<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Tancer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/tancer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Keywords: What&#8217;s Cheap and What&#8217;s Discounted</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/keywords-whats-cheap-and-whats-discounted-2007-08</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/keywords-whats-cheap-and-whats-discounted-2007-08#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word pairings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=40088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago we were intrigued by a selection of what Hitwise's Sandra Hanchard called &#34;search value determinants,&#34; or word pairings used in search with regard to modifiers like &#34;price&#34; and &#34;cheap,&#34; et cetera.<br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago we were intrigued by a selection of what Hitwise&#8217;s Sandra Hanchard called &quot;search value determinants,&quot; or word pairings used in search with regard to modifiers like &quot;price&quot; and &quot;cheap,&quot; et cetera.<br />
<span id="more-40088"></span> <br />
<a href="http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/2007/08/03/the-language-of-search-marketing">Sandra&#8217;s examination</a> focused on the Asia Pacific region, but <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2007/08/post_1.html">Bill Tancer</a> has answered our hopes of following up with the same type of analysis for the US. And really, even as difficult as it may be for an Australian and an American to have a comprehensible conversation &ndash; is it a bell pepper or a capsicum? &ndash; Tancer reveals both use the words &quot;discount&quot; and &quot;used&quot; in much the same way. </p>
<p>In the US, people are searching for &quot;discount&quot; tires, furniture, hotels, airfare, auto parts, and shoes, mostly, but want &quot;cheap&quot; tickets, flights, textbooks, and car rentals. </p>
<p>If they&#8217;re looking for &quot;prices&quot; specifically, they&#8217;re specifically looking for gas, gold, cars, stocks, silver, oil, and live stock. But if it&#8217;s a &quot;deal&quot; they want, they want it at the last minute on travel, on cell phones, on hotels, on cruises, and trips to Las Vegas. </p>
<p>Anything &quot;used&quot; is reserved for cars, books, trailers, boats, and auto parts. </p>
<p>But my favorite are the &quot;free&quot; things. Searchers want free music, games, MySpace layouts, ringtones, credit reports, and sex stories. </p>
<p>Sex stories? Really? What, is the guy at the gym, or by the water cooler, or in your fantasy football group charging now to tell of his weekend exploits?&nbsp; </p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/keywords-whats-cheap-and-whats-discounted-2007-08/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SES: Cruising The Search Landscape</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/ses-cruising-the-search-landscape-2007-08</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/ses-cruising-the-search-landscape-2007-08#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SES San Jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=39863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Session talkers at SES San Jose 2007 bounded around the topic of the search landscape: what's popular, and who's the most used among the major players in search.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Session talkers at SES San Jose 2007 bounded around the topic of the search landscape: what&#8217;s popular, and who&#8217;s the most used among the major players in search.</p>
<p><span id="more-39863"></span> <!--sessj07--></p>
<p><em>(Our on-scene WebProNews staff has passed along this latest news from <a href="http://www.searchenginestrategies.com/sew/sj07/index.html" target="_blank">SES San Jose 2007</a>. If you can&#8217;t be there, you need to be here with WebProNews this week, for videos and reports.)</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.searchenginestrategies.com/sew/sj07/btancer.html">Bill Tancer</a> of Hitwise <a href="http://www.ilovedata.com">loves data</a>. They love it so much at Hitwise that the ILoveData.com domain leads straight to their analysts&#8217; blogs.</p>
<p>Among the big search engines, Tancer said Google continues to grow market share. The search leader has been ticking along at a 24.3 percent clip. Yahoo&#8217;s fortunes have improved, with traffic rising since April 2007.</p>
<p>At Microsoft, it&#8217;s a tale of two brands. The Live.com brand has been picking up a little market share, while the MSN Search name is in a small decline.</p>
