<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebProNews &#187; Player</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/player/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com</link>
	<description>Breaking News in Tech, Search, Social, &#38; Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:38:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Arguing Against NFL In Game Tweets</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/arguing-against-nfl-in-game-tweets-2010-09</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/arguing-against-nfl-in-game-tweets-2010-09#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank Reed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trouble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=55505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I  am a pretty big NFL fan. Have been all of my life. Why? Because the  product is fun for me. The product of football that is. Anything else  about the drama and the thoughts of players is something I see little to  no value in unless there is a personal interest in the player.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  am a pretty big NFL fan. Have been all of my life. Why? Because the  product is fun for me. The product of football that is. Anything else  about the drama and the thoughts of players is something I see little to  no value in unless there is a personal interest in the player. Personal  opinion I know but hey I think we can still have those in the US for at  least today.<a href="http://www.frankthinking.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/no_twitter.jpg"><img width="144" height="144" border="0" align="right" class="alignright size-full wp-image-1536" title="no_twitter" src="http://www.frankthinking.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/no_twitter.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=134462&amp;nid=117990">I read a post last week over at MediaPost</a>  where the author wondered out loud why NFL players aren&rsquo;t allowed to  tweet during games and how terrible that is. I let it go as just being  dumb (though I did comment on the post) but with the NFL season just  around the corner I needed to say something more. Just what you needed,  right? <img class="wp-smiley" alt=";-)" src="http://www.frankthinking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Professional sports leagues focus on the weirdest things  when they start cracking down on misbehavior. For example, the NFL  doesn&rsquo;t seem to particularly mind players abusing steroids (the  punishment for failing a steroid drug test is a four-game suspension &mdash;  basically a slap on the wrist)&hellip; but NFL players who use social media  during a game are liable for a $25,000 fine. This is part of a  communications blackout which decrees players may not use cell phones,  electronic devices, or social media including Twitter or Facebook within  90 minutes of kickoff.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>While I am not going to get into the whole steroids thing  (personally, though, I feel that if a guy wants to shorten his life to  play football a little longer and make more money than he could even  come close to in the real world then so be it) I do have something to  say about people who feel the need to know everything at every moment  and then want to monetize it all.</p>
<p>How about this. When I watch football, I watch the game. Part of the  fun is NOT knowing exactly what is going on in between plays. These guys  do something different than the rest of the world and I like the fact  that some of it remains unknown. I think that not knowing is often  better than knowing. Maybe that&rsquo;s just me.</p>
<p>As for this next statement, this person obviously has never played a  down of organized football in his life because if he did he would know  just how ignorant this sounds.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Maybe someone can explain this policy to me. I can  understand banning some kinds of communication during the time around  games &mdash; specifically, anything which could be used to receive  last-minute tips about the opposing team&rsquo;s plays. But I can&rsquo;t guess what  the NFL hopes to accomplish by preventing players from disseminating  their own content, provided of course it doesn&rsquo;t fall in the category of  game-sensitive information.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Huh? Look I know football is not rocket science. During a game  however you need to concentrate and understand what is happening so you  can make adjustments on the fly. if your offense can&rsquo;t meet because the  QB has to tweet then the game is compromised. It&rsquo;s just a bad idea.</p>
<p>Then there is this one</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The policy strikes me as counter-productive because  allowing players to use social media during games could be a potential  gold mine in terms of driving and tracking viewer engagement. Frankly,  the only time athletes really have anything interesting to say is  probably during the game, when they&rsquo;re sitting on the sidelines talking  amongst themselves &mdash; but the viewer at home usually isn&rsquo;t privy to their  bench chatter (unless they happen to read lips).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Listen people of the social media industry. STOP TRYING TO MONETIZE EVERY SECOND OF EVERY DAY! Please stop! It&rsquo;s just annoying.</p>
