<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Rudy Giuliani</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/rudy-giuliani/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO and the Presidential Race</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/seo-and-the-presidential-race-2008-01</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/seo-and-the-presidential-race-2008-01#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=43159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With the Presidential primaries well under way, it&#8217;s time for a follow-up to my March 2007 post about <a href="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/03/13/presidential-candidates-seo/" title="how the Presidential candidates rate for SEO">how the Presidential candidates rate for SEO</a>. <br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Presidential primaries well under way, it&rsquo;s time for a follow-up to my March 2007 post about <a href="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2007/03/13/presidential-candidates-seo/" title="how the Presidential candidates rate for SEO">how the Presidential candidates rate for SEO</a>. </p>
<p>Conveniently the same top 3 candidates in both parties are both considered the top 3 candidates, so I&rsquo;m going to stick with the same in my new analysis (Democrats: <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/" title="Barack Obama">Barack Obama</a>, <a href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com/" title="Hillary Clinton">Hillary Clinton</a>, and <a href="http://www.johnedwards.com/" title="John Edwards">John Edwards</a>. </p>
<p><img align="left" style="padding-right: 10px; padding-bottom: 10px;" alt="American Flag Presidential Candidates SEO" src="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/american-flag.gif" id="image153" />Republicans: <a href="http://www.joinrudy2008.com/" title="Rudy Giuliani">Rudy Giuliani</a>, <a href="http://www.mittromney.com/" title="Mitt Romney">Mitt Romney</a>, and <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/" title="John McCain">John McCain</a>). In my previous post I looked at a few points that haven&rsquo;t changed, like age of domain and the choice of domain URL, so refer to that post for that analysis.</p>
<p>This analysis looks at basic SEO metrics and compares data from January 2008 to March 2007. A few new measurements are given following these, including PPC branding and a new metric called <a href="http://www.soloseo.com/tools/indexRank.html" title="IndexRank">IndexRank</a>. And for fun we&rsquo;ll come up with the winners from both parties in terms of their effectiveness in SEO.</p>
<h4>Backlinks</h4>
<p>Backlinks, or inbound links, are how many sites link to your site. </p>
<p>These figures are from Yahoo.</p>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><b>Candidate</b></td>
<td><b>March &lsquo;07</b></td>
<td><b>January &lsquo;08</b></td>
<td><b>% Increase</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Barack Obama</td>
<td>119,909</td>
<td>734,395</td>
<td>612%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Edwards</td>
<td>15,498</td>
<td>581,823</td>
<td>3754%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hillary Clinton</td>
<td>79,219</td>
<td>501,415</td>
<td>632%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rudy Giuliani</td>
<td>38,236</td>
<td>348,025</td>
<td>910%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mitt Romney</td>
<td>39,245</td>
<td>291,470</td>
<td>742%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John McCain</td>
<td>7,428</td>
<td>199,813</td>
<td>2690%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Barack Obama leads in backlinks by about 150,000 backlinks. John Edwards started with having almost 6 times less than Hillary and beats her by 80,000 backlinks.</p>
<p> In the Republican field, John McCain started off with very few (comparatively) backlinks and still ends with 100,000 less than Mitt Romney. Romney leads Rudy by about 50,000 links.</p>
<h4>Technorati Links</h4>
<p>This is used as a measure of popularity in the blogosphere world. The more the better.</p>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><b>Candidate</b></td>
<td><b>March &lsquo;07</b></td>
<td><b>January &lsquo;08</b></td>
<td><b>% Increase</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Barack Obama</td>
<td>6,527</td>
<td>22,662</td>
<td>347%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Edwards</td>
<td>4,952</td>
<td>21,766</td>
<td>440%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hillary Clinton</td>
<td>3,710</td>
<td>20,933</td>
<td>564%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mitt Romney</td>
<td>1,756</td>
<td>11,019</td>
<td>627%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rudy Giuliani</td>
