iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
6 commentsWednesday, December 19, 2007

Gambling Ads Cost Search Engines In Court

Feds save America from online wagering

Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft all settled charges with the US Attorney's office in St. Louis over their display of gambling ads online.

The trio of major Internet players got slapped for permitting ads for gambling to appear in their advertising networks. They will pay $31.5 million collectively to settle charges with the federal government.

A KMOV report said Yahoo, Microsoft, and Google took ads for sports wagering and other online gambling. Unlike places like Canada and the UK, Internet gambling is a federal offense in the US, horse betting being the only exception.

The report said none of the three companies will have to admit wrongdoing. They will, however, fork over millions to the feds, and in the case of Microsoft and Yahoo, pay additional penalties:

Microsoft agreed to pay 4.5 million dollars, to provide 7.5 million dollars to the International Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and to provide 9 million dollars in public service advertising.

Yahoo forfeits 3 million dollars and will provide 4.5 million dollars in public service ads.

Google agrees to pay 3 million dollars.

US law about online gambling has been a sticking point outside the country. The World Trade Organization considers the restriction illegal, and several countries have sought redress over it.

 

It's a sticking point in the U.S. as well

The whole story about how this horrendous law came to pass is a terrible testimony to the state of U.S. politics. Not only does it violate treaties we have made with other countries, it also violates the civil right of every U.S. citizen to spend their own money in ways of their choosing. I believe we have entered an age when multinational corporations have no reason to respect intra-national laws. If civil rights is to survive it will have to be because enough people worldwide demand them. We can start with the U.S. surreptitious gambling laws.

Right!

Allen, you are so right. I look further into this and similar issues, and do not like what I see. The problem with repealing this (or any other law) that the people do not want is that overturning it makes the authors and supporters look bad. And they fear to look bad before a small and very vocal minority. I think of them as "the church grannies". Looking bad makes them open for attack in the polls. In other words, the will of the people is subservient to the vanity and private political aspirations of a small group of (mostly) men without the courage to do their sworn duty... act upon the will of the people they supposedly serve. Just MHO.

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info