<p>Tancer provided a look at just how dominant the top three search sites are over the competition. Out of some 1,600 search engines they track, Hitwise found 80 percent of search goes through the top three: Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.searchenginestrategies.com/sew/sj07/jlamberti.html">James Lamberti</a> of comScore Networks had an out of left field suggestion for which site could be the fourth-biggest, if it were measured as a search engine. MySpace has reached a point where it would nudge aside Ask and AOL, both of which round out the top five search engines.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.searchenginestrategies.com/sew/sj07/jstewart.html">Jon Stewart</a> of Nielsen//NetRatings looked at how search market share has become distributed in the US. Google has over half, at 53 percent, while Yahoo gets 20 percent of searches made. Microsoft follows at 14 percent.</p>
<p>He also provided a cautionary suggestions to online retailers. Pushing the conversion too hard, either immediately on arriving or shortly before a purchase, puts a conversion at risk. There should be some time spent on building the brand, with quality content and other efforts, as an investment in retaining a customer.</p>
<p><small></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/ses-cruising-the-search-landscape-2007-08/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK &#8220;How To&#8221; Searches Focus On CVs</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/uk-how-to-searches-focus-on-cvs-2007-08</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/uk-how-to-searches-focus-on-cvs-2007-08#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Caverly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=39625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We used to keep a pretty close eye on Google&#8217;s Zeitgeist; somehow, Hot Trends just isn&#8217;t the same.&#160; <br />
<br />
But Hitwise UK&#8217;s Heather Hopkins has constructed a Zeitgeist-like list of &#8220;how to&#8221; searches, and this is definitely worth checking out.<br />
<br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We used to keep a pretty close eye on Google&rsquo;s Zeitgeist; somehow, Hot Trends just isn&rsquo;t the same.&nbsp; </p>
<p>But Hitwise UK&rsquo;s Heather Hopkins has constructed a Zeitgeist-like list of &ldquo;how to&rdquo; searches, and this is definitely worth checking out.</p>
<p><span id="more-39625"></span></p>
<table width="400" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img width="400" height="200" border="0" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/ukhowto.jpg" cvs="" on="" focus="" searches="" to="" how="" title="UK " alt="UK " class="irImage" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" style="padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 45px; padding-right: 45px;" class="caption">UK &quot;How To&quot; Searches Focus On CVs</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" style="padding-bottom: 0px;" class="caption"><img width="334" height="21" alt="" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/salon/complete.gif" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a title="&quot;How to Write a CV and Other Burning Questions&quot;" href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-hopkins/2007/08/how_to_write_a_cv_and_other_bu.html"> Hopkins</a> begins by noting that there are differences between US and UK search habits.&nbsp; </p>
<p>For example, her colleague, <a title="&quot;How to Make Out, or Levitate&quot;" href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1647434,00.html">Bill Tancer</a>, found that a lot of Americans are curious about &ldquo;how to tie a tie,&rdquo; while the British apparently aren&rsquo;t; the Brits are more concerned with &ldquo;how to write a cv,&rdquo; or &ldquo;r&eacute;sum&eacute;,&rdquo; as it&rsquo;s more commonly known in the US.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Yet it&rsquo;s interesting that both of these queries are conceivably part of the job search and interview process.</p>
<p>Other UK &ldquo;how to&rdquo;s were much less related to a business environment; &ldquo;how to have sex&rdquo; ranked second, and the similarly sexual &ldquo;how to kiss&rdquo; was number five.</p>
<p>Going off in another direction, &ldquo;how to get a six pack&rdquo; and &ldquo;how to lose weight&rdquo; came in at numbers four and eight, respectively, while the financially oriented &ldquo;how to make money&rdquo; ranked sixth.</p>
<p>Yet Hopkins suspects that these queries are all related, writing, &ldquo;Essentially, we want to become rich . . . and attractive . . . in order to procreate.&rdquo;&nbsp; Sounds reasonable &#8211; that&rsquo;s more or less the Hollywood-ized American (and/or British) dream, right?</p>
<p>Anyway, &ldquo;how to&rdquo; and &ldquo;how to get to&rdquo; were third and tenth on Hopkins&#8217;s list, and I have no idea what British searchers were trying to achieve with those fragmented phrases.&nbsp; As another strange point of interest, Tancer discovered that many Americans are interested in &ldquo;how to levitate.&rdquo;&nbsp; Go figure.</p>
<p>And there you have it; the only remaining &ldquo;how to&rdquo; search from the UK&rsquo;s top ten was &ldquo;how to save a life lyrics,&rdquo; and as Hopkins writes, &ldquo;How to Save a Life&rdquo; is a song by The Fray that was played on episodes of both &quot;<a href="http://www.nbc.com/Scrubs/" title="&quot;Scrubs&quot; Home Page">Scrubs</a>&quot; and &quot;Grey&rsquo;s Anatomy.&quot;</p>