<td>342</td>
<td>8,206</td>
<td>2400%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John McCain</td>
<td>670</td>
<td>6,172</td>
<td>921%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Obama again leads on Technorati links and John Edwards and Clinton keep their same position, with Hillary having the most percentage increase.<br /> Mitt Romney started well ahead of both Rudy and John (2.5 X more and 5 X more respectively) and still leads in Technorati links. Rudy surpasses John McCain with a larger increase in links.</p>
<h4>Alexa Rank</h4>
<p>I know Alexa isn&rsquo;t perfect, but it&rsquo;s an interesting comparison. The lower the number, &ldquo;the better&rdquo;. The number represents the rank of the website out of the top websites on the Internet in terms of traffic. The most visited site on the Internet is ranked 1. A zero (0) means either an error or not enough traffic to rank.</p>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><b>Candidate</b></td>
<td><b>March &lsquo;07</b></td>
<td><b>January &lsquo;08</b></td>
<td><b>Change</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Barack Obama</td>
<td>12,581</td>
<td>17,303</td>
<td>-4,722</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hillary Clinton</td>
<td>18,727</td>
<td>32,729</td>
<td>-14,002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Edwards</td>
<td>33,485</td>
<td>69,182</td>
<td>-35,697</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mitt Romney</td>
<td>129,490</td>
<td>63,734</td>
<td>+65,756</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rudy Giuliani</td>
<td>Not Ranked</td>
<td>92,963</td>
<td>unknown</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John McCain</td>
<td>178,788</td>
<td>99,639</td>
<td>+79,149</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>All of the Democratic candidates have seen a drop in their Alexa Rank since March 2007, with John Edwards taking the worst drop. Barack Obama leads with the best rank.</p>
<p> All of the Republican candidates see a better Alexa ranking, although anything was better than Rudy&rsquo;s rank in March 2007. Mitt Romney leads with the best rank.</p>
<h4>Page Strength</h4>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><b>Candidate</b></td>
<td><b>March &lsquo;07</b></td>
<td><b>January &lsquo;08</b></td>
<td><b>Change</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/johnedwards.com" title="John Edwards">John Edwards</a></td>
<td>6.5/10</td>
<td>8.5/10</td>
<td>+2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/barackobama.com" title="Barack Obama">Barack Obama</a></td>
<td>5/10</td>
<td>8/10</td>
<td>+3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/hillaryclinton.com" title="Hillary Clinton">Hillary Clinton</a></td>
<td>5.5/10</td>
<td>6.5/10</td>
<td>+1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/johnmccain.com" title="John McCain">John McCain</a></td>
<td>3.5/10</td>
<td>7/10</td>
<td>+3.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/mittromney.com" title="Mitt Romney">Mitt Romney</a></td>
<td>4/10</td>
<td>7/10</td>
<td>+3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/page-strength/joinrudy2008.com" title="Rudy Giuliani">Rudy Giuliani</a></td>
<td>3.5/10</td>
<td>6.5/10</td>
<td>+3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>All candidates made significant strides, as would be expected. PageStrength is not a measurement of how good the pages are, but of how well-known, cited, visited, and linked to a site is.</p>
<p> John Edwards has the highest PageStrength while Barack jumped the most, moving from third to second.<br /> John McCain made the most stride but also started as the lowest in PageStrength. Both McCain and Romney end up with the same PageStrength, both beating out Hillary&rsquo;s PageStrength.</p>
<h4>Indexed Pages</h4>
<p>Google and Yahoo both give a different number of pages in their index, so I&rsquo;ll show both, Google/Yahoo.</p>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><b>Candidate</b></td>
<td><b>March &lsquo;07</b></td>
<td><b>January &lsquo;08</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Barack Obama</td>
<td>148/525</td>
<td>302,000/315,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hillary Clinton</td>
<td>387/1133</td>
<td>39,100/19,900</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Edwards</td>
<td>4,230/66</td>
<td>31,700/209,000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rudy Giuliani</td>
<td>91/34</td>
<td>6,400/3,650</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John McCain</td>
<td>457/155</td>
<td>4,940/19,400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mitt Romney</td>
<td>309/157</td>
