<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Twitterquette</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/twitterquette/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter + Etiquette = Twitterquette?</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/twitter-etiquette-twitterquette-2007-09</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/twitter-etiquette-twitterquette-2007-09#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Etiquette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitterquette]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=40620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm not an early adopter. I'm not even, necessarily, a late adopter. When pagers were en vogue I eyed them as suspiciously as I would electronic leashes. It wasn't until after living in Japan that I learned mobile phones had some worth &#8211; just because I sort of had to have one there. I'm an observer, not an adopter. <br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not an early adopter. I&#8217;m not even, necessarily, a late adopter. When pagers were en vogue I eyed them as suspiciously as I would electronic leashes. It wasn&#8217;t until after living in Japan that I learned mobile phones had some worth &ndash; just because I sort of had to have one there. I&#8217;m an observer, not an adopter. <br />
<span id="more-40620"></span> <br />
So I&#8217;ve watched with some enthusiasm this Twitter development as the early adopters give it a shot. Initially, I couldn&#8217;t wrap my head around the idea. Who wants to listen to somebody else&#8217;s shorthand stream of consciousness? My own stream is winding and confusing enough. </p>
<p>And there&#8217;s subscribing or &quot;following&quot; involved, two words I&#8217;ve never liked, the first one involving a process of commitment to another&#8217;s ideas, and the second the relinquishing of my self-sovereignty (I don&#8217;t expect others to follow, just expect me to follow me, however awry I lead myself). </p>
<p>Despite my misgivings, people have used the thing in some pretty interesting ways. <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/08/06/childbirth-2-0-have-blackberry-will-twitter">Twittering the birth</a> of a child was one of those ways. There&#8217;s also the Twitter rumor mill. And the <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/04/20/pc-mag-may-boycott-edelman-pr">Twitter foot-in-mouth</a> syndrome. </p>
<p>But who knew there was Twitter etiquette? Robert Scoble, who&#8217;s been at the heart of at least one <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/08/13/is-scoble-over-blogging">Twitterversy</a> in the past, is pleased to let readers know that when it comes to Twitterquette, he&#8217;s a savage. </p>
<p>Scoble outlines <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/09/23/the-10-rules-of-twitter-and-how-i-break-every-one/">10 Twitter commandments</a> he breaks, from sending more than 140 characters to Tweeting more than five times a day. But my personal favorite is Rule 9:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>If other people are telling you you&rsquo;re spamming, you should listen to them. Me? I tell them to screw off. Why? Because if I&rsquo;m being too noisy then there&rsquo;s a little button called &ldquo;unfollow.&rdquo; Why should I change my behavior to suit others? Many other people tell me they like my noisy behavior. One thing I like about Twitter is that you don&rsquo;t need to follow people you think are jerks.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, well, as long as we resist the temptation to worry that our offline behavior will one day mirror our online behavior (I&#8217;m a little sensitive to this temptation, having recently been e-lynched by a swarm of teenagers in the comments section because they didn&#8217;t like what I said &ndash; or didn&#8217;t really say &ndash; about their favorite rock band), then I suppose being a noisy Twitter jerk won&#8217;t be much of real problem.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/twitter-etiquette-twitterquette-2007-09/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 196/209 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 18:25:02 -->