<p>By the way &#8211; I feel compelled to admit that I&rsquo;m among those who&rsquo;ve run a &ldquo;how to tie a tie&rdquo; search.&nbsp; But with my confession comes an explanation: I only wear those decorative nooses every three or so years, and like Google&rsquo;s <a title="Google's Privacy Counsel Campaigns Against Ties" href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/07/25/googles-privacy-counsel-campaigns-against-ties">Peter Fleischer</a> (and Search Engine Land&#8217;s Danny Sullivan), I hate &lsquo;em.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/uk-how-to-searches-focus-on-cvs-2007-08/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Searchers Want The Xbox 360, Preferably Cheap</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/searchers-want-the-xbox-360-preferably-cheap-2007-07</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/searchers-want-the-xbox-360-preferably-cheap-2007-07#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xbox-360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=39429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Queries for Microsoft's gaming console have exceeded those for Nintendo's hard to find competitor, the Wii.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Queries for Microsoft&#8217;s gaming console have exceeded those for Nintendo&#8217;s hard to find competitor, the Wii.<br />
<span id="more-39429"></span><br />
Though the Wii has dominated the Xbox 360 and Sony&#8217;s Playstation 3 since Nintendo launched its new console in November 2006, Microsoft&#8217;s product has finally exceeded the Wii&#8217;s interest with the searching audience.</p>
<p>
That may be due to a combination of issues, said <a href=http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2007/07/xbox_overtakes_wii_as_most_sea.html>Bill Tancer of Hitwise</a>. His assessment of the Xbox 360&#8242;s newfound appeal may be driven by several factors:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>So what is driving the increase in searches for Xbox 360? It appears to be a combination of hype for new games, rumours of a price drop and no doubt some queries about the recent problems.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Such interest could be good news for Microsoft, which would welcome it. Microsoft had to incur a billion-dollar charge to fix defective Xbox 360s.</p>
<p>
&#8220;We often find that Internet searches are a leading indicator and can be predictive of future sales growth,&#8221; said Tancer. Any company likes to find positive sales indicators heading into the holiday season.</p>
<p>
People have been especially interested in a potential Xbox 360 price drop. Tancer said the top phrase searched for along with &#8216;price drop&#8217; over the past four weeks has been the Xbox 360. &#8220;There were 70% more US searches for </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/searchers-want-the-xbox-360-preferably-cheap-2007-07/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search News Flash: People Like Free</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/search-news-flash-people-like-free-2007-06</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/search-news-flash-people-like-free-2007-06#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=38726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Close to four percent of all search queries last week contained the word &#34;free.&#34; Is this an indicator of a plummeting economy? Hitwise's Bill Tancer says it's just how people work. <br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Close to four percent of all search queries last week contained the word &quot;free.&quot; Is this an indicator of a plummeting economy? Hitwise&#8217;s Bill Tancer says it&#8217;s just how people work. <br />
<span id="more-38726"></span> <br />
In a column for <a title="Free Bill Tancer" href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1636270,00.html">Time.com</a>, Tancer reveals insights gleaned from collecting the top 10,000 search queries containing the word &quot;free.&quot;</p>
<p>&nbsp;Don&#8217;t worry, he doesn&#8217;t list all of them there. He does, though, if you like learning the origin of phrases, go into where the phrase &quot;There&#8217;s no such thing as a free lunch&quot; comes from. </p>
<p>The most popular of the free queries were searches for free games, music, and ringtones. Well, that&#8217;s the family friendly version. </p>
<p>The Skinemax version is that most of time, freeloaders are looking for sex, sex stories, sex videos, and sex pics. These may also want to do a search on &quot;free virus protection,&quot; while they&#8217;re at it.</p>
<p>If memory serves, though, free ringtones, games and wallpaper are <a title="dangerous searches" href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/06/04/mcafee-on-search-engine-safety">dangerous queries</a>, too. </p>