<p>So there isn&rsquo;t much else to say. I am a big fan of the NFL and if  there was ever a business that has little trouble making money it&rsquo;s this  one. The last thing we need to do is hear from more guys like Chad  Ochocinco who are as enamored with themselves as many in the social  media industry are. Ol&rsquo; Chad is just that&hellip;..old. His routine is old and  played out. He is a caricature of a celebrity because he has nothing of  value to add to anything so why would we need to hear MORE of his like?</p>
<p>So let&rsquo;s leave the tweets and the like to the in between game realm.  There is plenty of opportunity for something stupid to happen then.  Let&rsquo;s keep the game as the game for the time it is played. It&rsquo;s nice to  actually step away from all the social media stuff and just have fun. Oh  that&rsquo;s right, I forgot, it&rsquo;s not fun these days unless you &ldquo;share&rdquo; it  in some way. Please! No one cares about you or me that much either.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.frankthinking.com/in-game-tweets-for-nfl-this-fan-says-no-way/">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/arguing-against-nfl-in-game-tweets-2010-09/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Announces Flash Player 9 Update</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/adobe-announces-flash-player-9-update-2007-12</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/adobe-announces-flash-player-9-update-2007-12#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brajeshwar Oinam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Flash Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=42362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Adobe today <a title="immediate availability of Flash Player 9 Update 3" href="http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200712/120407adobemoviestar.html">announced</a> the immediate availability of Flash Player 9 Update 3(version number 9.0.115.0), previously code named Moviestar. <br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe today <a title="immediate availability of Flash Player 9 Update 3" href="http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200712/120407adobemoviestar.html">announced</a> the immediate availability of Flash Player 9 Update 3(version number 9.0.115.0), previously code named Moviestar. </p>
<p>Adobe <a title="Adobe Flash Player 9" href="http://www.adobe.com/go/flashplayer/">Flash Player</a> 9 now includes <span class="caps">H.264 </span>standard video support, the same standard deployed in Blu-Ray and HD-DVD high definition video players, and High Efficiency <span class="caps">AAC </span>(HE-AAC) audio capabilities. The latest update also features hardware accelerated, multi-core enhanced, full-screen video playback for high-resolution viewing across major operating systems and browsers.</p>
<p>Tinic Uro has a condensed list of <a title="bugs which have been fixed" href="http://www.kaourantin.net/2007/12/adobe-flash-player-9-update-3-released.html">bugs which have been fixed</a> since the last release version &#8211; 9.0.64.0.</p>
<p>Here is a quick list of the new/enhanced features;</p>
<ul>
<li>New audio/video options with <span class="caps">H.264</span>/HE-AAC codec support</li>
<p></p>
<li>Improved Performance through multi-core support for rendering, hardware scaling in full-screen, multi-threaded video decoding, a new algorithm for image scaling, and the Flash Player cache for local caching of common platform components to reduce <span class="caps">SWF </span>sizes and app loading times</li>
<p></p>
<li>Support for full-screen mode for Linux</li>
<p></p>
<li><span class="caps">MSAA</span> Accessibility support for the plugin</li>
<p></p>
<li>Mac OS X Leopard support</li>
<p></p>
<li>And <a title="bug fixes" href="http://www.kaourantin.net/2007/12/adobe-flash-player-9-update-3-released.html">bug fixes</a></li>
</ul>
<p>You can download the <a title="Flash Player Datasheet" href="http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/pdfs/Datasheet_Flash_Player_9_ue.pdf">Flash Player Datasheet</a> (PDF) from Adobe. Visit and Download the new <a title="Flash Player" href="http://www.adobe.com/go/flashplayer/">Flash Player</a>.<br />
<a title="Comment on Flash Player update" href="http://www.brajeshwar.com/2007/adobe-delivers-flash-player-9-with-h264-video-support/"><br />
Comments</a></p>
<p>Tag: </p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41546/0/cc?z=1"><img width="336" height="55" border="0" alt="" src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41546/0/vc?z=1&amp;dim=41553" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/adobe-announces-flash-player-9-update-2007-12/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Confusing New YouTube Player</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/the-confusing-new-youtube-player-2007-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/the-confusing-new-youtube-player-2007-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philipp Lenssen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=41860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If the user interface ain&#8217;t broken, don&#8217;t fix it... but fixing, Google did, and recently released a new YouTube player that is breaking some of the &#8220;learned&#8221; interface. Below you can see an example of a new style YouTube player:</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the user interface ain&rsquo;t broken, don&rsquo;t fix it&#8230; but fixing, Google did, and recently released a new YouTube player that is breaking some of the &ldquo;learned&rdquo; interface. Below you can see an example of a new style YouTube player:</p>