<td>4,190/4,980</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>These numbers are all over the place, it&rsquo;s hard to say who reports more accurately (Google vs. Yahoo). However, there&rsquo;s no doubt that Obama has created tons of content (probably a lot of user-generated content).</p>
<h4>PPC Branding</h4>
<p>I&rsquo;m not going to recap the PPC from March 2007 because the keywords I looked at were only used by 2 of the candidates. This time I chose to look at the use of PPC for their own name, which I feel is a reflection of their PPC campaign. If you&rsquo;re not running ads for your brand (your name) you&rsquo;re probably not running much of a PPC campaign.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=barack+obama" title="Barack Obama ">Barack Obama</a> &#8211; Ads by Obama and Rudy<br /> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=hillary+clinton" title="Hillary Clinton">Hillary Clinton</a> &#8211; Ad by Rudy<br /> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=john+edwards" title="John Edwards">John Edwards</a> &#8211; Ad by Rudy<br /> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=rudy+giuliani" title="Rudy Giuliani ">Rudy Giuliani</a> &#8211; Ad by Rudy<br /> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=mitt+romney" title="Mitt Romney">Mitt Romney</a> &#8211; Ads by Rudy and Mike Huckabee<br /> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=john+mccain" title="John McCain">John McCain</a> &#8211; Ads by McCain and Rudy</p>
<p>Rudy clearly comes out a winner, but keep in mind this is only a snapshot. If you follow these links at different times of day and different geographical locations you may see very different results. These are coming from the West Coast.</p>
<h4>IndexRank &#8211; a measurement of content freshness</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.soloseo.com/tools/indexRank.html" title="IndexRank">This metric</a> is from 0-10 where 10 is the highest. The higher the number the better the content growth, freshness, and the more indexed the site is by Google.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton &#8211; 8<br /> Barack Obama &#8211; 8<br /> John Edwards &#8211; 5<br /> Mitt Romney &#8211; 9<br /> John McCain &#8211; 8<br /> Rudy Giuliani &#8211; 6</p>
<p>Mitt Romney wins out with a 9 above even the Democrats. Hillary and Obama are both at 8 and John Edwards lags way behind the whole group with a 5. Rudy lags behind the Republican candidates with a 6.</p>
<h4>The Winners</h4>
<p>Back in March 2007 there was no clear SEO winner in either party. After 10 months of campaigning, you can really see a lot of changes in all the candidates, some more than others.</p>
<p>In the Democratic party, Barack Obama clearly trumps both Hillary Clinton and John Edwards in the growth of their site and the pursuit in SEO.</p>
<p>In the Republican party, its not as clear but Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani both have made great strides, but I think Mitt Romney&rsquo;s advantage in traffic, IndexRank, and Technorati links gives him an edge over Giuliani.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.soloseo.com/blog/2008/01/08/seo-presidential-candidates-part-2/#comments" title="Comment on SEO and presidential candidates">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/seo-and-the-presidential-race-2008-01/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Woops: Giuliani&#8217;s Girl Goes For Barack</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/when-candidates-daughters-dont-lock-their-profiles-2007-08</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/when-candidates-daughters-dont-lock-their-profiles-2007-08#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caroline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=39592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you're running for the highest office in the land, it's probably a good idea to check to see what your daughter's doing, if she's going to vote for you, and if not, will she be quiet about it? Wouldn't you double check her social network profiles?<br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re running for the highest office in the land, it&#8217;s probably a good idea to check to see what your daughter&#8217;s doing, if she&#8217;s going to vote for you, and if not, will she be quiet about it? Wouldn&#8217;t you double check her social network profiles?<br />
<span id="more-39592"></span> <br />
<em>What is it with Republican candidate daughters? Bush, Cheney, and now Giuliani. And how come, with such a not-conservative father, Chelsea Clinton seemed stay out of trouble and into the books? Rebellion at its heights? </em></p>