<p>As you might expect, free shipping is most popular around the holidays, and free games, chat and movies are more in demand during the lazy summers. </p>
<p>Here are a couple of other idiomatic origins, just for good measure: <br />
<a title="Have your cake and eat it, too" href="http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_board/7/messages/470.html"><br />
You can&#8217;t have your cake and eat it too</a>.</p>
<p><a title="A bird in the hand" href="http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/64950.html">A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush</a>. <br />
&nbsp;</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/search-news-flash-people-like-free-2007-06/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Universal Search Not Universally Good For Google</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/universal-search-not-universally-good-for-google-2007-06</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/universal-search-not-universally-good-for-google-2007-06#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Caverly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=38307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>To some people, the launch of Google Universal Search meant nothing - it&#8217;s a good bet that the release went unnoticed by many.&#160; Yet to others, it was a big deal, and bits and pieces of Google itself seem to have been affected in major, traffic-related ways.<br />
<br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To some people, the launch of Google Universal Search meant nothing &#8211; it&rsquo;s a good bet that the release went unnoticed by many.&nbsp; Yet to others, it was a big deal, and bits and pieces of Google itself seem to have been affected in major, traffic-related ways.</p>
<p><span id="more-38307"></span> Hitwise&rsquo;s <a title="Data On Google's Top Properties, Universal Search" href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2007/06/google_universal_search_video.html">Bill Tancer</a> released a report showing the change in visits to the search engine company&rsquo;s top properties; while some went down, others went up.&nbsp; Google Maps and YouTube were among the lucky ones, showing improvements of 20.34% and 8.26%, respectively.</p>
<p>Search Engine Land&rsquo;s <a title="Google Universal Search Analysis" href="http://searchengineland.com/070608-091826.php">Barry Schwartz</a> explains why.&nbsp; &ldquo;Google Maps saw a 20% increase in traffic because prior to Universal search, Google only displayed map results for a very limited set of queries,&rdquo; he writes.&nbsp; &ldquo;Now, Google Maps results are far more common and take up to three of the seven web search results.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Similarly, &ldquo;Prior [to Google Universal Search], YouTube videos were not shown in Google&rsquo;s web search results.&rdquo;</p>
<p>But other Google properties weren&rsquo;t so lucky; visits to Google Book Search went down 19.44%, and Google News&rsquo;s numbers decreased by 7.84%.&nbsp; As for Google Image Search, Schwartz notes, &ldquo;Image search took a 7.22% dive, most likely because the image one box results were no longer guaranteed to be displayed at the top.&nbsp; Image search results now can be found at the bottom, middle or top of the results.&rdquo;</p>
<p>I think it&rsquo;s likely that most of the world is indifferent to Google Universal Search.&nbsp; But within the Googleplex, certain teams have almost undoubtedly noticed these big changes due to its <a title="Google Releases Universal Search" href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/05/16/google-goes-universal-with-search">launch</a>.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/universal-search-not-universally-good-for-google-2007-06/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Vs. Google, According To Hitwise</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/google-vs-google-according-to-hitwise-2006-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/google-vs-google-according-to-hitwise-2006-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Caverly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebProNews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=33321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hitwise's Bill Tancer conducted a detailed analysis of "Google properties and how they rank amongst themselves in market share of visits," and while the results aren't necessarily shocking, they are interesting.  Google's main search engine is the far-and-away leader of the pack, with a 78.42% share.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitwise&#8217;s Bill Tancer conducted a detailed analysis of &#8220;Google properties and how they rank amongst themselves in market share of visits,&#8221; and while the results aren&#8217;t necessarily shocking, they are interesting.  Google&#8217;s main search engine is the far-and-away leader of the pack, with a 78.42% share.</p>
<table width="128" border="0" align="right">
<tr>
