iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
CommentWednesday, August 8, 2007

Fred Thompson's Webmaster Doesn't Know Dmoz

The potential Presidential candidate's campaign doesn't know why a Google listing for his official website has a description they didn't write. We know what happened.
Fred Thompson's Webmaster Doesn't Know Dmoz
Fred Thompson's Webmaster Doesn't Know Dmoz
A Knoxville TV station reported the confusion at the Thompson camp over what Google has to say about the candidate's I'm With Fred site:
Type the phrase "Friends of Fred Thompson" into Google, and the first link returned by the search engine describes the Web page as the "Official site of Fred Thompson for President Exploratory Committee."

An exploratory committee would be a major step between Thompson's less formal "testing the waters" committee and an official bid for the Republican nomination for president.

But spokeswoman Linda Rozett called the description inaccurate. Rozett said she doesn't know how the description got on Google.

We're pretty sure we found the reason why, and our readers probably figured it out too. On the Dmoz Open Directory site, take a look at this page about Thompson, particularly the starred entry near the top:
I'm With Fred - Official site of Fred Thompson for President Exploratory Committee.
Google has pulled the description seen in its search results from Dmoz. The 'I'm With Fred' webmaster doesn't seem to know this little bit of HTML-fu, which will help the campaign stop this from happening: <META NAME="ROBOTS" CONTENT="NOODP"> That tag will keep search engine crawlers from using the description on the Dmoz Open Directory. If the candidate is feeling grateful for this help, he can offer me the position of Ambassador to Tropical Places if he is elected.

Updated Description

The ODP description for the Friends of Fred Thompson website has been updated to correct this misunderstanding.

What's the difference?

As was pointed out on the great DraftFredThompson.com Website... there's no difference between an exploratory and testing the waters phase... this is according to the FEC...
http://www.fec.gov/pdf/record/1999/aug99.pdf

Organizing a Testing-the-Waters
Committee
An individual may organize an
“exploratory committee” or “testing-
the-waters committee” for
exploring the feasibility of becoming
a candidate. Such a committee
is not considered a political committee
and does not have to register or
file reports as long as its activities
are limited to testing the waters and
it does not engage in campaigning.
The name of the committee, and
statements by committee staff, must
not refer to the individual as a
candidate. For example, an exploratory
committee could not be called
“Sam Jones for the House,” which
would indicate that Jones had
already decided to run for federal
office. Instead, the committee could
be called “Sam Jones Congressional
Exploratory Committee.”

So I guess this article could be renamed... "WebProNews doesn't know FEC"

FDT 4 POTUS

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info