<p><span id="more-41860"></span></p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://blogoscoped.com/files/confusing-youtube-player-1.png" /></p>
<p>Usually, the red indicated the buffer status. A typical use case is that you hit play, then hit pause, and then let the player finish buffering in one browser window or tab while you continue reading in another window. In other words, you&rsquo;re waiting for the red line to reach the right end, so that you can then watch the whole video fluently in one go.</p>
<p>Only that with the new YouTube player design, the red line will never reach the right end. Google&rsquo;s/ YouTube&rsquo;s not-so-brilliant decision: red now indicates <em>the current position</em> in the video. Which is redundant, as that is already indicated by the little gray bevel circle, but OK. The <em>buffer status</em> on the other hand is now indicated by a darker gray color &ndash; as opposed to the lighter gray color of unbuffered parts. Check below:</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://blogoscoped.com/files/confusing-youtube-player-2.png" /></p>
<p>Unless you watch the player the whole time (or spend extra time <em>thinking</em> about the interface &ndash; which already indicates bad usability), you will find it hard to even differentiate between the two gray tones. In above use case &ndash; hitting pause, to then switch to another window &ndash; the buffering indicator has thus been practically lost for casual purposes.</p>
<p>In the forum, David Hetfield agreed saying &ldquo;I&rsquo;ve been waiting for hours for a video to load, but then i realised it has already been loaded.. It&rsquo;s really annoying!&rdquo;</p>
<hr />
<p>On another note, have you tried telling someone to check out a specific part in the video? The YouTube player only indicates remaining time. &ldquo;Check out minute minus 3.22&rdquo; is not very intuitive, though. But wait, you can click on the time indicator to change it from negative to positive display. Is that easy to discover though &ndash; again, assuming you don&rsquo;t spend a lot of time exploring the YouTube player (which is only one of many web video players, each with their own interfaces)?</p>
<p><a title="Comment on new YouTube player" href="http://blogoscoped.com/forum/114837.html">Comments</a></p>
<p>Tag: </p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41546/0/cc?z=1"><img width="336" height="55" border="0" src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41546/0/vc?z=1&amp;dim=41553" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/the-confusing-new-youtube-player-2007-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kmart To Only Offer HD DVD Player</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/kmart-to-only-offer-hd-dvd-player-2007-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/kmart-to-only-offer-hd-dvd-player-2007-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sachoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD-DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=41620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Toshiba says that discount retailer Kmart will only sell Toshiba HD DVD players and will not offer Blu-ray players.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toshiba says that discount retailer Kmart will only sell Toshiba HD DVD players and will not offer Blu-ray players.</p>
<p><span id="more-41620"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/sm_body/hddvdplayer_1102.jpg" align="right" alt="Toshiba HD DVD Player" title="Toshiba HD DVD Player" /></p>
<p><a title="HD DVD" href="http://www.toshiba.com/tai/">Toshiba</a> spokeswoman Jody Sally said that Kmart has decided to carry HD DVD instead of Blu-ray because of its lower price according to Home Media Magazine. The Toshiba HD DVD player sells for $299 but is available for $198 at a number of retailers including Wal-Mart and Circuit City.</p>
<p><a title="Kmart HD DVD" href="http://www.kmart.com/shc/s/home_10151_10104">Kmart</a> will continue to sell the Playstation 3, which has a Blu-ray player inside, but its marketing will be concentrated on HD DVD. The least expensive Blu-ray player retails for $499 and Sony says it will launch a $399 Playstation 3 next month.</p>
<p>Craig Kornblau, president of Universal Studios Home Entertainment, which supports HD DVD said the $200 price will help to reach a mass audience. Sally agreed that the lower price would help sales.</p>
<p>&quot;There was no official move on our MSRP, but I&#8217;m happy to see the strong sales momentum on our players,&quot; Sally said. &quot;We experienced a great lift in player sales when Transformers (Paramount) was released, and the strong momentum continues.&quot;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</p>
<p><center><br />
<a href="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41548/0/cc?z=1"><img src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/41548/0/vc?z=1&#038;dim=41555" width="336" height="55" border="0"></a><br />
</center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/kmart-to-only-offer-hd-dvd-player-2007-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Portable Media Player Owners Want</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/what-portable-media-player-owners-want-2007-09</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/what-portable-media-player-owners-want-2007-09#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sachoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=40626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When portable media player owners choose which videos to buy they want compelling video content that will look good on their small screens, according to Parks Associates, &#34;Portable Multimedia Players: Analysis and Forecasts&#34; report.</p>