<td width="122" height="62"><a href="http://www.webproworld.com"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/CommentImage-4.gif" width="130" height="60" border="0"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p> Google Image Search came next, with 9.20%.  While that share may seem like it suffered from a huge dropoff, it&#8217;s also unavoidable.  <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2006/11/google_properties_the_extended.html" class="bluelink">Tancer</a> included 33 Google properties in his report, and, well, there are only 100 percentage points to go around.</p>
<p><a href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/google-image-search-2nd-only-to-text.html" class="bluelink">Thomas Hawk</a> also viewed Tancer&#8217;s Hitwise statistics, and concluded, &#8220;It&#8217;s amazing to me that Google is not doing a better job with image search given how important a chunk of business that it represents for them.&#8221;  Hawk went on to document his experience with the service; it seems that Google Image Search isn&#8217;t very good at finding pictures of monkeys.</p>
<p>Continuing down the Hitwise list, Gmail fans should be proud that it managed to pull down a share of 5.44%.  Google Video followed with 1.53%, Google News claimed 1.29%, and everything else was at less than 0.80%.  The <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/blogtalk/blogtalk/wpn-58-20061130GoogleAnswersIsClosing.html" class="bluelink">recently deceased</a> Google Answers placed 20th (the rankings were for the week ending November 25), with only a 0.05% share.</p>
<p>That last fact has led to some interesting thoughts.  <a href="http://philbradley.typepad.com/phil_bradleys_weblog/2006/12/google_properti.html" class="bluelink">Phil Bradley</a> writes that it&#8217;s &#8220;interesting to note that Google Answers is at #20, with a bunch of other resources below that, such as Picasa and Groups 2.  Are those going to get canned as well?  I don&#8217;t think so for a moment, but it&#8217;s Friday, which means that idle speculation is allowed.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
Tag: </p>
<p>Add to <a href="http://del.icio.us/post" onclick="window.open('http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&#038;partner=wpn&#038;noui&#038;jump=close&#038;url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+'&#038;title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title),'delicious','toolbar=no,width=700,height=400'); return false;" CLASS="printMailTop"><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/delicious-pic.png border=0> Del.icio.us</a> | <a href="javascript:void window.open('http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&#038;url='+encodeURIComponent(window.location.href)+'&#038;ei=UTF-8','popup','width=520px,height=420px,status=0,location=0,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,left=100,top=50',0)"><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/digg-pic.png border=0> Digg</a>  | <a href="javascript:location.href='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+'&#038;title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)"><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/reddit.png border=0>Reddit</a> | <a href="javascript:location.href='http://www.furl.net/storeIt.jsp?u='+encodeURIComponent(document.location.href)+'&#038;t='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)+' '"><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/furl-pic.png border=0> Furl</a></p>
<p>Bookmark WebProNews: <a href=http://www.webpronews.com><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/wpn-readit.jpg border=0></a> </p>
<p><script language=JavaScript src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/1095/0/vj?z=1&#038;dim=1088&#038;pos=15"></script></p>
<p>Doug is a staff writer for <a href="http://www.webpronews.com">WebProNews</a>. Visit <a href="http://www.webpronews.com">WebProNews</a> for the latest eBusiness news. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/google-vs-google-according-to-hitwise-2006-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Has Long Road To Hoe To Pass Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/google-has-long-road-to-hoe-to-pass-yahoo-2006-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/google-has-long-road-to-hoe-to-pass-yahoo-2006-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=33053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As GOOG climbs above $500 per share, as <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/searchinsider/wpn-49-20051128WillGooglesStockPass500.html" class="bluelink">predicted to happen</a> about this time last year before the great January plunge, questions as to just how high Google can get, in terms of stock, search share, and visits, get more intense. Last week, a Citigroup analyst predicted Google would overtake Yahoo in visits by the end of 2007. Hitwise disagrees.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As GOOG climbs above $500 per share, as <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/searchinsider/wpn-49-20051128WillGooglesStockPass500.html" class="bluelink">predicted to happen</a> about this time last year before the great January plunge, questions as to just how high Google can get, in terms of stock, search share, and visits, get more intense. Last week, a Citigroup analyst predicted Google would overtake Yahoo in visits by the end of 2007. Hitwise disagrees.</p>
