<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Web Directory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/web-directory/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:21:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Google Directory is No More</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/the-google-directory-is-no-more-2011-07</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/the-google-directory-is-no-more-2011-07#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Richardson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deactivated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Directory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=71261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I&#8217;m not sure of the viability of directory submissions as a way of search engine marketing, or optimization for that matter, when Google disbands its products, it&#8217;s news. Thanks to a heads up by Brent Csutoras, we now know &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m not sure of the viability of directory submissions as a way of search engine marketing, or optimization for that matter, when Google disbands its products, it&#8217;s news.  Thanks to a heads up <a href="http://www.brentcsutoras.com/2011/07/20/google-kills-google-directory/">by Brent Csutoras</a>, we now know the Google Directory has gone the way of Wave and Google Video; that is, it&#8217;s gone.</p>
<p>If you try to navigate to the <a href="http://www.google.com/dirhp">Google Directory</a>, you will be greeted with the following message:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Google Directory is no longer available.</p>
<p>We believe that Web Search is the fastest way to find the information you need on the web.</p>
<p>If you prefer to browse a directory of the web, visit the Open Directory Project at dmoz.org</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Again, the viability of directories in relation to marketing is dubious, but if you could get your site into one of these things &#8212; the prominent ones, anyway &#8212; it was worth a shot.  Oh well.  There&#8217;s always <a href="http://www.dmoz.org/">DMOZ</a>, although, I have something of <a href="http://archive.webpronews.com/insiderreports/searchinsider/wpn-49-20040924DMOZIsntOpenAfterAll.html">a history</a> with that particular subject.</p>
<p>Over at Csutoras&#8217; post, he states his preference for <a href="http://botw.org/">Best of the Web directory</a>, which offers a similar level of quality as a DMOZ entry.  The difference being, the BOTW directory charges for listings.  DMOZ, while free, <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=dmoz+won%27t+approve+my+site&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;aq=t&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a#sclient=psy&#038;hl=en&#038;safe=off&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;hs=sEu&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&#038;source=hp&#038;q=dmoz%20won%27t%20list%20my%20site&#038;aq=&#038;aqi=&#038;aql=&#038;oq=&#038;pbx=1&#038;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&#038;fp=86582d5fedad0c80&#038;biw=1680&#038;bih=862&#038;pf=p&#038;pdl=300">has issues of with the approval process</a>.  </p>
<p>Speculation concerning the closing of the Google Directory focuses on lack of use, something <a href="http://searchengineland.com/final-nail-in-the-google-directory-coffin-86505">Barry Schwartz pointed out</a> in a SearchEngineLand post.  He also indicates Google deactivated its directory without much fanfare, and, after a quick glance at the <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/">Google Webmasters blog</a> and the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/">official Google blog</a>, you&#8217;ll see that there&#8217;s no announcement available, which also supports that &#8220;lack of use&#8221; theory.  There&#8217;s also nothing on any of the <a href="http://searchengineland.com/the-big-list-of-search-engines-their-employees-on-twitter-16727">various Twitter accounts</a> for Google employees.</p>
<p>If no one&#8217;s using a product, quietly killing it is indeed an option, although, there isn&#8217;t much of anything Google can do that will remain quiet for long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/the-google-directory-is-no-more-2011-07/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Directories Battle For #1 Spot</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/web-directories-battle-for-1-spot-2008-04</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/web-directories-battle-for-1-spot-2008-04#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Janet Meiners</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOTW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMOZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Directory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=44942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Web directories, especially high quality ones, are coveted links for search engine marketers. The holy grail is a link on <a href="http://www.dmoz.org/" linkindex="84" set="yes">DMOZ</a>, but it&#8217;s pretty much unreachable. I know of someone who took great lengths to become an editor so he could get his site included. A few months later he resigned in frustration.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web directories, especially high quality ones, are coveted links for search engine marketers. The holy grail is a link on <a href="http://www.dmoz.org/" linkindex="84" set="yes">DMOZ</a>, but it&rsquo;s pretty much unreachable. I know of someone who took great lengths to become an editor so he could get his site included. A few months later he resigned in frustration.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMOZ" linkindex="85" set="yes">DMOZ</a> is known to be backlogged and highly political. You stand more chance of getting a link on Wikipedia. Now <a href="http://botw.org/" linkindex="86" set="yes">web directory Best of the Web (BOTW.org) </a>says they are going to compete with DMOZ, starting with <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/best-of-the-web-adds-dmoz-editors-to-directory-team/6666/" linkindex="87" set="yes">hiring over 30 of the directory&rsquo;s top editors</a>.</p>
<p>DMOZ boasts over 79,476 editors but the ones recruited for BOTW were part of the original team that started in the late 90s. BOTW was actually started before DMOZ &#8211; in 1994. The names of the new hires are well known in the directory industry. They even have a nickname &#8211; &ldquo;The Nerd Herd.&rdquo; They&rsquo;re tasked with improving the site and adding new sites and blogs.</p>
<p>Directories are edited by people who look for quality sites and list them by topic. They&rsquo;re not only a resource for people to find sites, but it&rsquo;s a way search engines find new content that is spam-free. And if BOTW can grow into a larger directory, while avoiding a lot of the politics of DMOZ, this is welcomed news.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2008/04/best-of-the-web-aims-to-be-the-next-dmoz.html">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/web-directories-battle-for-1-spot-2008-04/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/15 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 243/274 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 11:22:46 -->