<br /><a href="http://aj.600z.com/aj/136480/0/cc?z=1"><img src="http://aj.600z.com/aj/136480/0/vc?z=1&dim=105992&kw=&click=" width="615" height="80" border="0"></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When portable media player owners choose which videos to buy they want compelling video content that will look good on their small screens, according to Parks Associates, &quot;Portable Multimedia Players: Analysis and Forecasts&quot; report.</p>
<p><span id="more-40626"></span><br />
<table width="400" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img width="400" height="200" border="0" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/article_pics/PortableMediaPlayer.jpg" title=" What Portable Media Player Owners Want" alt=" What Portable Media Player Owners Want" class="irImage" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="right" style="padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 45px; padding-right: 45px;" class="caption">What Portable Media Player Owners Want</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" style="padding-bottom: 0px;" class="caption"><img width="334" height="21" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/webpronews/salon/complete.gif" alt="" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Forty-four percent of portable media player owners said appealing video content and optimized video viewing were their main motivations to watch more videos on the portable platform, while 33 percent are motivated by the cost of content, 19 percent by personalization and connectivity features, and 16 percent by ease of use.</p>
<p>&quot;The PMP market has not reached one tenth of its potential yet, and this data explains why,&quot; commented Harry Wang, Senior <a href="http://www.parksassociates.com/" title="PMP">Analyst</a> and author of the report.</p>
<p>&quot;None of the PMP vendors have a perfect score on these five mega factors, although Apple clearly leads the pack in fulfilling the high-ranking needs of the PMP early adopters.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;If they act quickly enough, Apple&#8217;s competitors can take advantage of this rare showing of vulnerability in an otherwise a seamless execution of the iPod+<a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/" title="Apple">iTunes</a> model,&quot; Wang said.</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/what-portable-media-player-owners-want-2007-09/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube Ads (The Aftermath)</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/youtube-ads-the-aftermath-2007-08</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/youtube-ads-the-aftermath-2007-08#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Weinberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embedded]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VideoEgg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=40050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="storycontent">YouTube finally unveiled the first real version of its a platform last week, and we&#8217;re still processing the results. Some stories:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="storycontent">YouTube finally unveiled the first real version of its a platform last week, and we&rsquo;re still processing the results. Some stories:</p>
<p>Everyone&rsquo;s claiming they invented YouTube&rsquo;s ad style, the overlay ad.  <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/22/videoegg-and-lots-of-others-call-bs-on-youtube/">VideoEgg ran a banner</a> on their site, saying, &ldquo;We invented the video overlay ad about a year ago&rdquo;.  Of course, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/23/ok-ok-all-of-you-even-youtube-invented-video-overlay-ads-first/">YouTube invented the embedded Flash player</a> VideoEgg puts its videos inside of, Brightcove has been doing it for two years, and everybody takes good ideas from everybody else. After all, if it&rsquo;s sucha good idea, why wouldn&rsquo;t everybody use it?</p>
<p>Mary Meeker at Morgan Stanley got herself in <a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/youtube/mary-meeker-makes-a-math-mistake-292735.php">an embarrassing situation</a>, as she tried to predict YouTube&rsquo;s future revenue growth and misunderstood the meaning of CPM. By mistaking CPM as &ldquo;cost per impression&rdquo; instead of &ldquo;cost per thousand&rdquo;, <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/mary-meekers-yo.html">she overstated her analysis</a> by a factor of a thousand, predicting $4.8 billion in revenue for YouTube next year (which, if it happens, I&rsquo;d eat my hat).</p>
<p>Of course, since the new estimates were a mere $4.5 million, and analysts don&rsquo;t make their money with tiny numbers, Mary tweaked the estimates so that even though they dropped a factor of a thousand, they were more optimistic than before in terms of percentages. <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/08/mary-meeker-bac.html">As Henry Blodget explains</a>, that&rsquo;s called &ldquo;backing into the numbers&rdquo;, making them fit your expectations, and it&rsquo;s why I don&rsquo;t like analysts.</p>