<table width="400" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://images1.ientrymail.com/webpronews/112106YahoosLonger.jpg" alt="Google Has Long Road To Hoe To Pass Yahoo" width="400" height="200" border="0" class="irImage" title="Google Has Long Road To Hoe To Pass Yahoo"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" class="caption" style="padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 45px; padding-right: 45px;">Google Hasn&#8217;t Surpassed Yahoo Completely</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" class="caption" style="padding-bottom: 0px;"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/salon/complete.gif" width="334" height="21"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>While Google is the Wall Street darling, with stock projected to rise as high as $750 (some have timidly suggested as high as $840), and with a search market share somewhere between 40 and 60 percent, Hitwise&#8217;s Bill Tancer says that not only will it take longer than a year, but much has to be assumed, lost, and gained to get Google past Yahoo and to the number one online property.</p>
<table width="128" border="0" align="right">
<tr>
<td width="122" height="62"><a href="http://www.webproworld.com/viewtopic.php?t=69845"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/CommentImage-4.gif" width="130" height="60" border="0"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Citigroup&#8217;s <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/google-worlds-most-popular-site/story.aspx?guid=%7B3EE7BF6E%2DB19A%2D4A3C%2D8B05%2D91DAB353233F%7D" class="bluelink">Mark Mahaney</a>, based on numbers provided by comScore projected that Google would overcome a 20-million visitor deficit, supplanting Yahoo as the top spot, if current growth rates continued. </p>
<p>Tancer chewed that over using Hitwise numbers and came to a different conclusion. Though Yahoo&#8217;s market share has dropped by 10 percent in the last year, and Google&#8217;s has risen by 18.6 percent, Tancer estimates it will take three years for Google to catch up with Yahoo. </p>
<table style="border: 1px dashed #CCCCCC; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px;" width="125" border="0" align="left" cellpadding="0">
<tr>
<td>
<div align="center"><a href="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/google_v_yahoo_lrg.gif"><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/google_v_yahoo_thmb.gif" width="125" height="100" border="0"><br /> Click for Larger Image</a> </div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>&#8220;If we apply those growth rates, and assume no material changes in those rates over the next three years (a big assumption), Google would not surpass Yahoo! in market share of visits until mid-2009,&#8221; writes <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2006/11/google_v_yahoo_predicting_the.html" class="bluelink">Tancer</a>. </p>
<p>What will make Yahoo difficult to overcome is how the traffic is spread out among Yahoo properties. A third of Yahoo traffic goes to Yahoo Mail. Another third goes to Yahoo.com, and just under 11 percent are using Yahoo Search. </p>
<p>The traffic dispersed among the top 20 Yahoo properties is double the traffic dispersed among top 20 Google properties. At the top of Google&#8217;s list is, of course, search, gathering 87 percent of Google traffic. The rest are spread out to the hundredths of a percent among all Google properties. </p>
<p>Tag: </p>
<p>Add to <a href="http://del.icio.us/post" onclick="window.open('http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&#038;partner=wpn&#038;noui&#038;jump=clos e&#038;url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+'&#038;title='+encodeURIComponent(docum ent.title),'delicious','toolbar=no,width=700,height=400'); return false;" CLASS="printMailTop"><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/delicious-pic.png border=0> Del.icio.us</a> | <a href="javascript:void window.open('http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&#038;url='+encodeURIComponent(window. location.href)+'&#038;ei=UTF-8','popup','width=520px,height=420px,status=0,locati on=0,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,left=100,top=50',0)"><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/digg-pic.png border=0> Digg</a> | <a href="javascript:location.href='http://reddit.com/submit?url='+encodeURIComp onent(location.href)+'&#038;title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)"><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/reddit.png border=0>Reddit</a> | <a href="javascript:location.href='http://www.furl.net/storeIt.jsp?u='+encodeUR IComponent(document.location.href)+'&#038;t='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)+ ' '"><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/furl-pic.png border=0> Furl</a></p>
