Isn't it interesting that whenever there is an article that refers to "the many deaths" associated with the use of online pharmacies, writers are forced to use one of only two instances where deaths have been directly linked to buying drugs online.
There is no discussion on how small a proportion of total online pharmacy transacions that this represents. Neither is there any comparison with the data from published studies that have reported an alarmingly high proportion of deaths resulting from the "regular" pharmaceutical supply chain.
It begs the question. "Who is driving this discussion?" Not the many millions who have used online pharmacies and who are happy with the products they have received and the savings they have made! You have to suspect that those who have most to gain from more vigorous control of online pharmacies are encouraging the publication of these poorly researched articles that are so obviously written to generate fear in the minds of consumers.
We have operated an online pharmacy site for over 5 years. We source quality products from all over the world. Many are brand name products made by the same companies and in the same manufacturing facilities as the same products sold in the USA. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that there is a greater potential for conterfeit or sub standard products in Australia, UK, Canada, or Sweden than in the USA. The US does not have a monopoly on quality products! Even in India there are a great many pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities that are world class, and that have been inspected and approved by the US FDA.
My advice would be to read all articles like this one with a great deal of cynicism. By all means weed out the online pharmacies that are dealing in danerous or sub potent products but don't for a minute propose that all online pharmacies outside of North America are dangerous. It is simply not so!
Thankfully Google and the comparison shopping portals referred to in this article are not threatened or bullied by those who seek to force a change in their policies. They deserve everyone's support because their resistance ensures the Internet can continue to be an environment free from political manipulation and big business agendas.
iEntry 10th Anniversary
RSS
Newsletter
Advertising





















Consumer or Business Protection
We operate an online pharmacy (www.MedstoreInternational.com )that sources products from many countries worldwide through a network of licensed bricks and motar pharmacies. We have a Pharmacy Checker accreditation yet we are not able to advertise on Google or get accreditation from HealthPricer because we are not based in North America.
This exactly the result the pharmaceutical industry has working towards for many years. That is, to have influential third party organisations in the online pharmacy 'space' regulate sites to ensure that only certain (controllable) retailers can compete in their most lucrative market - the USA.
Canada has in recent years had many lower priced drugs. However the rising canadian dollar and effective Big Pharma strategies now control and restrict the product supply to Canada. This has seen the Canadian pricing advantage diminish significantly. Now the real savings are further afield. Countries like Australia, New Zealand and even India offer exceptionally high quality products for a fraction of the USA price. www.MedstoreInternational.com searches for these high quality, lower priced products however we are often unable to let US consumers know they are available because of the policies adopted by organizations like Google and Health Pricer.
The Google and Health Pricer policies are not driven by any ability they posess to ensure quality products or processes from the pharmacies they "authorise". They are rather a response to the significant ongoing pressure from the Pharmaceutical Industry on gatekeepers, in all areas of the business, to restrict the access to their highly profitable US market.
How afer all does the location of the bricks and motar pharmacy guarantee product quality? There are a number of North American online pharmacies offering exactly the same products as www.MedstoreInternational.com but at significantly higher prices. We know this because we use exactly the same suppliers. Why therefore shouldn't we be able to advise consumers about these products in the same way as the North American pharmacies selling them? Who is the Google and Health Pricer policy really serving? Certainly not the consumer!
What needs to be understood is the relative power of competing parties in this market. For the operators of www.MedstoreInternational.com the focus of our daily activity is sourcing high quality, low priced pharmaceutical products. We do not have the time or resources to do more than this. The Pharmaceutical Industry on the other hand spends many tens of millions of dollars each year lobbying policy makers and gatekeepers and they would not continue to do so if they were not having some success.