<p>Anyone can predict anything based on making up numbers. Sure, you can do a lot of math to calculate what your guesses mean in the long term, but if you are still guessing, you aren&rsquo;t bringing anything of value to the table. Unless analysts hold themselves to a higher level of proof than this, they should just sit back down and stop wasting our time.</p>
<p>A significantly large bunch of stupid YouTubers <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9032319">completely misunderstood the new system</a>, proving once again the immaturity of the YouTube community, and their complete inabillity to RTFA. These users started threatening to boycott or just plain leave YouTube if Google started putting ads on their videos. Problem is, Google is only putting ads on videos it has a partnership with, and the complaining idiots are (a) too stupid to understand that and (b) too unimportant to have been offered partnerships.</p>
<p>If you really hate the ads, <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2007/08/23/youtube-adds-overlay-ads-tubestop-stops-them/">TubeStop supposedly never shows the ads</a>, and it has the added bonus of turning off auto-play on YouTube videos.  Vunderbar.</p>
</div>
<div class="storycontent"><a title="Comment on YouTube ads" href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/archives/2007/08/27/youtube-ads-the-aftermath/#comments">Comments</a></div>
<p>Tag: </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/youtube-ads-the-aftermath-2007-08/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MLB Brightens Microsoft Silverlight Player</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/mlb-brightens-microsoft-silverlight-player-2007-08</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/mlb-brightens-microsoft-silverlight-player-2007-08#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=39639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft's new Silverlight browser plug-in media player has a prime spot on the websites of Major League Baseball.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft&#8217;s new Silverlight browser plug-in media player has a prime spot on the websites of Major League Baseball.<br />
<span id="more-39639"></span><br />
Sites like the New York Yankees and for MLB itself prompt visitors to grab a copy of <a href=http://www.microsoft.com/silverlight/why-compelling.aspx>Silverlight</a>, which is Microsoft&#8217;s answer to competitive cross-platform media players like Adobe&#8217;s Flash.</p>
<p>
Once in place, visitors can view video highlights like Barry Bonds&#8217; 756th home run from MLB&#8217;s &#8216;<a href=http://mlb.mlb.com/media/video.jsp?video=200708052132229>Silverlight</a>-powered page. Microsoft said its Silverlight plug-in will work on Windows XP, Vista, and Server 2003 when running IE7.</p>
<p>
Older stuff like IE6, or Firefox 1.5 or 2, on Windows 2000 hasn&#8217;t received support yet. </p>
<p>
Microsoft&#8217;s Silverlight plug-in works on Windows or Mac, though Linux isn&#8217;t supported as an operating system. Like Adobe, Microsoft sees a future where much of the business of content distribution will go to the company that can give the best assurances about protecting copyrighted material.</p>
<p>
A product called Silverlight Streaming should emerge as an option from Microsoft for those content owners. Microsoft <a href=http://www.microsoft.com/silverlight/faq.aspx>described</a> it as an optional paid turnkey offering for supporting DRM-encoded video.</p>
<p>
<small></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/mlb-brightens-microsoft-silverlight-player-2007-08/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Receives NPR Podcast Player</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-receives-npr-podcast-player-2007-08</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-receives-npr-podcast-player-2007-08#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Caverly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=39584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I like listening to music, but when local stations can&#8217;t keep me interested, I turn to National Public Radio.&#160; Facebook users will now have the same option, as the NPR Podcast Player has made its way onto the social networking site.<br />
<br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like listening to music, but when local stations can&rsquo;t keep me interested, I turn to National Public Radio.&nbsp; Facebook users will now have the same option, as the NPR Podcast Player has made its way onto the social networking site.</p>
<p><span id="more-39584"></span> Any thanks should go, in part, to SplashCast &#8211; it&rsquo;s this company&rsquo;s technology that made the move possible.&nbsp; &ldquo;Facebook users can add the application to their profiles (via the URL http://npr.org/facebook ) to automatically receive new NPR Podcasts episodes to listen to and to share this great content with their friends,&rdquo; wrote Marshall Kirkpatrick on the <a title="&quot;NPR Podcast Player Launches in Facebook, powered by SplashCast&quot;" href="http://splashcastmedia.com/npr-podcast-player-launches-in-facebook-powered-by-splashcast">corporate blog</a>.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, it wouldn&rsquo;t be accurate to think of NPR as some stodgy member of &ldquo;old media&rdquo; &#8211; a press release rightly describes the organization as &ldquo;a leader in digital media, incorporating new technology to offer a wide-ranging slate of its news, information, talk, entertainment, music and arts content on all platforms.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Now, as for that content &#8211; I&rsquo;m most excited about the availability of &ldquo;<a href="http://www.cartalk.com/" title="Car Talk Home Page">Car Talk</a>.&rdquo;&nbsp; But &ldquo;Fresh Air,&rdquo; &ldquo;Wait Wait&#8230; Don&rsquo;t Tell Me!,&rdquo; and &ldquo;Story of the Day&rdquo; are also presented as options.</p>
