iEntry 10th Anniversary RSS Newsletter Advertising
Join the WebProWorld Forum!
Text: Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size | Print Print Article | Share: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Post to Twitter Post to Facebook
CommentThursday, February 15, 2007

EFF Goes YouTube Ambulance Chasing

If a YouTube user feels one of their videos was an unfair casualty of Viacom's recent war on copyright infringement, the Electronic Frontier Foundation wants to know about it. The nonprofit organization has posted its call to the user-generated disenfranchised on their home YouTube turf.

The EFF posted a video entitled "Were You Caught in the Viacom Takedown?" on the Google-owned video site, referring to the flurry 100,000 videos that were deleted at Viacom's request. Viacom claimed users uploaded the content in violation of copyright law.

There have been reports, as reflected in the video as well as the comments, that some videos were taken down that did not violate any such rights, or at best, Viacom's legal team stretched some of their claims.

Chiefly, the video asks YouTubers if their displaced video was used for parody, comment, criticism, news reporting, or for non-commercial and/or transformative uses of Viacom content. If so, the EFF wants to hear from them.

"We like to make sure copyright law doesn't trump free speech," says the narrator toward the end.

The probable lawsuit against Viacom is presumably part of a larger EFF campaign targeting corporate bullies the organization says are abusing copyright law to silence critics.

Pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly, who sought an injunction against wiki sites and citizen journalists for publishing leaked information about its best-selling Zyprexa drug, was a recent EFF target.

The Discovery Channel, too, has felt the sharp sting of EFF opposition lately for demanding the removal of "SpankMaker" (Warning: hairy men in women's thongs) an online tool for producing parodies of a controversial Discovery Communications marketing campaign. The EFF sent Discovery a letter outlining how use of the images provided was "clearly a non-infringing parody."

"Once again, a business is trying to use false legal claims to chill criticism," said Staff Attorney Corynne McSherry. "Fortunately, more and more, the targets of these kinds of threats are fighting back."





Add to Del.icio.us | Digg | Reddit | Furl


Bookmark WebProNews:

Perhaps so

Point taken, so no worries.

And I have immense respect for the EFF. I've talked to a lot of people that have needed their help.

Just couldn't help but notice the afternoon-TV style of it.

Publish A Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
SEARCH
Popular WPN Business Resources












Subscribe to WebProNews


Send me relevant info