<p><a title="Facebook oops" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2171730">Slate</a> is reporting that former New York City mayor and Republican Presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani&#8217;s daughter, Caroline, just quit the Barack Obama (One Million Strong for Barack) group on Facebook, but only after Slate contacted her to ask what was up. </p>
<p>And, surprise, she&#8217;s not talking to them about it. </p>
<p>A soon-to-be Harvard student, Caroline failed to mark her profile private, and the sleuths at Slate found her out. That&#8217;s too bad for her, and a bit embarrassing for Rudy. She tried to hide it at the last minute, but Slate caught a screen cap denoting her withdrawal from the Barack fan club. </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the first time a child&#8217;s social network profile has made a politician&#8217;s face red. <a title="Ew, seriously?" href="http://wonkette.com/politics/facebook/">Wonkette</a> has a running tally of all the social networking mishaps, including the latest on one of the Bush twins and Jeb Bush, Jr. doing some interesting things with a champagne bottle.&nbsp;</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/when-candidates-daughters-dont-lock-their-profiles-2007-08/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Reporter&#8217;s Arrest Captured On YouTube</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/american-reporters-arrest-captured-on-youtube-2007-06</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/american-reporters-arrest-captured-on-youtube-2007-06#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 20:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Lepacek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=38253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I may have spoken too soon yesterday, lauding the freedom of the press in America, contrasting it with Venezuelan President Chavez' takeover of the airwaves. I didn't speak out of turn, however, when sharing a sincere appreciation for the power of YouTube. <br />
<br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may have spoken too soon yesterday, lauding the freedom of the press in America, contrasting it with Venezuelan President Chavez&#8217; takeover of the airwaves. I didn&#8217;t speak out of turn, however, when sharing a sincere appreciation for the power of YouTube. </p>
<p><span id="more-38253"></span> In case you missed it, <a title="RCTV Gets Around Gov't Oppression" href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/06/05/venezuelan-tv-sticks-it-to-chavez-with-youtube">Venezuelan RCTV</a> is broadcasting on YouTube after being booted by the government &ndash; a testament to the sheer necessity of a site like YouTube for the democratic process. It&#8217;s hard to spin when cold hard evidence is readily present and can be uploaded from anywhere. </p>
<p>United States Presidential hopeful and former mayor of New York City Rudy Giuliani received a rather interestingly timed smiting, perhaps from the Almighty himself last night. Just as he was about to address his Pro-Choice stance and respond to Catholic criticism that he was a Pontius Pilate, lightning struck and cut off his mic. </p>
<p>But something else was going on among the press corps, <a title="reporter arrested for questioning Giuliani" href="http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/050607_reporter_arrested_giuliani_orders.html">according to bloggers</a>. A YouTube video has surfaced showing InfoWars.com&#8217;s Matt Lepacek, who claimed to have proper press credentials at CNN&#8217;s Republican debate, being arrested at the command of Giuliani&#8217;s press secretary after asking a question. </p>
<p>Never mind the question itself. It was a rather audacious query about Giuliani&#8217;s knowledge of a terrorist threat prior to 9/11. And that&#8217;s something we&#8217;d rather not get into here. </p>
<p>But Lepacek&#8217;s arrest brings up some serious questions about freedom of the press, especially since Lepacek is being held on charges of criminal trespassing and espionage. </p>
<p>Yes, espionage. Apparently webcams at debates count for that. </p>
<p>Luckily for those wondering what they&#8217;re not seeing in the mainstream press, there is citizen journalism in the world today, where digital cameras are ever-present. YouTube is making an impact &ndash; a big one. </p>
<p>Hopefully, the big boys in traditional media will jump on this atrocity as an apparently innocent man is sitting in jail on trumped on charges by the New Hampshire police acting on the command of a press secretary. 
</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/american-reporters-arrest-captured-on-youtube-2007-06/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/23 queries in 3.183 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 303/366 objects using memcached

Served from: webpronews.com @ 2012-02-13 11:18:47 -->