<p>Hat tip to Mashable&rsquo;s <a title="&quot;NPR Latest to Add Branded Splashcast Player as Facebook Apps&quot;" href="http://mashable.com/2007/08/06/npr-splashcast-facebook/">Kristen Nicole</a>, who wrote, &ldquo;Splashcast&rsquo;s customized Facebook application option will be appealing to many in the media industry . . .&rdquo;</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-receives-npr-podcast-player-2007-08/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube Undoes Part Of New Player</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/youtube-undoes-part-of-new-player-2007-06</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/youtube-undoes-part-of-new-player-2007-06#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Weinberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=38440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="storycontent"><a href="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2007-06-08-n64.html" title="YouTube has undone one of the new features in its new embeddable playe">YouTube has undone</a> one of the new features in its new embeddable player, getting rid of the thumbnail bar that would appear every time you ran your mouse over the video. The thumbnails now only appear after a clip has finished, or if you click the Menu button.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="storycontent"><a href="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2007-06-08-n64.html" title="YouTube has undone one of the new features in its new embeddable playe">YouTube has undone</a> one of the new features in its new embeddable player, getting rid of the thumbnail bar that would appear every time you ran your mouse over the video. The thumbnails now only appear after a clip has finished, or if you click the Menu button. This is a very good move, because the thumbnails would appear every time you sneezed, and would appear at the beginning of the video no matter what (very distracting, and at exactly the time you&rsquo;d be least interested in them).</p>
<p>YouTube responded to user criticism, rolling back that feature within a day of the new interface, showing they are listening and care if people really hate a new feature. It was kind of annoying, and I&rsquo;m glad to see it work this way. I still don&rsquo;t like the way the thumbnails rip off Apple&rsquo;s dock feature, and in a way that makes it kind of hard to browse (too sensitive), but they seem committed to improving it, so I wouldn&rsquo;t be too worried.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/?p=601">Garrett at ZDNet says he thinks</a> Google might introduce sponsored videos into the related videos section, giving them a new revenue source for YouTube. Not a bad idea. </p>
<p><a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/archives/2007/06/13/youtube-rolls-back-part-of-new-player/#comments" title="Comment on YouTube">Comments</a></p>
</div>
<p>Tag: </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/youtube-undoes-part-of-new-player-2007-06/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remember Real Player? It&#8217;s Back</title>
		<link>http://www.webpronews.com/remember-real-player-its-back-2007-05</link>
		<comments>http://www.webpronews.com/remember-real-player-its-back-2007-05#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WebProNews Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpronews.com/?p=38103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The addition of the Real Player to the Google Pack of software made a lot of tech insiders chuckle, as Real was considered more of a nuisance.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The addition of the Real Player to the Google Pack of software made a lot of tech insiders chuckle, as Real was considered more of a nuisance.<br />
<span id="more-38103"></span><br />
Surprises come from all directions, but it&#8217;s safe to say that no one expected <a href=http://www.real.com>Real</a> to make any impact beyond selling their cool domain name to the highest bidder at some future time. </p>
<p>
&#8220;The new RealPlayer will give you the power to download Internet video instantly,&#8221; reads their website today. <a hrefe=http://www.beet.tv/2007/05/news_break_rips.html>Beet.TV</a> and lots of others caught the announcement at the D Conference in California: </p>
<blockquote><p><i>The new RealPlayer makes it easy for consumers to watch videos whenever and wherever they want, burn them to DVD and CD, and share video links with friends. Most major formats are supported, including Real, Windows Media, Flash, and Quicktime.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>If a video does not have DRM, Real Player will be able to download it. Most Flash videos, like those found on YouTube and many other sharing sites, have little to no DRM, Beet.TV said.</p>
<p>
NewTeeVee writer <a href=http://newteevee.com/2007/05/31/real-makes-its-video-move-downloads/>Liz Gannes</a> invited her readers to move quickly and snag some pre-release Real accounts ahead of the mid-June formal debut. She made a prediction that likely echoed through the techie audience at D and elsewhere: &#8220;Get it fast </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webpronews.com/remember-real-player-its-back-2007-05/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
