<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Simmons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/simmons/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:32:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Online TV Viewers More Attentive Than Traditional Types</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/online-tv-viewers-more-attentive-than-traditional-types-2008-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/online-tv-viewers-more-attentive-than-traditional-types-2008-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Caverly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simmons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=43116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Lots of people use their televisions to generate background noise; rather few folks seem to use their computers<img align="right" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/television.jpg" alt="Online TV Viewers More Attentive Than Traditional Types" /> for this purpose.&#160; You shouldn't be shocked, then, to discover that viewers of online TV shows are a little more tuned-in than their couch potato counterparts.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of people use their televisions to generate background noise; rather few folks seem to use their computers<img align="right" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/television.jpg" alt="Online TV Viewers More Attentive Than Traditional Types" /> for this purpose.&nbsp; You shouldn&#8217;t be shocked, then, to discover that viewers of online TV shows are a little more tuned-in than their couch potato counterparts.</p>
<p><span id="more-43116"></span>
<p>A Simmons study examined how this trend might affect advertisers.&nbsp; According to <a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/tv-watchers-more-engaged-if-viewing-online-engagement-ad-receptivity-2931/" title="&quot;TV Watchers More Engaged If Viewing Online, Engagement = Ad Receptivity&quot;">MarketingCharts</a>, &quot;Viewers are 47% more engaged in ads shown during TV programs shown online than those shown on programs watched on a TV set . . .&quot;</p>
<p>Also, &quot;People are 18% more engaged with ads in online versions of magazines compared with print versions; they are also 15% more engaged in magazine articles online than in print magazines.&quot;</p>
<p>So even as the American economy does who-knows-what (and fresh <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/jan/07/oil" title="&quot;Speculators bet on $200 a barrel oil&quot;">predictions</a> put oil at $200 per barrel), the Web should continue to receive marketers&#8217; money.&nbsp; Not that this is exactly a new conclusion, but it&#8217;s nice to associate some data with the theory.</p>
<p>In the same sense (and on another subject), the <a href="http://www.smrb.com/" title="Simmons Homepage">Simmons</a> study should provide striking writers with even more reasons to put content online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/online-tv-viewers-more-attentive-than-traditional-types-2008-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 192/203 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 01:15:34 -->
