and webmasters made when they removed the supplemental label from search results. They can all take a deep breath and sigh in relief now :)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.