Andreessen serves on the boards of both eBay and Facebook, and is a chairman of the board of Ning, which he also co-founded. His biggest claim to fame was co-founding Netscape.

Horowitz also has background with Netscape. There he ran several product divisions. He co-founded LoudCloud with Andreessen. This became Opsware, which was later acquired by HP. Horowitz served as vice president and general manager of HP’s Business Technology Organization Unit.

The new firm will focus on investments within the range of $50 thousand to $50 million. The duo also announced its first round of funding at $300 million aimed at entrepreneurs, products, and companies in the tech industry.

"Innovation is thriving despite the current economic climate," says Andreessen. "Ben and I are huge supporters of entrepreneurs and want to help turn today’s sparks of brilliance into the next big thing."

"We see venture investing as a company-specific exercise," says Horowitz. "Therefore, we are looking for the best entrepreneurs and companies regardless of stage."

Andreesen outlines some things they are looking for out of entrepreneurs and companies on his blog. They want motivated entrepreneurs, technical founders, founders that intend to be CEOs, and founders that understand their products.

The firm is looking to invest in categories like consumer Internet, business Internet, mobile software/services, software-powered consumer electronics, infrastructure and apps software, networking, storage, and databases.

The firm is NOT looking to invest in "clean", "green", energy, transportation, life sciences (biotech, drug design, medical devices), nanotech, movie production companies, consumer retail, electric cars, rocket ships, space elevators.

Today, we see exactly why the "get acquired" model is so attractive to start-ups. According to VentureBeat, Glam, an online publisher aimed at women, turned down an acquisition offer worth, wait for it, $1.3 billion!

I heard today that Glam received an acquisition offer of $1.3 billion in the past few days, but is unlikely to take the offer, according a source close to the company. Glam’s investors are unlikely to do so because they see a bigger opportunity for Glam to build a large business for high-end display advertising, the source said.

Here’s the kicker, just this February Glam raised $85 million in capital, bringing its total funding to over $100 million. Glam has yet to make a profit!!!

Sure, it’s selling ads, building optimized sites, and as of today, planning a new video ad network, but it’s reportedly yet to make a profit.

Is it any wonder that start-ups–and VC firms–are enamored with the build it first, find a business model later never strategy?

Comments

Today, we see exactly why the "get acquired" model is so attractive to start-ups. According to VentureBeat, Glam, an online publisher aimed at women, turned down an acquisition offer worth, wait for it, $1.3 billion!

I heard today that Glam received an acquisition offer of $1.3 billion in the past few days, but is unlikely to take the offer, according a source close to the company. Glam’s investors are unlikely to do so because they see a bigger opportunity for Glam to build a large business for high-end display advertising, the source said.

Here’s the kicker, just this February Glam raised $85 million in capital, bringing its total funding to over $100 million. Glam has yet to make a profit!!!

Sure, it’s selling ads, building optimized sites, and as of today, planning a new video ad network, but it’s reportedly yet to make a profit.

Is it any wonder that start-ups–and VC firms–are enamored with the build it first, find a business model later never strategy?

Comments

Today, we see exactly why the "get acquired" model is so attractive to start-ups. According to VentureBeat, Glam, an online publisher aimed at women, turned down an acquisition offer worth, wait for it, $1.3 billion!

I heard today that Glam received an acquisition offer of $1.3 billion in the past few days, but is unlikely to take the offer, according a source close to the company. Glam’s investors are unlikely to do so because they see a bigger opportunity for Glam to build a large business for high-end display advertising, the source said.

Here’s the kicker, just this February Glam raised $85 million in capital, bringing its total funding to over $100 million. Glam has yet to make a profit!!!

Sure, it’s selling ads, building optimized sites, and as of today, planning a new video ad network, but it’s reportedly yet to make a profit.

Is it any wonder that start-ups–and VC firms–are enamored with the build it first, find a business model later never strategy?

Comments

Today, we see exactly why the "get acquired" model is so attractive to start-ups. According to VentureBeat, Glam, an online publisher aimed at women, turned down an acquisition offer worth, wait for it, $1.3 billion!

I heard today that Glam received an acquisition offer of $1.3 billion in the past few days, but is unlikely to take the offer, according a source close to the company. Glam’s investors are unlikely to do so because they see a bigger opportunity for Glam to build a large business for high-end display advertising, the source said.

Here’s the kicker, just this February Glam raised $85 million in capital, bringing its total funding to over $100 million. Glam has yet to make a profit!!!

Sure, it’s selling ads, building optimized sites, and as of today, planning a new video ad network, but it’s reportedly yet to make a profit.

Is it any wonder that start-ups–and VC firms–are enamored with the build it first, find a business model later never strategy?

Comments