<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Stupid Filter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/stupid-filter/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment Stupidity Filter On Its Way</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/comment-stupidity-filter-on-its-way-2007-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/comment-stupidity-filter-on-its-way-2007-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupid Filter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=41886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So, like, they're working on a program that will filter out stupid comments on the Web. I, for one (smack, smack, smacking on my gum), think that's a great idea. There's a lot of idiots out there terrorizing comments sections all over the net.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, like, they&#8217;re working on a program that will filter out stupid comments on the Web. I, for one (smack, smack, smacking on my gum), think that&#8217;s a great idea. There&#8217;s a lot of idiots out there terrorizing comments sections all over the net.</p>
<p><span id="more-41886"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/sm_body/stupidity_filter_on_its_way.jpg" align="right" border="0" alt="StupidFilter" title="StupidFilter"> Presumably, the <a href="http://stupidfilter.org/main/index.php?n=Main.HomePage">StupidFilter</a> won&#8217;t examine the quality of a commentator&#8217;s logic, but will (perhaps eventually) be able to detect the difference between stupidity and sarcasm. According to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/11/12/100954554/index.htm?postversion=2007110712">USA Today</a>, idiots tend to repeat consonantssssssss rather than vowels, seeeeeeee.</p>
<p>Vowels are ironic, it would seem.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s really neat about the idea is that if a commentator comes in swinging his LOLs and his OMFGs, he can count on getting a swift digital kick. The filter will tell him his comment was &quot;more or less unintelligible&quot; and ask him to try it again.</p>
<p>I wonder if that goes for LOL Katz (or however it&#8217;s spelled), too.</p>
<p>Gabriel Oritz and Paul Starr, the indignant geniuses working on the project, describe it this way:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>The solution we&#8217;re creating is simple: an open-source filter software that can detect rampant stupidity in written English&hellip;. we&#8217;re collecting a ranked corpus of stupid text, gleaned from user comments on public websites and ranked on a five-point scale.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>In the future, the &quot;stupid filter&quot; will available as a Firefox and a WordPress plug-in. <br />
Genius!</p>
<p><center><a href="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41549/0/cc?z=1"><img src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41549/0/vc?z=1&#038;dim=41556" width="336" height="55" border="0"></a></center></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/comment-stupidity-filter-on-its-way-2007-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 187/197 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 19:30:26 -->
