<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; SSL Certificate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/ssl-certificate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:52:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox Tougher On Expired SSL Certificates</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/firefox-tougher-on-expired-ssl-certificates-2008-08</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/firefox-tougher-on-expired-ssl-certificates-2008-08#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSL Certificate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=46708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3, which set a one-day record for downloads recently, has been reconfigured in a way that's setting off alarms for webmasters who haven't renewed their SSL certificates. As the US Army just learned, Firefox won't bring up sites with self-assigned and/or expired certificates. <br /><br />At least, not without some extensive hoop-jumping. <br /><br />If you're a merchant you should know that an SSL certificate encrypts data transmissions between two computers. Credit card information, for example, is protected during transmission between those two computers. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3, which set a one-day record for downloads recently, has been reconfigured in a way that&#8217;s setting off alarms for webmasters who haven&#8217;t renewed their SSL certificates. As the US Army just learned, Firefox won&#8217;t bring up sites with self-assigned and/or expired certificates. </p>
<p>At least, not without some extensive hoop-jumping. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a merchant you should know that an SSL certificate encrypts data transmissions between two computers. Credit card information, for example, is protected during transmission between those two computers. <br /><center><img title="Not Without Extensive Hoop-Jumping" alt="Not Without Extensive Hoop-Jumping" border="0" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/USarmyFail.jpg" /></center><br />But we&#8217;re assuming you know that and that yours is up to date. </p>
<p>If not, your site could be one of the estimated tens of thousands of websites virtually inaccessible via Firefox, the world&#8217;s second-most used Web browser. This isn&#8217;t entirely new to Firefox. Previous versions treated websites with similar issues in a similar way; a pop-up warning not vouching for the site was simple to bypass in a single click. </p>
<p>The new policy, points out <a href="http://royal.pingdom.com/?p=339">Royal Pingdom</a>, presents a message that could be far more frightening to a web surfer. In the case of the US Army&#8217;s website, Firefox 3 labels it as having an invalid security certificate before using the phrase &quot;not trusted.&quot; Users are then invited to add an exception for sites they trust completely. Beneath that is the choice to &quot;Get me out of here!&quot; or to &quot;Add exception.&quot; </p>
<p>Critics believe this process may be a bit too ominous for the average user. &quot;The geeks&quot; at Royal Pingdom write: </p>
<p>Perhaps the error message (and the whole procedure) could have been presented a bit differently to make it easier for inexperienced users to understand, especially now that Firefox is entering the mainstream and is getting a wider user base.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.johnath.com/2008/08/05/ssl-question-corner/">Jonathan Nightingale</a>, who works with Mozilla usability and security issues, defends Firefox&#8217;s treatment of SSL certificates in a lengthy blog post, noting that acquiring one isn&#8217;t expensive and, if you go through Mozilla, it&#8217;s free. </p>
<p>The crowd of webmasters has been quick to jump on Mozilla for this change, which was made in the interest of increased security&mdash;thought to be the biggest advantage over IE&mdash;but it&#8217;s not Mozilla&#8217;s responsibility to make sure webmasters&#8217; SSL certificates are up to date or acquired through proper channels.&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/firefox-tougher-on-expired-ssl-certificates-2008-08/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 196/206 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 17:53:11 -->