<p>Bookmark WebProNews: <a href=http://www.webpronews.com><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/wpn-readit.jpg border=0></a> </p>
<p><script language=JavaScript src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/1095/0/vj?z=1&#038;dim=1088&#038;pos=15"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/google-has-long-road-to-hoe-to-pass-yahoo-2006-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Video Link Swap Spikes Video Traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/google-video-link-swap-spikes-video-traffic-2006-08</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/google-video-link-swap-spikes-video-traffic-2006-08#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=30875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you follow this industry long enough, you know the slightest alteration of any Google offering, from holiday logos to something between Sergey's teeth, gets extensive coverage in the blogosphere. Google swapping out the Froogle link on its homepage for Video was another snoozer.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you follow this industry long enough, you know the slightest alteration of any Google offering, from holiday logos to something between Sergey&#8217;s teeth, gets extensive coverage in the blogosphere. Google swapping out the Froogle link on its homepage for Video was another snoozer.</p>
<p>We made it our <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/insiderreports/searchinsider/wpn-49-20060811GoogleVideoMakesTheHomepage.html" class="bluelink">feature story</a>. Apparently I&#8217;m the only one who didn&#8217;t care. As it turns out, I should&#8217;ve. Hitwise&#8217;s Bill Tancer weighs in today after discovering how promoting Google Video to the homepage transformed somewhere out there into a click frenzy. </p>
<p>Google Video traffic doubled.</p>
<p>&#8220;From another perspective,&#8221; <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2006/08/google_video_what_a_difference.html" class="bluelink">says Tancer</a>. &#8220;I looked at the percentage traffic that Google&#8217;s home page sent to the Video page before and after the link change. The chart below shows that Google Video&#8217;s traffic from the homepage surged from 50% to 70% in a single day.&#8221;</p>
<p>That boosted Google Video up two spots, from 5 to 7, among the company&#8217;s most trafficked services, and busted Froogle down two ranks, from 7 to 5.  </p>
<p>We may see Google Video go higher yet as it becomes what David Utter described as Google&#8217;s &#8220;bigger boat&#8221;:</p>
<p><i>
<div style=margin-left:10px; margin-right:10px>Video has become the big draw online given its growth in usage and popularity. Google&#8217;s deals, networking, and advertising expertise could combine to monetize video at a level no one has approached yet online. </div>
<p></i></p>
<p>Add to <a href="http://del.icio.us/post" onclick="window.open('http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&#038;partner=wpn&#038;noui&#038;jump=close&#038;url='+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+'&#038;title='+encodeURIComponent(document.title),'delicious','toolbar=no,width=700,height=400'); return false;" CLASS="printMailTop"><img src=http://images1.ientrymail.com/webpronews/delicious-pic.png border=0> Del.icio.us</a> | <a href="javascript:void window.open('http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&#038;url='+encodeURIComponent(window.location.href)+'&#038;ei=UTF-8','popup','width=520px,height=420px,status=0,location=0,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,left=100,top=50',0)"><img src=http://images1.ientrymail.com/webpronews/digg-pic.png border=0> Digg</a>  | <a href="javascript:void window.open('http://myweb2.search.yahoo.com/myresults/bookmarklet?t='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)+'&#038;u='+encodeURIComponent(window.location.href),'popup','width=520px,height=420px,status=0,location=0,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,left=100,top=50',0)"><img src=http://images1.ientrymail.com/webpronews/yahoo-pic.png border=0> Yahoo! My Web</a> | <a href="javascript:location.href='http://www.furl.net/storeIt.jsp?u='+encodeURIComponent(document.location.href)+'&#038;t='+encodeURIComponent(document.title)+' '"><img src=http://images1.ientrymail.com/webpronews/furl-pic.png border=0> Furl</a></p>
<p>Bookmark WebProNews: <a href=http://www.webpronews.com><img src=http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/wpn-readit.jpg border=0></a> </p>
<p><script language=JavaScript src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/1095/0/vj?z=1&#038;dim=1088&#038;pos=15"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/google-video-link-swap-spikes-video-traffic-2006-08/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/40 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 603/689 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 02:33:17 -->
